vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (DV) and Phoenix Asia Holdings Ltd (PHOE), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($205.6M vs $3.8M, roughly 54.3× Phoenix Asia Holdings Ltd). Phoenix Asia Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs 16.7%, a 2.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Double Vision is a Malaysian production studio. Established in 1985, it has production hubs in Malaysia and Indonesia. Double Vision produces over 1,400 hours of television programming per year in various languages and genres for the regional market. It also houses international entertainment TV network, Channel [V], in its studios.
Phoenix Television is a majority state-owned television network that operates Mandarin and Cantonese-language channels serving mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau, and other regions with significant Chinese-speaking audiences. It is headquartered in Shenzhen and Hong Kong and is also registered in the Cayman Islands.
DV vs PHOE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $205.6M | $3.8M |
| Net Profit | $29.3M | $631.4K |
| Gross Margin | 82.5% | 28.5% |
| Operating Margin | 18.4% | 19.8% |
| Net Margin | 14.3% | 16.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.9% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 25.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $205.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $188.6M | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $165.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $190.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $169.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $140.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $29.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.2M | $631.4K | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 82.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 82.3% | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 82.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 82.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 83.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 81.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 18.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.2% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.04 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $259.0M | $1.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $7.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $8.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $259.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $200.7M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $334.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $8.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $72.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $62.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 30.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 5.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 2.48× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $172.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $72.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $62.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 30.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.48× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.02× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.66× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.95× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.80× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.44× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DV
| Activation | $116.5M | 57% |
| Measurement | $69.6M | 34% |
| Supply Side | $19.5M | 9% |
PHOE
Segment breakdown not available.
