vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SailPoint, Inc. (SAIL) and OLYMPIC STEEL INC (ZEUS), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OLYMPIC STEEL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($490.7M vs $281.9M, roughly 1.7× SailPoint, Inc.). OLYMPIC STEEL INC runs the higher net margin — -12.8% vs 0.4%, a 13.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SailPoint, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.7% vs 4.4%). SailPoint, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($52.5M vs $-12.9M). Over the past eight quarters, SailPoint, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (19.2% CAGR vs 0.1%).
Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL) is an Indian public sector steel manufacturing corporation based in New Delhi designated as Maharatna CPSE. It is the largest government-owned steel producer, with an annual production of 18.29 million metric tons. Incorporated on 24 January 1973, SAIL has 51,351 employees and is under the administrative control of the Ministry of Steel.
Olympic Steel, Inc. is a metals service center based in Cleveland, Ohio. The company processes and distributes carbon, coated and stainless flat-rolled sheet, coil and plate steel, aluminium alloy, tin plate, and metal-intensive branded products primarily in the United States. Metals processing and value added services include tempering, stretch leveling, cutting-to-length, slitting, edging, shearing, blanking, burning, forming, shot blasting, laser punching, plate rolling, fabricating, machi...
SAIL vs ZEUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2026 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $281.9M | $490.7M |
| Net Profit | $-36.0M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | 66.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -14.8% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | -12.8% | 0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.7% | 4.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -240.9% | -21.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $281.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $264.4M | $490.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $230.5M | $496.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $240.1M | $492.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $235.3M | $418.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $198.6M | $470.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $526.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $526.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-36.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.6M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-187.3M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-80.1M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-59.4M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-87.1M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.7M |
| Q4 25 | 66.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 62.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -14.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -80.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -33.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | -12.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -81.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -33.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -25.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.02 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.42 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.50 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.67 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.97 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $298.1M | $7.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $0 | $240.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.8B | $579.1M |
| Total Assets | $7.5B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $298.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $271.1M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.1M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $121.3M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.2M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $89.7M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.3M |
| Q4 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | $240.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $233.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $235.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $272.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $197.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $209.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $196.8M |
| Q4 25 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.8B | $579.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.8B | $578.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.6B | $574.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-754.1M | $573.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-701.3M | $570.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $569.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $563.0M |
| Q4 25 | $7.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $53.6M | $-5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $52.5M | $-12.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.6% | -2.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 0.4% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | -2.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $41.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $53.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-96.8M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $49.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $24.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $52.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-99.0M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.4M |
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -43.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.38× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SAIL
| Software As A Service Saa S | $156.0M | 55% |
| Term Subscriptions Services | $65.1M | 23% |
| Maintenance | $38.0M | 13% |
| Other | $15.7M | 6% |
| Other Subscription Services | $7.1M | 3% |
ZEUS
| Carbon Flat Products | $268.2M | 55% |
| Specialty Metals Flat Products | $140.9M | 29% |
| Tubular And Pipe Products | $81.6M | 17% |
