vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) and Rafael Holdings, Inc. (RFL), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Leonardo DRS, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $240.0K, roughly 4416.7× Rafael Holdings, Inc.). Leonardo DRS, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 9.6% vs -4090.0%, a 4099.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Rafael Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (87.5% vs 8.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Rafael Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (85.2% CAGR vs 24.1%).
莱昂纳多DRS公司是美国本土国防承包商，前身为DRS技术公司，曾于纽约证券交易所挂牌交易，2008年被莱昂纳多的前身芬梅卡尼卡收购，核心业务为向美国军方提供先进国防技术及配套系统产品。
拉斐尔先进防御系统有限公司是一家以色列国防科技企业，其前身是以色列国防部旗下负责开发武器与军用技术的国家级国防研发实验室，2002年正式改组为有限公司，专注于各类先进国防装备与军事技术的研发生产。
DRS vs RFL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $240.0K |
| Net Profit | $102.0M | $-9.8M |
| Gross Margin | 25.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | -4225.4% |
| Net Margin | 9.6% | -4090.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.1% | 87.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.6% | -9.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.38 | $-0.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $240.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $960.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $829.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $799.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $981.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $812.0M | $165.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $753.0M | $336.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $688.0M | $68.0K |
| Q4 25 | $102.0M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $89.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.0M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.0M | $-32.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.0M | $6.0M |
| Q4 25 | 25.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.4% | 74.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 11.9% | -4225.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.2% | -2330.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.3% | -27726.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.3% | -4622.1% |
| Q4 25 | 9.6% | -4090.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -2707.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | -9628.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.2% | 8892.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.38 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.26 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.34 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.14 | $-1.36 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.11 | $0.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $647.0M | $45.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $321.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $85.2M |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $105.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.12× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $647.0M | $45.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $309.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $278.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $380.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $598.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $198.0M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $149.0M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $160.0M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $321.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $326.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $331.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $335.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $345.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $351.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $356.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $85.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $86.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $104.9M |
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $105.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | $96.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | $101.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8B | $106.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.15× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $425.0M | $-6.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $376.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 35.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 4.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 4.17× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $227.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $425.0M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-138.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $443.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.0M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.0M | $-251.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-265.0M | $-2.5M |
| Q4 25 | $376.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-56.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-170.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $414.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | $-375.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-275.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 35.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -21.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | -111.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -40.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | 36.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.17× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.76× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.89× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.14× | -0.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
