vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of 3D SYSTEMS CORP (DDD) and STRATASYS LTD. (SSYS), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STRATASYS LTD. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($137.0M vs $106.3M, roughly 1.3× 3D SYSTEMS CORP). 3D SYSTEMS CORP runs the higher net margin — -18.4% vs -40.6%, a 22.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, STRATASYS LTD. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.2% vs -4.3%). STRATASYS LTD. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.5M vs $-16.6M). Over the past eight quarters, 3D SYSTEMS CORP's revenue compounded faster (1.6% CAGR vs -7.4%).
3D Systems Corporation is an American company based in Rock Hill, South Carolina, that engineers, manufactures, and sells 3D printers, 3D printing materials, 3D printed parts, and application engineering services. The company creates product concept models, precision and functional prototypes, master patterns for tooling, as well as production parts for direct digital manufacturing. It uses proprietary processes to fabricate physical objects using input from computer-aided design and manufact...
Stratasys, Ltd. is an American-Israeli manufacturer of 3D printers, software, and materials for polymer additive manufacturing as well as 3D-printed parts on-demand. The company is incorporated in Israel. Engineers use Stratasys systems to model complex geometries in a wide range of polymer materials, including: ABS, polyphenylsulfone (PPSF), polycarbonate (PC), polyetherimide and Nylon 12.
DDD vs SSYS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $106.3M | $137.0M |
| Net Profit | $-19.5M | $-55.6M |
| Gross Margin | 30.8% | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | -21.3% | -16.6% |
| Net Margin | -18.4% | -40.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.3% | -2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 41.7% | -109.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $106.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.2M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.8M | $138.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $94.5M | $136.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $111.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $112.9M | $140.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $113.3M | $138.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $102.9M | $144.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-19.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.1M | $-55.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $104.4M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-37.0M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-33.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-178.6M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-27.3M | $-25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-16.0M | $-26.0M |
| Q4 25 | 30.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.1% | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.6% | 44.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.9% | 44.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.6% | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.8% | 44.4% |
| Q4 25 | -21.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.4% | -16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.2% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -38.9% | -9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -160.0% | -18.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -23.3% | -18.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -38.7% | -17.0% |
| Q4 25 | -18.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.8% | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 110.1% | -12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -39.1% | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -158.2% | -19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.1% | -18.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.5% | -18.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.57 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.28 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.26 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.35 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.21 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.12 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $95.6M | $71.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $240.4M | $852.5M |
| Total Assets | $521.7M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $95.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.5M | $71.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.4M | $71.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.0M | $70.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $171.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $190.0M | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $192.7M | $70.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $212.0M | $91.1M |
| Q4 25 | $240.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $221.1M | $852.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $241.2M | $902.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $145.6M | $784.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $176.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $218.0M | $831.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $381.7M | $850.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $408.4M | $866.1M |
| Q4 25 | $521.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $554.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $587.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $583.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $608.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $658.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $821.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $857.2M | $1.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-14.7M | $6.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-16.6M | $2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -15.7% | 1.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 1.8% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-97.8M | $-11.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $-14.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.5M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.8M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.8M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-801.0K | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.8M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-25.5M | $7.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-16.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.8M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.8M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-36.6M | $789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.4M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.7M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-28.7M | $5.0M |
| Q4 25 | -15.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -17.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.4% | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -38.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.9% | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.0% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -27.9% | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.25× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DDD
| Products | $62.6M | 59% |
| Services | $43.7M | 41% |
SSYS
Segment breakdown not available.