vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (CCO) and 天空广播 (SKYQ), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
天空广播 runs the higher net margin — 1.7% vs 324.3%, a 322.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($30.3M vs $1.1M).
Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc.是一家专注于户外广告业务的跨国企业，总部位于美国得克萨斯州圣安东尼奥，在全球多个市场布局户外广告媒体网络，为各类品牌客户提供场景化的户外广告传播服务。
Sky（Sky UK Limited）是英国知名广播与电信企业，面向英国境内个人及企业，提供电视、宽带互联网、固话及移动通信服务。该公司现为Sky集团旗下子公司，总部设在伊斯灵沃思的Sky演播中心。
CCO vs SKYQ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $461.5M | $-883.4K |
| Net Profit | $8.0M | $-2.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 136.4% |
| Operating Margin | 23.3% | 259.4% |
| Net Margin | 1.7% | 324.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.2% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 144.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.01 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $461.5M | $-883.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $405.6M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $402.8M | $-318.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.2M | $-901.6K | ||
| Q4 24 | $426.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $375.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $376.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $326.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.0M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-60.1M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.5M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.5M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-39.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-89.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 136.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 259.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.9% | 241.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.2% | 546.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | 295.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.7% | 324.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.8% | 357.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 693.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.7% | 369.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -27.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.19 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $190.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-3.4B | $3.2M |
| Total Assets | $3.8B | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $190.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $138.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $395.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $201.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $189.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $193.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | $-3.4B | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.5B | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4B | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.4B | $9.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $20.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $24.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $56.3M | $1.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $30.3M | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.6% | -128.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 5.6% | -4.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 7.04× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $32.0M | $-3.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $56.3M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.2M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.6M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-34.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $30.3M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.4M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-29.2M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.6M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-27.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-61.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | -128.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | 123.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.2% | 390.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.2% | 221.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -18.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | -4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | -4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | -3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.32× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
