vs
Leidos(LDOS)与晖致(VTRS)财务数据对比。点击上方公司名可切换其他公司
Leidos的季度营收约是晖致的1.1倍($4.2B vs $3.7B),晖致同比增速更快(5.0% vs -3.5%),晖致自由现金流更多($619.3M vs $452.0M),过去两年Leidos的营收复合增速更高(3.1% vs 0.5%)
Leidos Holdings, Inc.是总部位于美国弗吉尼亚州雷斯顿的企业,业务覆盖国防、航空、信息技术、生物医学研究领域,提供科研、工程、系统集成及技术服务。其前身为科学应用国际公司(SAIC),2016年8月与洛克希德·马丁旗下IT业务板块合并,成为国防行业规模最大的IT服务提供商。
晖致是一家总部位于美国宾夕法尼亚州卡农斯堡的全球化医药健康企业,于2020年11月16日由迈兰制药与辉瑞旗下老牌业务部门普强合并组建,业务覆盖全球多个国家和地区,专注为大众提供优质的医药健康产品及服务。
LDOS vs VTRS — 直观对比
营收规模更大
LDOS
是对方的1.1倍
$3.7B
营收增速更快
VTRS
高出8.5%
-3.5%
自由现金流更多
VTRS
多$167.3M
$452.0M
两年增速更快
LDOS
近两年复合增速
0.5%
损益表 — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| 指标 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 营收 | $4.2B | $3.7B |
| 净利润 | $327.0M | — |
| 毛利率 | 17.4% | 31.1% |
| 营业利润率 | 11.3% | -5.2% |
| 净利率 | 7.8% | — |
| 营收同比 | -3.5% | 5.0% |
| 净利润同比 | 15.1% | — |
| 每股收益(稀释后) | $2.54 | $-0.34 |
绿色 = 该指标领先。财年不对齐时期间可能不同
8季度营收与利润趋势
并排季度历史对比,按日历期对齐,财年错位的公司也能正确匹配
营收
LDOS
VTRS
| Q1 26 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3B | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1B | $3.8B |
净利润
LDOS
VTRS
| Q1 26 | $327.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $367.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $391.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $363.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $284.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $364.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $322.0M | — |
毛利率
LDOS
VTRS
| Q1 26 | 17.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.0% | 31.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.0% | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.5% | 37.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.6% | 35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 34.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | 39.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.6% | 38.2% |
营业利润率
LDOS
VTRS
| Q1 26 | 11.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.0% | -5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | -88.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.6% | -6.3% |
净利率
LDOS
VTRS
| Q1 26 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | — |
每股收益(稀释后)
LDOS
VTRS
| Q1 26 | $2.54 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.82 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.01 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.77 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.10 | $-2.55 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.43 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.68 | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.37 | $-0.27 |
资产负债表与财务实力
最新季度各公司的流动性、杠杆与账面价值一览
| 指标 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 现金及短期投资手头流动性 | $1.1B | $1.3B |
| 总债务越低越好 | $4.6B | — |
| 股东权益账面价值 | $4.9B | $14.7B |
| 总资产 | $13.5B | $37.2B |
| 负债/权益比越低杠杆越低 | 0.94× | — |
8季度趋势,按日历期对齐
现金及短期投资
LDOS
VTRS
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $974.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $930.0M | $975.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $842.0M | $566.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $943.0M | $755.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $734.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $823.0M | $917.2M |
总债务
LDOS
VTRS
| Q1 26 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1B | — |
股东权益
LDOS
VTRS
| Q1 26 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $14.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | $15.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.3B | $15.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $15.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $19.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $19.5B |
总资产
LDOS
VTRS
| Q1 26 | $13.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.5B | $37.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.5B | $37.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.2B | $38.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.1B | $38.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $41.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.3B | $44.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.9B | $45.3B |
负债/权益比
LDOS
VTRS
| Q1 26 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.92× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.92× | — |
现金流与资本效率
扣除再投资后实际产生的现金。现金流比净利润更难造假
| 指标 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 经营现金流最新季度 | $495.0M | $815.8M |
| 自由现金流经营现金流 - 资本支出 | $452.0M | $619.3M |
| 自由现金流率自由现金流/营收 | 10.8% | 16.8% |
| 资本支出强度资本支出/营收 | 1.0% | 5.3% |
| 现金转化率经营现金流/净利润 | 1.51× | — |
| 过去12个月自由现金流最近4个季度 | — | $1.9B |
8季度趋势,按日历期对齐
经营现金流
LDOS
VTRS
| Q1 26 | $495.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $815.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $711.0M | $744.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.0M | $219.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $299.0M | $535.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $482.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $656.0M | $826.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $374.0M | $379.1M |
自由现金流
LDOS
VTRS
| Q1 26 | $452.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $619.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $680.0M | $658.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.0M | $166.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $213.0M | $492.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $342.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $633.0M | $749.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $351.0M | $320.3M |
自由现金流率
LDOS
VTRS
| Q1 26 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | 8.5% |
资本支出强度
LDOS
VTRS
| Q1 26 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 1.6% |
现金转化率
LDOS
VTRS
| Q1 26 | 1.51× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.82× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.80× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.16× | — |
财务流量对比
营收 → 毛利润 → 营业利润 → 净利润流向图
业务分部营收拆解
LDOS
| US Do D And US Intelligence Community | $1.4B | 32% |
| Cost Reimbursement And Fixed Price Incentive Fee | $1.0B | 24% |
| Commercial And International Segment | $609.0M | 15% |
| Defense Systems Segment | $546.0M | 13% |
| Other | $358.0M | 9% |
| Time And Materials And Fixed Price Level Of Effort | $295.0M | 7% |
| Commercial And Non US Customers | $38.0M | 1% |
VTRS
| Brands | $1.2B | 32% |
| Generics | $1.1B | 29% |
| Lipitor | $377.3M | 10% |
| Norvasc | $175.2M | 5% |
| Other | $136.6M | 4% |
| Lyrica | $119.8M | 3% |
| Viagra | $104.2M | 3% |
| Creon | $98.9M | 3% |
| Epi Pen Auto Injectors | $79.0M | 2% |
| Yupelri | $70.6M | 2% |
| Effexor | $68.1M | 2% |
| Zoloft | $66.8M | 2% |
| Celebrex | $66.2M | 2% |
| Xalabrands | $42.0M | 1% |
| Dymista | $38.6M | 1% |