vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CROWN HOLDINGS, INC. (CCK) and PILGRIMS PRIDE CORP (PPC), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PILGRIMS PRIDE CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.5B vs $3.1B, roughly 1.4× CROWN HOLDINGS, INC.). CROWN HOLDINGS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 4.8% vs 1.9%, a 2.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CROWN HOLDINGS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.7% vs 3.3%). CROWN HOLDINGS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($255.0M vs $10.0M). Over the past eight quarters, CROWN HOLDINGS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (6.0% CAGR vs 1.8%).
Danish Crown is an internationally oriented Danish food company with butchery operations, processing and sales of primarily pork and beef. Through a number of subsidiaries, the group is widely represented within the food industry with various food products. The CEO is Niels Duedahl and the headquarters are located in Randers.
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation is an American, multi-national food company, currently one of the largest chicken producers in the United States and Puerto Rico and the second-largest chicken producer in Mexico. It exited bankruptcy in December 2009 and relocated its U.S. headquarters to Greeley, Colorado, in 2011. It is majority-owned by JBS S.A. Pilgrim's Pride purchased Gold'n Plump for $350 million in late November 2016.
CCK vs PPC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.1B | $4.5B |
| Net Profit | $150.0M | $88.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 9.5% |
| Operating Margin | 12.0% | 4.5% |
| Net Margin | 4.8% | 1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.7% | 3.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -58.1% | -62.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.32 | $0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $4.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $4.4B |
| Q4 25 | $150.0M | $88.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $214.0M | $342.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $181.0M | $355.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $193.0M | $296.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $358.0M | $235.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-175.0M | $349.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $174.0M | $326.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $67.0M | $174.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.8% |
| Q4 25 | 12.0% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.4% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.6% | 9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.8% | 5.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.7% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.7% | 6.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.3% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.7% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.4% | 4.0% |
| Q4 25 | $1.32 | $0.37 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.85 | $1.44 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.56 | $1.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.65 | $1.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.01 | $1.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.47 | $1.47 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.45 | $1.37 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.56 | $0.73 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $764.0M | $640.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.9B | $3.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.0B | $3.7B |
| Total Assets | $14.3B | $10.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.96× | 0.84× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $764.0M | $640.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $612.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $936.0M | $849.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $779.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $918.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $870.8M |
| Q4 25 | $5.9B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.4B | $3.3B |
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | $3.5B |
| Q4 25 | $14.3B | $10.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.6B | $10.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.5B | $10.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.8B | $11.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.8B | $10.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1B | $10.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9B | $10.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.7B | $9.8B |
| Q4 25 | 1.96× | 0.84× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.07× | 0.87× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.18× | 0.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.31× | 1.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.23× | 0.76× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.93× | 0.76× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.92× | 0.85× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.98× | 0.96× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $487.0M | $291.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $255.0M | $10.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.2% | 0.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 7.4% | 6.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 3.25× | 3.31× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.1B | $653.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $487.0M | $291.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $580.0M | $458.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $449.0M | $495.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | $126.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $295.0M | $349.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $554.0M | $651.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $445.0M | $718.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-102.0M | $271.0M |
| Q4 25 | $255.0M | $10.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $488.0M | $275.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $393.0M | $339.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-19.0M | $28.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $146.0M | $176.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $478.0M | $565.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $361.0M | $617.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-196.0M | $171.9M |
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.9% | 13.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.0% | 3.9% |
| Q4 25 | 7.4% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.25× | 3.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.71× | 1.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.48× | 1.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.07× | 0.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.82× | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.56× | 2.20× | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.52× | 1.55× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CCK
| Transferred Over Time | $1.8B | 57% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.3B | 43% |
PPC
| Retail | $1.5B | 33% |
| Europe Reportable Segment | $1.4B | 31% |
| Food Service | $889.2M | 20% |
| Prepared Product | $332.8M | 7% |
| Product Export | $122.7M | 3% |
| Other Sales Channel | $96.0M | 2% |
| Other Product And Service | $79.7M | 2% |
| Related Party | $21.7M | 0% |
| Seara Meats B.V. | $18.9M | 0% |
| Penasul UKLTD | $10.3M | 0% |
| JBSUSA Food Company | $5.4M | 0% |
