In accordance with NCDOI requirements, adjusted RIF excludes delinquent policies.
In accordance with NCDOI requirements, adjusted RIF excludes delinquent policies.
Incurred losses depend to a significant extent on the following factors: • deterioration of regional or national economic conditions leading to a reduction in borrowers’ income and thus their ability to make mortgage payments; • legislative, regulatory, FHFA or GSE action, or executive orders permitting or mandating forbearance or a moratorium on foreclosures or evictions due to events such as natural disasters or COVID-19; • a drop in housing values that could expose us to greater loss on resale of properties obtained through foreclosure proceedings and an adverse change in the effectiveness of loss mitigation actions that could result in an increase in the frequency of expected claim rates; • a drop in housing values that negatively impacts a borrower’s willingness to continue mortgage payments, potentially leading to higher delinquencies and ultimately claims; • if the foreclosure occurs in a state that imposes judicial process, which generally increases the amount of time it takes for a foreclosure to be completed, which impacts severity of the claim; • the credit characteristics in our in-force portfolio, as loans with higher risk characteristics generally result in more delinquencies and claims; • the size of loans we insure, as loans with relatively higher average loan amounts generally result in higher incurred losses; • the coverage percentage on insured loans, as loans with higher percentages of insurance coverage generally correlate with higher incurred losses; • the level and amount of reinsurance coverage maintained with third parties; and • the distribution of claims over the life of a book.
Incurred losses depend to a significant extent on the following factors: • deterioration of regional or national economic conditions leading to a reduction in borrowers’ income and thus their ability to make mortgage payments; • legislative, regulatory, FHFA or GSE action, or executive orders permitting or mandating forbearance or a moratorium on foreclosures or evictions due to events such as natural disasters or COVID-19; • a drop in housing values that could expose us to greater loss on resale of properties obtained through foreclosure proceedings and an adverse change in the effectiveness of loss mitigation actions that could result in an increase in the frequency of expected claim rates; • a drop in housing values that negatively impacts a borrower’s willingness to continue mortgage payments, potentially leading to higher delinquencies and ultimately claims; • if the foreclosure occurs in a state that imposes judicial process, which generally increases the amount of time it takes for a foreclosure to be completed, which impacts severity of the claim; • the credit characteristics in our in-force portfolio, as loans with higher risk characteristics generally result in more delinquencies and claims; • the size of loans we insure, as loans with relatively higher average loan amounts generally result in higher incurred losses; • the coverage percentage on insured loans, as loans with higher percentages of insurance coverage generally correlate with higher incurred losses; 71 • the level and amount of reinsurance coverage maintained with third parties; and • the distribution of claims over the life of a book.
Significant external influences include changes in home prices, unemployment, government housing policies, state foreclosure timeline, general economic conditions, interest rates, tax policy, credit availability and mortgage products. Small changes in assumptions or small deviations of actual experience from 80 assumptions can have, and in the past have had, material impacts on our reserves, results of operations and financial condition.
Significant external influences include changes in home prices, unemployment, government housing policies, state foreclosure timeline, general economic conditions, interest rates, tax policy, credit availability and mortgage products. Small changes in assumptions or small deviations of actual experience from assumptions can have, and in the past have had, material impacts on our reserves, results of operations and financial condition.
We compete with other private mortgage insurers based on pricing, underwriting guidelines, customer relationships, service levels, policy terms, loss mitigation practices, perceived financial strength (including comparative credit ratings), reputation, strength of management, product features and technology ease-of-use. We also compete with governmental agencies (principally the FHA and the VA) primarily based on price and underwriting guidelines.
We compete with other private mortgage insurers based on pricing, underwriting guidelines, customer relationships, service levels, policy terms, loss mitigation practices, perceived financial strength (including 68 comparative credit ratings), reputation, strength of management, product features and technology ease-of-use. We also compete with governmental agencies (principally the FHA and the VA) primarily based on price and underwriting guidelines.
Cancellations of our insurance policies as a result of prepayments and other reductions of IIF, such as rescissions of coverage and claims paid, generally have a negative effect on premiums earned. 77 Persistency Rate and Business Mix The percentage of our IIF that remains insured after taking into account annualized cancellations for the period presented is defined as our persistency rate.
