vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FULLER H B CO (FUL) and 亨斯迈 (HUN), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
亨斯迈 is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $892.0M, roughly 1.5× FULLER H B CO). FULLER H B CO runs the higher net margin — 7.5% vs -7.1%, a 14.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FULLER H B CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.8% vs -6.7%). FULLER H B CO produced more free cash flow last quarter ($68.9M vs $19.0M). Over the past eight quarters, FULLER H B CO's revenue compounded faster (5.0% CAGR vs -4.0%).
H.B.富勒公司是总部位于美国明尼苏达州圣保罗的跨国粘合剂制造企业，全球第四大粘合剂及密封剂生产商。公司拥有超过20000种产品，广泛应用于建筑、工程、电子、卫生用品、食品包装等领域，在26个国家设有81座生产基地，2024年员工规模约7500人。
亨斯迈公司是总部位于美国得克萨斯州伍德兰兹的全球化化工巨头，面向消费端与工业客户生产、销售各类化工产品，主营聚氨酯、高性能材料及胶粘剂，客户覆盖宝马、通用电气、雪佛龙、宝洁、联合利华等知名品牌。目前公司在全球25个国家设有60余处生产、研发及运营基地，员工约7000人。
FUL vs HUN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $892.0M | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $67.2M | $-96.0M |
| Gross Margin | 32.0% | 12.1% |
| Operating Margin | 12.3% | -4.4% |
| Net Margin | 7.5% | -7.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.8% | -6.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.3% | 31.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.22 | $-0.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $892.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $898.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $917.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $810.4M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $-96.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.2M | $-25.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.8M | $-158.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-141.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.4M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $22.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.0M | $-37.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.0% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.9% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.0% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.5% | 13.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.1% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.3% | -2.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.7% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.8% | -2.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.56 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.22 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.76 | $-0.92 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.82 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.98 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.55 | $-0.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $122.5M | $429.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.0B | $2.8B |
| Total Assets | $5.2B | $7.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.73× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $429.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.5M | $468.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.8M | $399.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $334.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $340.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $131.4M | $330.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $335.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $165.2M | $552.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.7B | $7.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.65× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $99.0M | $76.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $68.9M | $19.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.7% | 1.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 3.4% | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 1.47× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $116.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $76.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | $196.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $91.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $153.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $169.4M | $129.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $46.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.4M | $-65.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $19.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.9M | $153.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $54.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-110.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $102.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $99.9M | $88.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.1M | $-107.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.9% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | -7.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.6% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.09× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.53× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FUL
| Hygiene Health And Consumable Adhesives | $386.1M | 43% |
| Engineering Adhesives | $272.3M | 31% |
| Building Adhesives Solutions | $233.7M | 26% |
HUN
| Diversified | $897.0M | 66% |
| Specialty | $231.0M | 17% |
| Performance Products | $113.0M | 8% |
| Advanced Materials | $61.0M | 5% |
| Related Party Customers | $19.0M | 1% |
| Other | $12.0M | 1% |
