vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fifth District Bancorp, Inc. (FDSB) and FNB CORP/PA/ (FNB), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FNB CORP/PA/ is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($366.0M vs $3.4M, roughly 107.1× Fifth District Bancorp, Inc.). FNB CORP/PA/ runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 45.9%, a 30.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fifth District Bancorp, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.9% vs 13.7%). FNB CORP/PA/ produced more free cash flow last quarter ($99.0M vs $-126.0K).
五三银行公司是一家总部位于美国俄亥俄州辛辛那提的银行控股公司，旗下核心机构五三银行在美国12个州共运营1087家分行与2400台ATM，是美国大型银行之一，位列财富世界500强第321位。
FNB集团是总部位于美国宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡的多元化金融服务机构，为旗下最大子公司第一国民银行的控股主体，截至2025年12月31日总资产超500亿美元，业务覆盖匹兹堡、巴尔的摩、克利夫兰、华盛顿特区、北卡罗来纳州多座城市及南卡罗来纳州查尔斯顿等核心都会区。
FDSB vs FNB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.4M | $366.0M |
| Net Profit | $541.0K | $168.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.1% | 45.1% |
| Net Margin | 15.8% | 45.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 19.9% | 13.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 240.3% | 52.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.10 | $0.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | $366.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $359.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | $348.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $323.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $322.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $323.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $316.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $319.0M |
| Q4 25 | $541.0K | $168.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $343.0K | $150.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | $130.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.0K | $117.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $110.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $110.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $123.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $122.0M |
| Q4 25 | 18.1% | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.0% | 52.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 96.4% | 47.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 45.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.9% |
| Q4 25 | 15.8% | 45.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.3% | 41.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 99.3% | 37.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 36.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 34.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 38.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | $0.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.61 | $0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.02 | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $33.9M | $2.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $129.8M | $6.8B |
| Total Assets | $534.4M | $50.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $33.9M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.4M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.7M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.1M | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $129.8M | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.3M | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.9M | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $127.3M | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.0B |
| Q4 25 | $534.4M | $50.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $539.5M | $49.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $539.8M | $49.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $531.1M | $49.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $48.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $48.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $45.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-44.0K | $128.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-126.0K | $99.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.7% | 27.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 2.4% | 7.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | -0.08× | 0.76× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $942.0K | $376.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $-44.0K | $128.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $117.0K | $167.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $430.0K | $123.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $823.0K | $64.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $326.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-14.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $85.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $245.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-126.0K | $99.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.0K | $149.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $249.0K | $85.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $765.0K | $43.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $278.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-46.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $55.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $216.0M |
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | 27.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 41.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 24.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.0% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 86.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -14.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 67.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.7% | 10.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.1% |
| Q4 25 | -0.08× | 0.76× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.34× | 1.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.14× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.55× | 0.55× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