Cancellations of our insurance policies as a result of prepayments and other reductions of IIF, such as rescissions of coverage and claims paid, generally have a negative effect on premiums earned. Persistency Rate and Business Mix The percentage of our IIF that remains insured after taking into account annualized cancellations for the period presented is defined as our persistency rate.
We believe that the operating cash flows generated by our mortgage insurance subsidiary will provide the funds necessary to satisfy our claim payments, operating expenses and taxes in both the short-term and long-term. However, our subsidiaries are subject to regulatory and other capital restrictions with respect to the payment of dividends.
We believe that the operating cash flows generated by our mortgage insurance subsidiary will provide the funds necessary to satisfy our claim payments, operating expenses and taxes in both the short-term and long-term. However, our 102 subsidiaries are subject to regulatory and other capital restrictions with respect to the payment of dividends.
In the event of a borrower default, our coverage reduces and, in certain instances eliminates, losses to the insured by transferring the covered portion of the economic loss to us. Borrower defaults are first reported to us as new delinquencies when the borrower fails to make two consecutive monthly mortgage payments.
In the event of a borrower default, our coverage reduces and, in certain instances eliminates, losses to the 67 insured by transferring the covered portion of the economic loss to us. Borrower defaults are first reported to us as new delinquencies when the borrower fails to make two consecutive monthly mortgage payments.
Because these assumptions relate to factors that are not known in advance, change over time, are difficult to accurately predict and are inherently uncertain, we cannot determine with precision the ultimate amounts we will pay for actual claims or the timing of those payments.
Because these assumptions relate to factors that are not known in advance, change over time, are difficult to accurately predict and are 72 inherently uncertain, we cannot determine with precision the ultimate amounts we will pay for actual claims or the timing of those payments.
More recently, in response to FTHB 78 demand, there has been modest credit expansion that accommodates LTV over 95% and higher DTI ratios. Even after this expansion, private mortgage insurers and the GSEs have maintained strong credit standards well above historical norms.
More recently, in response to FTHB demand, there has been modest credit expansion that accommodates LTV over 95% and higher DTI ratios. Even after this expansion, private mortgage insurers and the GSEs have maintained strong credit standards well above historical norms.
For 109 purposes of determining EHI’s compliance with the foregoing financial covenants, the consolidated net worth metric, total adjusted capital metric, debt-to-capitalization ratio and liquidity metric (including, in each case, any component thereof) are each calculated as set forth in the credit agreement.
For purposes of determining EHI’s compliance with the foregoing financial covenants, the consolidated net worth metric, total adjusted capital metric, debt-to-capitalization ratio and liquidity metric (including, in each case, any component thereof) are each calculated as set forth in the credit agreement.
Risk Factors.” We are not undertaking any obligation to update any forward-looking statements or other statements we may make in the following discussion or elsewhere in this document even though these statements may be affected by events or circumstances 74 occurring after the forward-looking statements or other statements were made.
Risk Factors.” We are not undertaking any obligation to update any forward-looking statements or other statements we may make in the following discussion or elsewhere in this document even though these statements may be affected by events or circumstances occurring after the forward-looking statements or other statements were made.
Given the regulatory focus on the 108 reasonableness of an insurer’s surplus in relation to its outstanding liabilities and the adequacy of its surplus relative to its financial needs for any dividend, our insurance subsidiaries consider the minimum amount of policyholder surplus after giving effect to any contemplated future dividends.
Given the regulatory focus on the reasonableness of an insurer’s surplus in relation to its outstanding liabilities and the adequacy of its surplus relative to its financial needs for any dividend, our insurance subsidiaries consider the minimum amount of policyholder surplus after giving effect to any contemplated future dividends.
The model assesses the performance of new 76 business under expected and stress scenarios on an individualized loan basis, which is used to determine pricing and inform our risk selection strategy that optimizes economic value by balancing return and volatility.
The model assesses the performance of new business under expected and stress scenarios on an individualized loan basis, which is used to determine pricing and inform our risk selection strategy that optimizes economic value by balancing return and volatility.
