vs

EPAM Systems(EPAM)与孩之宝(HAS)财务数据对比。点击上方公司名可切换其他公司

孩之宝的季度营收约是EPAM Systems的1.0倍($1.4B vs $1.4B),孩之宝净利率更高(13.9% vs 5.9%,领先8.0%),孩之宝同比增速更快(31.3% vs 7.6%),过去两年孩之宝的营收复合增速更高(38.2% vs 10.5%)

EPAM Systems是总部位于美国宾夕法尼亚州纽敦的企业,核心业务涵盖软件工程服务、数字平台研发、数字产品设计三大板块,同时是MACH联盟的创始成员,在全球数字化服务赛道拥有深厚的技术积累与行业认可度。

孩之宝是1923年12月6日成立的美国跨国玩具制造与娱乐控股企业,总部位于罗德岛州波塔基特。旗下拥有Kenner、米尔顿·布拉德利、派克兄弟、威世智等知名品牌,持有大量热门IP商标权,业务覆盖玩具生产、游戏开发、娱乐内容出品等多个领域。

EPAM vs HAS — 直观对比

营收规模更大
HAS
HAS
是对方的1.0倍
HAS
$1.4B
$1.4B
EPAM
营收增速更快
HAS
HAS
高出23.7%
HAS
31.3%
7.6%
EPAM
净利率更高
HAS
HAS
高出8.0%
HAS
13.9%
5.9%
EPAM
两年增速更快
HAS
HAS
近两年复合增速
HAS
38.2%
10.5%
EPAM

损益表 — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

指标
EPAM
EPAM
HAS
HAS
营收
$1.4B
$1.4B
净利润
$82.5M
$201.6M
毛利率
68.7%
营业利润率
8.3%
20.6%
净利率
5.9%
13.9%
营收同比
7.6%
31.3%
净利润同比
12.3%
687.8%
每股收益(稀释后)
$1.52
$1.46

绿色 = 该指标领先。财年不对齐时期间可能不同

8季度营收与利润趋势

并排季度历史对比,按日历期对齐,财年错位的公司也能正确匹配

营收
EPAM
EPAM
HAS
HAS
Q1 26
$1.4B
Q4 25
$1.4B
$1.4B
Q3 25
$1.4B
$1.4B
Q2 25
$1.4B
$980.8M
Q1 25
$1.3B
$887.1M
Q4 24
$1.2B
$1.1B
Q3 24
$1.2B
$1.3B
Q2 24
$1.1B
$995.3M
净利润
EPAM
EPAM
HAS
HAS
Q1 26
$82.5M
Q4 25
$109.4M
$201.6M
Q3 25
$106.8M
$233.2M
Q2 25
$88.0M
$-855.8M
Q1 25
$73.5M
$98.6M
Q4 24
$103.3M
$-34.3M
Q3 24
$136.3M
$223.2M
Q2 24
$98.6M
$138.5M
毛利率
EPAM
EPAM
HAS
HAS
Q1 26
Q4 25
30.1%
68.7%
Q3 25
29.5%
70.1%
Q2 25
28.8%
77.0%
Q1 25
26.9%
76.9%
Q4 24
30.4%
67.4%
Q3 24
34.6%
70.4%
Q2 24
29.3%
76.1%
营业利润率
EPAM
EPAM
HAS
HAS
Q1 26
8.3%
Q4 25
10.6%
20.6%
Q3 25
10.4%
24.6%
Q2 25
9.3%
-81.4%
Q1 25
7.6%
19.2%
Q4 24
10.9%
5.4%
Q3 24
15.2%
23.6%
Q2 24
10.5%
21.3%
净利率
EPAM
EPAM
HAS
HAS
Q1 26
5.9%
Q4 25
7.8%
13.9%
Q3 25
7.7%
16.8%
Q2 25
6.5%
-87.3%
Q1 25
5.6%
11.1%
Q4 24
8.3%
-3.1%
Q3 24
11.7%
17.4%
Q2 24
8.6%
13.9%
每股收益(稀释后)
EPAM
EPAM
HAS
HAS
Q1 26
$1.52
Q4 25
$1.97
$1.46
Q3 25
$1.91
$1.64
Q2 25
$1.56
$-6.10
Q1 25
$1.28
$0.70
Q4 24
$1.80
$-0.25
Q3 24
$2.37
$1.59
Q2 24
$1.70
$0.99

