vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cerence Inc. (CRNC) and FingerMotion, Inc. (FNGR), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cerence Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($115.1M vs $5.8M, roughly 19.9× FingerMotion, Inc.). Cerence Inc. runs the higher net margin — -4.6% vs -28.8%, a 24.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cerence Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (126.1% vs -32.1%). Cerence Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($35.6M vs $-566.7K). Over the past eight quarters, Cerence Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (30.3% CAGR vs -15.9%).
Cerence Inc. is an American multinational software company that develops artificial intelligence (AI) assistant technology primarily for automobiles.
Leap Motion, Inc. was an American company, active from 2010 to 2019, that manufactured and marketed a computer hardware sensor device. The device supports hand and finger motions as input, analogous to a mouse, but requires no hand contact or touching. In 2016, the company released new software designed for hand tracking in virtual reality. The company was sold to the British company Ultrahaptics in 2019, which rebranded the two companies under the new name Ultraleap.
CRNC vs FNGR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q3 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $115.1M | $5.8M |
| Net Profit | $-5.2M | $-1.7M |
| Gross Margin | 86.3% | 4.5% |
| Operating Margin | 25.5% | -29.4% |
| Net Margin | -4.6% | -28.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 126.1% | -32.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 78.4% | -0.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | $-0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $115.1M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.6M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.2M | $8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.0M | $10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.9M | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.8M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.5M | $8.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $67.8M | $8.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-5.2M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.4M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.7M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.7M | $-107.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.3M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-20.4M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-313.5M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-278.0M | $-467.6K |
| Q4 25 | 86.3% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 72.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 73.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 77.1% | 13.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 65.0% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 71.5% | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 69.2% | 8.8% |
| Q4 25 | 25.5% | -29.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.9% | -17.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.5% | -23.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.2% | -9.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -33.3% | -18.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -35.1% | -20.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -503.1% | -20.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -389.8% | -5.8% |
| Q4 25 | -4.6% | -28.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -22.0% | -17.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.4% | -23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.8% | -1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -47.7% | -19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -37.3% | -20.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -444.5% | -19.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -409.8% | -5.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.12 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.26 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.46 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.57 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.49 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.50 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.66 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.5M | $24.2K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $171.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $150.4M | $16.4M |
| Total Assets | $602.0M | $60.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.14× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $2.5M | $24.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $221.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5M | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9M | $164.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $810.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4M | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.4M | $1.5M |
| Q4 25 | $171.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $199.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $198.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $257.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $256.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $281.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $280.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $278.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $150.4M | $16.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.7M | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.7M | $16.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $149.3M | $13.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $120.7M | $9.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.1M | $9.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $154.2M | $10.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $463.4M | $11.7M |
| Q4 25 | $602.0M | $60.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $630.6M | $51.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $636.8M | $55.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $665.5M | $48.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $617.5M | $31.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $702.4M | $30.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $674.0M | $26.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $987.1M | $18.4M |
| Q4 25 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.12× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.82× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.60× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $37.9M | $-548.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $35.6M | $-566.7K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 31.0% | -9.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 2.0% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $74.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $37.9M | $-548.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.7M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.3M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.9M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0M | $-374.3K |
| Q4 25 | $35.6M | $-566.7K | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.1M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.9M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-801.0K | $-374.3K |
| Q4 25 | 31.0% | -9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.8% | -14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.5% | -19.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.2% | -4.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CRNC
| License | $87.8M | 76% |
| Connected Services | $14.5M | 13% |
| Professional Services | $12.8M | 11% |
FNGR
Segment breakdown not available.