Trends in 90 the profitability of our fundamental operating activities can be more clearly identified without the fluctuations of these realized gains and losses. We do not view them to be indicative of our fundamental operating activities. Therefore, these items are excluded from our calculation of adjusted operating income.
Trends in the profitability of our fundamental operating activities can be more clearly identified without the fluctuations of these realized gains and losses. We do not view them to be indicative of our fundamental operating activities. Therefore, these items are excluded from our calculation of adjusted operating income.
On October 24, 2022, the FHFA announced two initiatives : 1) t argeted changes to the GSEs’ guarantee fee pricing by eliminating upfront fees for certain borrowers and affordable mortgage products, while implementing targeted increases to the upfront fees for most cash-out refinance loans; and 2) the validation and approval of both the FICO 10T credit score model and the VantageScore 4.0 credit score model for use by the GSEs as well as changing the requirement that lenders provide credit reports from all three nationwide consumer reporting agencies and instead only require credit reports from two of the three nationwide credit reporting agencies.
On October 24, 2022, the FHFA announced two initiatives : 1) t argeted changes to the GSEs’ guarantee fee pricing by eliminating upfront fees for certain borrowers and affordable mortgage products, while implementing targeted increases to the upfront fees for most cash-out refinance loans; and 2) the validation and approval of both the FICO 10T credit score model and the VantageScore 4.0 credit score model for use by the GSEs as well as changing the requirement that lenders provide credit reports from all three nationwide consumer reporting agencies and instead only requiring credit reports from two of the three nationwide credit reporting agencies.
As a result, minimum policyholder surplus could be a limitation on the future dividends of our regulated operating subsidiaries. As mentioned above, another consideration in the development of the dividend strategies for our regulated insurance operating subsidiaries is our expected level of compliance with PMIERs.
As a result, minimum policyholder surplus could be a limitation on the future dividends of our regulated operating subsidiaries. 100 As mentioned above, another consideration in the development of the dividend strategies for our regulated insurance operating subsidiaries is our expected level of compliance with PMIERs.
We expect the timing and amount of any future share repurchases will be opportunistic and will depend on a variety of factors, including EHI’s share price, capital availability, business and market conditions, regulatory requirements, and debt covenant restrictions.
We expect the timing and amount of any 79 future share repurchases will be opportunistic and will depend on a variety of factors, including EHI’s share price, capital availability, business and market conditions, regulatory requirements, and debt covenant restrictions.
(2) Includes the District of Columbia. 100 The table below sets forth our primary delinquency rates for the ten largest states by our primary RIF as of December 31, 2021: Percent of RIF Percent of direct primary case reserves Delinquency rate By state: California 11 % 12 % 3.17 % Texas 8 8 2.89 % Florida (1) 7 9 2.97 % New York (1) 5 12 3.80 % Illinois (1) 5 6 3.09 % Michigan 4 2 1.87 % Arizona 4 2 2.31 % North Carolina 3 2 2.18 % Pennsylvania (1) 3 3 2.38 % Washington 3 3 2.98 % All other states (2) 47 41 2.46 % Total 100 % 100 % 2.65 % ______________ (1) Jurisdiction predominantly uses a judicial foreclosure process, which generally increases the amount of time it takes for a foreclosure to be completed.
The table below sets forth our primary delinquency rates for the ten largest states by our primary RIF as of December 31, 2021: Percent of RIF Percent of direct primary case reserves Delinquency rate By state: California 11 % 12 % 3.17 % Texas 8 8 2.89 % Florida (1) 7 9 2.97 % New York (1) 5 12 3.80 % Illinois (1) 5 6 3.09 % Michigan 4 2 1.87 % Arizona 4 2 2.31 % North Carolina 3 2 2.18 % Pennsylvania (1) 3 3 2.38 % Washington 3 3 2.98 % All other states (2) 47 41 2.46 % Total 100 % 100 % 2.65 % ______________ (1) Jurisdiction predominantly uses a judicial foreclosure process, which generally increases the amount of time it takes for a foreclosure to be completed.