资产负债表与财务实力

最新季度各公司的流动性、杠杆与账面价值一览

指标
EPAM
EPAM
HAS
HAS
现金及短期投资手头流动性
$1.0B
总债务越低越好
$165.0M
股东权益账面价值
$3.4B
$565.5M
总资产
$4.7B
$5.6B
负债/权益比越低杠杆越低
0.05×

8季度趋势,按日历期对齐

现金及短期投资
EPAM
EPAM
HAS
HAS
Q1 26
$1.0B
Q4 25
$1.3B
Q3 25
$1.2B
Q2 25
$1.0B
Q1 25
$1.2B
Q4 24
$1.3B
Q3 24
$2.1B
Q2 24
$1.8B
总债务
EPAM
EPAM
HAS
HAS
Q1 26
$165.0M
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
股东权益
EPAM
EPAM
HAS
HAS
Q1 26
$3.4B
Q4 25
$3.7B
$565.5M
Q3 25
$3.7B
$433.8M
Q2 25
$3.7B
$269.7M
Q1 25
$3.6B
$1.2B
Q4 24
$3.6B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$3.6B
$1.3B
Q2 24
$3.4B
$1.2B
总资产
EPAM
EPAM
HAS
HAS
Q1 26
$4.7B
Q4 25
$4.9B
$5.6B
Q3 25
$4.8B
$5.5B
Q2 25
$4.7B
$5.2B
Q1 25
$4.7B
$6.0B
Q4 24
$4.8B
$6.3B
Q3 24
$4.5B
$7.2B
Q2 24
$4.2B
$6.9B
负债/权益比
EPAM
EPAM
HAS
HAS
Q1 26
0.05×
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24

现金流与资本效率

扣除再投资后实际产生的现金。现金流比净利润更难造假

指标
EPAM
EPAM
HAS
HAS
经营现金流最新季度
$403.2M
自由现金流经营现金流 - 资本支出
$389.5M
自由现金流率自由现金流/营收
26.9%
资本支出强度资本支出/营收
0.9%
现金转化率经营现金流/净利润
2.00×
过去12个月自由现金流最近4个季度
$829.9M

8季度趋势,按日历期对齐

经营现金流
EPAM
EPAM
HAS
HAS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$282.9M
$403.2M
Q3 25
$294.7M
$280.6M
Q2 25
$53.2M
$71.3M
Q1 25
$24.2M
$138.1M
Q4 24
$130.3M
$259.8M
Q3 24
$242.0M
$222.5M
Q2 24
$57.0M
$187.3M
自由现金流
EPAM
EPAM
HAS
HAS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$268.1M
$389.5M
Q3 25
$286.4M
$260.9M
Q2 25
$43.4M
$55.2M
Q1 25
$14.8M
$124.3M
Q4 24
$114.5M
$200.8M
Q3 24
$237.0M
$174.0M
Q2 24
$52.3M
$135.4M
自由现金流率
EPAM
EPAM
HAS
HAS
Q1 26
Q4 25
19.0%
26.9%
Q3 25
20.5%
18.8%
Q2 25
3.2%
5.6%
Q1 25
1.1%
14.0%
Q4 24
9.2%
18.2%
Q3 24
20.3%
13.6%
Q2 24
4.6%
13.6%
资本支出强度
EPAM
EPAM
HAS
HAS
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.1%
0.9%
Q3 25
0.6%
1.4%
Q2 25
0.7%
1.6%
Q1 25
0.7%
1.6%
Q4 24
1.3%
5.4%
Q3 24
0.4%
3.8%
Q2 24
0.4%
5.2%
现金转化率
EPAM
EPAM
HAS
HAS
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.59×
2.00×
Q3 25
2.76×
1.20×
Q2 25
0.60×
Q1 25
0.33×
1.40×
Q4 24
1.26×
Q3 24
1.77×
1.00×
Q2 24
0.58×
1.35×

财务流量对比

营收 → 毛利润 → 营业利润 → 净利润流向图

业务分部营收拆解

EPAM
EPAM

暂无分部数据

HAS
HAS

Grow Brands$1.1B75%
Optimize Brands$188.7M13%
Digital And Licensing Gaming$135.7M9%
Class Of Principal Product Family Brands$13.1M1%
Filmand TV$2.4M0%

相关对比