vs
Custom Truck One Source, Inc.（CTOS）与STAG Industrial, Inc.（STAG）财务数据对比。点击上方公司名可切换其他公司
Custom Truck One Source, Inc.的季度营收约是STAG Industrial, Inc.的1.9倍（$422.2M vs $224.2M），STAG Industrial, Inc.净利率更高（27.6% vs -4.2%，领先31.8%），STAG Industrial, Inc.同比增速更快（9.1% vs -8.5%），过去两年Custom Truck One Source, Inc.的营收复合增速更高（14.8% vs 8.7%）
Custom Truck One Source是北美领先的专用重型卡车及设备解决方案提供商，业务覆盖定制车辆制造、设备销售与租赁、售后配件供应及维保服务，主要服务基建、公用事业、建筑、能源等核心领域。
Stag Arms是2003年5月成立的枪械制造商，总部位于美国怀俄明州夏延，主打Stag-15系列AR-15步枪，所有枪械及配件均为美国本土生产，最知名的是适配左撇子操作习惯的定制款AR-15步枪。
CTOS vs STAG — 直观对比
营收规模更大
CTOS
是对方的1.9倍
$224.2M
营收增速更快
STAG
高出17.6%
-8.5%
净利率更高
STAG
高出31.8%
-4.2%
两年增速更快
CTOS
近两年复合增速
8.7%
损益表 — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| 指标 | | |
|---|---|---|
| 营收 | $422.2M | $224.2M |
| 净利润 | $-17.8M | $62.0M |
| 毛利率 | 20.3% | — |
| 营业利润率 | 2.9% | — |
| 净利率 | -4.2% | 27.6% |
| 营收同比 | -8.5% | 9.1% |
| 净利润同比 | -333.7% | — |
| 每股收益（稀释后） | $-0.08 | $0.32 |
绿色 = 该指标领先。财年不对齐时期间可能不同
8季度营收与利润趋势
并排季度历史对比，按日历期对齐，财年错位的公司也能正确匹配
营收CTOSSTAG
| Q1 26 | $422.2M | $224.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $387.3M | $220.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $359.9M | $211.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $392.2M | $207.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $307.1M | $205.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $398.3M | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $337.5M | $190.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $320.6M | $189.8M |
净利润CTOSSTAG
| Q1 26 | $-17.8M | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.9M | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.8M | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.4M | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.8M | $91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.6M | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-17.4M | $41.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.5M | $59.8M |
毛利率CTOSSTAG
| Q1 26 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.8% | — |
营业利润率CTOSSTAG
| Q1 26 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | — |
净利率CTOSSTAG
| Q1 26 | -4.2% | 27.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.6% | 23.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.2% | 24.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.8% | 44.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.9% | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.2% | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.6% | 31.5% |
每股收益（稀释后）CTOSSTAG
| Q1 26 | $-0.08 | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.10 | — |
资产负债表与财务实力
最新季度各公司的流动性、杠杆与账面价值一览
| 指标 | | |
|---|---|---|
| 现金及短期投资手头流动性 | $6.3M | $8.9M |
| 总债务越低越好 | $25.9M | — |
| 股东权益账面价值 | $809.1M | $3.6B |
| 总资产 | $3.4B | $7.2B |
| 负债/权益比越低杠杆越低 | 0.03× | — |
8季度趋势，按日历期对齐
现金及短期投资CTOSSTAG
| Q1 26 | $6.3M | $8.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.3M | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.1M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1M | $33.3M |
总债务CTOSSTAG
| Q1 26 | $25.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.8B |
股东权益CTOSSTAG
| Q1 26 | $809.1M | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $809.1M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $784.7M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $790.1M | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $813.4M | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $861.3M | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $837.5M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $856.7M | $3.3B |
总资产CTOSSTAG
| Q1 26 | $3.4B | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $6.4B |
负债/权益比CTOSSTAG
| Q1 26 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.03× | 0.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.10× | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.04× | 0.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.97× | 0.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.77× | 0.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.87× | 0.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.79× | 0.84× |
财务流量对比
营收 → 毛利润 → 营业利润 → 净利润流向图
业务分部营收拆解
CTOS
| Equipment sales | $273.9M | 65% |
| Rental revenue | $116.3M | 28% |
| Parts sales and services | $32.1M | 8% |
STAG
暂无分部数据