Incurred losses are generally affected by macroeconomic conditions, borrower credit 75 quality, certain loan attributes, underwriting quality and our loss mitigation efforts among other factors detailed below.
Incurred losses are generally affected by macroeconomic conditions, borrower credit quality, certain loan attributes, underwriting quality and our loss mitigation efforts among other factors detailed below.
These deferred acquisition costs are referred to as “DAC.” The ongoing maintenance expenses of our insurance contracts are generally fixed in nature and include costs such as information technology, finance and legal, among others, including costs allocated from our Parent for certain activities on our behalf. See Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements regarding our related party transactions.
These deferred acquisition costs are referred to as “DAC.” The ongoing maintenance expenses of our insurance contracts are generally fixed in nature and include costs such as information technology, finance and legal, among others, including costs allocated from Genworth for certain activities on our behalf. See Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements regarding our related party transactions.
In addition to the restrictions described above, all dividends from EHI are subject to Parent consent and EHI Board of Directors approval. Risk-to-Capital Ratio We compute our RTC ratio on a separate company statutory basis, as well as for our combined insurance operations. The RTC ratio is net RIF divided by policyholders’ surplus plus statutory contingency reserve.
In addition to the restrictions described above, all dividends from EHI are subject to Genworth consent and EHI Board of Directors approval. Risk-to-Capital Ratio We compute our RTC ratio on a separate company statutory basis, as well as for our combined insurance operations. The RTC ratio is net RIF divided by policyholders’ surplus plus statutory contingency reserve.
The following table presents the weighted average mortgage interest rate on outstanding primary IIF as of December 31, 2022, excluding our run-off business. Prepayment speeds may be affected by changes in interest rates, among other factors. An increasing interest rate environment generally will reduce refinancing activity and result in lower prepayments.
The following table presents the weighted average mortgage interest rate on outstanding primary IIF as of December 31, 2023, excluding our run-off business. Prepayment speeds may be affected by changes in interest rates, among other factors. An increasing interest rate environment generally will reduce refinancing activity and result in lower prepayments.
Ultimately, we expect our new insurance written with its strong credit profile and attractive pricing to positively contribute to our future profitability and return on equity.
Ultimately, we expect our new insurance written with its strong credit profile and attractive pricing to positively contribute to our future profitability and return on equity. Our portfolio.
We also cannot predict the impact on our ratings or future ratings of actions taken with respect to our Parent. The following EMICO financial strength ratings have been independently assigned by third-party rating organizations and represent our current ratings, which are subject to change. Name of Agency Rating Outlook Change Date of Rating Moody’s Investor Service, Inc.
We also cannot predict the impact on our ratings or future ratings of actions taken with respect to Genworth. The following EMICO financial strength ratings have been independently assigned by third-party rating organizations and represent our current ratings, which are subject to change. Name of Agency Rating Outlook Change Date of Rating Moody’s Investor Service, Inc.
We also consider all available information relevant to the collectability of the security, including information about past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts, when developing the estimate of cash flows expected to be collected. There is no recorded allowance for credit losses on available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2022.
We also consider all available information relevant to the collectability of the security, including information about past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts, when developing the estimate of cash flows expected to be collected. There is no recorded allowance for credit losses on available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2023.
The table 99 below sets forth our primary delinquency rates for the ten largest states by our primary RIF as of December 31, 2022: Percent of RIF Percent of direct primary case reserves Delinquency rate By state: California 12 % 10 % 2.09 % Texas 8 7 2.12 % Florida (1) 8 8 2.54 % New York (1) 5 13 2.95 % Illinois (1) 5 6 2.54 % Arizona 4 2 1.78 % Michigan 4 3 1.79 % North Carolina 3 3 1.59 % Georgia 3 3 2.23 % Washington 3 3 1.92 % All other states (2) 45 42 1.94 % Total 100 % 100 % 2.08 % ______________ (1) Jurisdiction predominantly uses a judicial foreclosure process, which generally increases the amount of time it takes for a foreclosure to be completed.
