vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of 科慕 (CC) and 亨斯迈 (HUN), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
亨斯迈 is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.0× 科慕). 科慕 runs the higher net margin — -3.5% vs -7.1%, a 3.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, 科慕 posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.1% vs -6.7%). 科慕 produced more free cash flow last quarter ($92.0M vs $19.0M). Over the past eight quarters, 科慕's revenue compounded faster (-1.2% CAGR vs -4.0%).
科慕公司是一家美国化工企业，2015年7月从杜邦分拆成立，总部位于美国特拉华州威尔明顿。公司主营产品包括具备不粘特性的知名品牌特氟龙（聚四氟乙烯PTFE）、二氧化钛以及制冷剂气体，在特种化工领域拥有深厚的技术积累。
亨斯迈公司是总部位于美国得克萨斯州伍德兰兹的全球化化工巨头，面向消费端与工业客户生产、销售各类化工产品，主营聚氨酯、高性能材料及胶粘剂，客户覆盖宝马、通用电气、雪佛龙、宝洁、联合利华等知名品牌。目前公司在全球25个国家设有60余处生产、研发及运营基地，员工约7000人。
CC vs HUN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $-47.0M | $-96.0M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | 12.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -4.4% |
| Net Margin | -3.5% | -7.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.1% | -6.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -261.5% | 31.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | $-0.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | $-96.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.0M | $-25.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-380.0M | $-158.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.0M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | $-141.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.0M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $22.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.0M | $-37.0M |
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | 12.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.9% | 13.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.4% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | -4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | -2.6% |
| Q4 25 | -3.5% | -7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.5% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | -0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | -2.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.32 | $-0.56 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.53 | $-0.92 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.82 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.36 | $-0.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $670.0M | $429.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.1B | $2.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $250.0M | $2.8B |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | $7.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 16.40× | 0.73× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $670.0M | $429.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.0M | $468.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.0M | $399.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.0M | $334.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.0M | $340.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.0M | $330.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $604.0M | $335.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $746.0M | $552.0M |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0B | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $250.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.0M | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.0M | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $643.0M | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $714.0M | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $753.0M | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.0B | $7.6B |
| Q4 25 | 16.40× | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.96× | 0.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.99× | 0.72× | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.18× | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.11× | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.20× | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.53× | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.27× | 0.65× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $137.0M | $76.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.0M | $19.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.9% | 1.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 3.4% | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $51.0M | $116.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $137.0M | $76.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0M | $196.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.0M | $91.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.0M | $-74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.0M | $153.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.0M | $129.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-620.0M | $46.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-290.0M | $-65.0M |
| Q4 25 | $92.0M | $19.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.0M | $153.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | $54.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-196.0M | $-110.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $102.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | $88.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-693.0M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-392.0M | $-107.0M |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.3% | -7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.6% | -0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.8% | -7.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.33× | 2.09× | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.37× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CC
| Titanium Technologies | $563.0M | 42% |
| Thermal And Specialized Solutions | $443.0M | 33% |
| Advanced Performance Materials | $312.0M | 23% |
| Other Non-Reportable Segment | $12.0M | 1% |
HUN
| Diversified | $897.0M | 66% |
| Specialty | $231.0M | 17% |
| Performance Products | $113.0M | 8% |
| Advanced Materials | $61.0M | 5% |
| Related Party Customers | $19.0M | 1% |
| Other | $12.0M | 1% |
