vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INTELLIGENT BIO SOLUTIONS INC. (INBS) and Knightscope, Inc. (KSCP), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Knightscope, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5M vs $896.8K, roughly 2.8× INTELLIGENT BIO SOLUTIONS INC.). INTELLIGENT BIO SOLUTIONS INC. runs the higher net margin — -298.6% vs -435.4%, a 136.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INTELLIGENT BIO SOLUTIONS INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (47.6% vs -9.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Knightscope, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (6.1% CAGR vs 4.3%).
The Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems (IRIS) is part of the ETH Zurich, Switzerland. It replaced the existing Institute of Robotics, of the ETH Zurich in October 2002, when Prof. Bradley J. Nelson moved from the University of Minnesota, United States, to ETH Zurich, and succeeded the Prof. Dr. Gerhard Schweitzer.
Knightscope, Inc. is an American security camera and robotics company headquartered in Mountain View, California. Knightscope designs, builds and deploys robots called Autonomous Data Robots (ADRs) for use in monitoring people in malls, parking lots, neighborhoods and other public areas. Knightscope robots are fully autonomous using self-driving technology and are designed to alert police and security of incidents through sensors that detect weapons, read license plates and detect other suspi...
INBS vs KSCP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $896.8K | $2.5M |
| Net Profit | $-2.7M | $-11.1M |
| Gross Margin | 51.3% | -63.8% |
| Operating Margin | -293.9% | -444.7% |
| Net Margin | -298.6% | -435.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 47.6% | -9.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -19.0% | -58.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.82 | $-0.84 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $896.8K | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $843.9K | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $728.9K | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $607.5K | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $872.3K | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $727.8K | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $823.8K | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | $-11.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.0M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.1M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $-6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.2M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.7M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.8M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.0M | $-7.6M |
| Q4 25 | 51.3% | -63.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.6% | -50.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.8% | -33.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.8% | -22.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.7% | -42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.8% | -20.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -17.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.7% | -64.1% |
| Q4 25 | -293.9% | -444.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -269.8% | -303.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -367.5% | -228.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -350.3% | -234.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -372.8% | -245.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -312.4% | -305.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -386.3% | -211.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -358.6% | -367.3% |
| Q4 25 | -298.6% | -435.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -268.3% | -304.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -366.2% | -230.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -349.0% | -236.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -370.3% | -247.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -307.9% | -430.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -382.5% | -195.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -361.5% | -336.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.82 | $-0.84 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.35 | $-0.98 | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.10 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.44 | $-1.28 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.96 | $-0.72 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.70 | $-3.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.60 | $-2.68 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.43 | $-3.99 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $740.4K | $20.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.1M | $27.8M |
| Total Assets | $17.7M | $41.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.14× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $740.4K | $20.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7M | $20.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0M | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8M | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | $5.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.4M | $2.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $11.1M | $27.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6M | $26.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0M | $15.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.1M | $18.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3M | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.1M | $-26.6M |
| Q4 25 | $17.7M | $41.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0M | $41.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.2M | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6M | $29.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.7M | $28.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.7M | $24.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.8M | $24.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.0M | $24.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.6M | $-10.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -182.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 7.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $-1.6M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.8M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.8M | $-6.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.3M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.9M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.4M | $-8.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.9M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -182.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -262.4% | -258.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -187.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