(2) Includes the District of Columbia. 92 The table below sets forth our primary delinquency rates for the ten largest states by our primary RIF as of December 31, 2022: Percent of RIF Percent of direct primary case reserves Delinquency rate By state: California 12 % 10 % 2.09 % Texas 8 7 2.12 % Florida (1) 8 8 2.54 % New York (1) 5 13 2.95 % Illinois (1) 5 6 2.54 % Arizona 4 2 1.78 % Michigan 4 3 1.79 % North Carolina 3 3 1.59 % Georgia 3 3 2.23 % Washington 3 3 1.92 % All other states (2) 45 42 1.94 % Total 100 % 100 % 2.08 % ______________ (1) Jurisdiction predominantly uses a judicial foreclosure process, which generally increases the amount of time it takes for a foreclosure to be completed.
Because our insurance premiums are earned over the life of a policy, higher or lower persistency rates can have a significant impact on our profitability. The rise of interest rates throughout 2022 has significantly increased persistency in the portfolio, but this impact is partially offset by lower NIW.
Because our insurance premiums are earned over the life of a policy, higher or lower persistency rates can have a significant impact on our profitability. The rise of interest rates throughout 2022 and 2023 has significantly increased persistency in the portfolio, but this impact is partially offset by lower NIW.
This is in line with market trends as rising mortgage rates and recent home price appreciation have put pressure on affordability. We believe the levels are in line with our current risk appetite as we consider layered risk across multiple risk attributes, pricing and our portfolio credit mix.
This is in line with market trends as elevated mortgage rates and recent home price appreciation have put pressure on affordability. We believe the levels are in line with our current risk appetite as we consider layered risk across multiple risk attributes, pricing and our portfolio credit mix.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations The following discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 included in Item 8 of this Annual Report.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations The following discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 included in Item 8 of this Annual Report.
Likewise, if primary persistency rates declined on our existing insurance in-force by 10%, earned premiums would decline by approximately $94 million during the first full year, partially offset by higher policy cancellations in our single premium products.
Likewise, if primary persistency rates declined on our existing insurance in-force by 10%, earned premiums would decline by approximately $96 million during the first full year, partially offset by higher policy cancellations in our single premium products.
We currently have no material financing commitments, such as drawn lines of credit or guarantees, that are expected to affect our liquidity over the next five years, other than the 2025 Senior Notes. Financial Strength Ratings Ratings with respect to the financial strength of operating subsidiaries are an important factor in establishing the competitive position of insurance companies.
We currently have no material financing commitments, such as lines of credit or guarantees, that are expected to affect our liquidity over the next five years, other than the 2025 Senior Notes and the Facility. Financial Strength Ratings Ratings with respect to the financial strength of operating subsidiaries are an important factor in establishing the competitive position of insurance companies.
We continue to hold reserves as of December 31, 2022, related to delinquencies from borrower forbearance programs due to COVID-19. We have seen COVID-19-related delinquencies cure above expectations, but reserves recorded related to borrower forbearance have a high degree of estimation.
We continue to hold reserves as of December 31, 2023, related to delinquencies from borrower forbearance programs due to COVID-19. We have seen COVID-19-related delinquencies cure above expectations, but reserves recorded related to borrower forbearance have a high degree of estimation.
The changes marked the third iteration of FHFA’s ongoing pricing review since early last year and impact purchase and rate-term refinance loans. Pricing grids are now broken out by loan purpose and are recalibrated to new credit score and loan-to-value ratio categories along with associated loan attributes.
The changes marked the third iteration of the FHFA’s ongoing pricing review since early 2022 and impact purchase and rate-term refinance loans. Pricing grids are now broken out by loan purpose and are recalibrated to new credit score and loan-to-value ratio categories along with associated loan attributes.
Our net premiums earned (i.e., materially, the gross premiums charged less premiums ceded as part of our CRT program) represent the largest source of our revenues. Importantly, our CRT program helps to de-risk our operating model and spread the risk of loss across our counterparties while also providing capital relief.
Our net premiums earned (i.e., materially, the gross premiums charged less premiums ceded as part of our CRT program) represent the largest source of our revenues. Importantly, our CRT program helps to manage risk in our operating model and spread the risk of loss across our counterparties while also providing capital relief.
Although uncertainty remains with respect to the ultimate losses we will experience on these policy years, they have become a smaller percentage of our total mortgage insurance portfolio. The largest portion of loss reserves has shifted to newer book years in line with changes in RIF.
Although uncertainty remains with respect to the ultimate losses we will experience on these policy years, they have become a smaller percentage of our total mortgage insurance portfolio. Loss reserves have shifted to newer book years in line with changes in RIF.
For example, a decline in primary new insurance written of $1.0 billion would result in a reduction in earned premiums of approximately $3 million in the first full year.
For example, a decline in primary new insurance written of $1.0 billion would result in a reduction in earned premiums of approximately $4 million in the first full year.
We have no derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio. As of December 31, 2022, December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, 98%, 97% and 98% of our investment portfolio was rated investment grade, respectively.
We have no derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio. As of December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, 98%, 98% and 97% of our investment portfolio was rated investment grade, respectively.
For example, widening credit spreads will generally result in a decrease, while tightening of credit spreads will generally result in an increase, in the fair value of our fixed maturity securities. As well, during periods of increasing interest rates, the market values of lower-yielding assets will decline.
For example, widening credit spreads will generally result in a decrease, while tightening of credit spreads will generally result in an increase in the fair value of our fixed maturity securities. Also, during periods of increasing interest rates, the market values of lower-yielding assets will decline.
We also employ a CRT program to transfer a portion of our risk through both traditional XOL reinsurance arrangements and the issuance of ILNs. In exchange, we cede a negotiated amount of our premiums to the reinsurers and ILN investors that participate in our CRT transactions.
We also employ a CRT program to transfer a portion of our risk through traditional XOL and quota share reinsurance arrangements and the issuance of ILNs. In exchange, we cede a negotiated amount of our premiums to the reinsurers and ILN investors that participate in our CRT transactions.
Private mortgage insurance market penetration and eventual market size are affected in part by actions that impact housing or housing finance policy taken by the GSEs and the U.S. government, including but not limited to, the FHA and the FHFA.
Private mortgage insurance market penetration and eventual market size are affected in part by actions that impact housing or housing finance policy taken by the GSEs and the U.S. government, including but not limited to, the Federal Housing Administration and the FHFA.
Pre-foreclosure sales, acquisitions and other early workout and claim administration actions help to reduce overall claim severity. Our average primary mortgage insurance claim severity was 94%, 103% and 106% for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The 2022 average claim severity was impacted by low claim volumes and lifetime home price appreciation.
Pre-foreclosure sales, acquisitions and other early workout and claim administration actions help to reduce overall claim severity. Our average primary mortgage insurance claim severity was 97%, 94% and 103% for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The 2023 average claim severity was impacted by low claim volumes and lifetime home price appreciation.
Our investment portfolio primarily consists of a diverse mix of highly rated fixed income securities and is designed to achieve the following objectives: • Meet policyholder obligations through maintenance of sufficient liquidity; • Preserve capital; • Generate investment income; • Maximize statutory capital; and • Increase value to our Parent and its stockholders, among other objectives. 105 To achieve our portfolio objectives, our investment strategy focuses primarily on: • Our business outlook, current and expected future investment conditions; • Investments selection based on fundamental, research-driven strategies; • Diversification across a mix of fixed income, low-volatility investments while actively pursuing strategies to enhance yield; • Regular evaluation and optimization of our asset class mix; • Continuous monitoring of investment quality, duration and liquidity; • Regulatory capital requirements; and • Restriction of investments correlated to the residential mortgage market.
Our investment portfolio primarily consists of a diverse mix of highly rated fixed maturity securities and is designed to achieve the following objectives: • Meet policyholder obligations through maintenance of sufficient liquidity; • Preserve capital; • Generate investment income; • Maximize statutory capital; and • Increase shareholder value, among other objectives. 97 To achieve our portfolio objectives, our investment strategy focuses primarily on: • Our business outlook, including current and expected future investment conditions; • Investments selection based on fundamental, research-driven strategies; • Diversification across a mix of fixed income, low-volatility investments while actively pursuing strategies to enhance yield; • Regular evaluation and optimization of our asset class mix; • Continuous monitoring of investment quality, duration and liquidity; • Regulatory capital requirements; and • Restriction of investments correlated to the residential mortgage market.
Refer to Note 2 in our audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, for a discussion of recently adopted and not yet adopted accounting standards.
Refer to Note 2 in our audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, for a discussion of recently adopted and not yet adopted accounting standards. 103
EMICO’s ongoing risk-to-capital ratio will depend principally on the magnitude of future losses incurred by EMICO, the effectiveness of ongoing loss mitigation activities, new business volume and profitability, the amount of policy lapses and the amount of additional capital that is generated or distributed by the business.
EMICO’s ongoing risk-to-capital ratio will depend principally on the magnitude of future losses incurred by EMICO, the effectiveness of ongoing loss mitigation activities, new business volume and profitability, the impact of quota share reinsurance, the amount of policy lapses and the amount of additional capital that is generated or distributed by the business.
Based on our estimated statutory results and in accordance with applicable dividend restrictions, our insurance subsidiaries have the capacity to pay dividends of $292 million from unassigned surplus as of December 31, 2022, with 30-day advance notice to the Commissioner of the intent to pay.
Based on our estimated statutory results and in accordance with applicable dividend restrictions, our insurance subsidiaries have the capacity to pay dividends of $336 million from unassigned surplus as of December 31, 2023, with 30-day advance notice to the Commissioner of the intent to pay.
The upfront fees are eliminated for certain first-time home buyers with income at or below area median income and certain other GSE affordable housing product s. The fee reductions went into effect in the fourth quarter of 2022 while the new fees on cash-out refinance loans began February 1, 2023.
The upfront fees were eliminated for certain first-time home buyers with income at or below area median income and certain other GSE affordable housing products. The fee reductions went into effect in the fourth quarter of 2022, while the new fees on cash-out refinance loans began on February 1, 2023.
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, single premium policies comprised 12% and 13% of primary IIF, respectively. Credit Quality Improved analytics, stronger loan origination quality controls and the regulatory implementation of the QM Rule have resulted in a significant improvement in the credit quality for loans originated in the private mortgage insurance market over time.
As of 70 December 31, 2023 and 2022, single premium policies comprised 10% and 12% of primary IIF, respectively. Credit Quality Improved analytics, stronger loan origination quality controls and the regulatory implementation of the QM Rule have resulted in a significant improvement in the credit quality for loans originated in the private mortgage insurance market over time.
Insurance in-force and Risk in-force IIF increased largely from NIW and increased persistency in the current year, partially offset by lapses and cancellations. Primary persistency rate was 80% and 62% for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Insurance in-force and Risk in-force IIF increased largely from NIW and increased persistency in the current year, partially offset by lapses and cancellations. Primary persistency rate was 85% and 80% for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Liquidity As of December 31, 2022, we maintained liquidity in the form of cash and cash equivalents of $514 million compared to $426 million as of December 31, 2021, and we also held significant levels of 110 investment-grade fixed maturity securities that can be monetized should our cash and cash equivalents be insufficient to meet our obligations.
Liquidity As of December 31, 2023, we maintained liquidity in the form of cash and cash equivalents of $616 million compared to $514 million as of December 31, 2022, and we also held significant levels of investment-grade fixed maturity securities that can be monetized should our cash and cash equivalents be insufficient to meet our obligations.
Based on the composition of our insurance portfolio, with monthly premium policies comprising a larger proportion of our total portfolio than single premium policies, an increase or decrease in IIF generally has a corresponding impact on premiums earned.
IIF is one of the primary drivers of our future earned premium. Based on the composition of our insurance portfolio, with monthly premium policies comprising a larger proportion of our total portfolio than single premium policies, an increase or decrease in IIF generally has a corresponding impact on premiums earned.
For example, based on our actual experience during the three-year period immediately preceding December 31, 2022, a change of 6 percentage points, or 15%, in the average claim rate would change the gross loss reserve amount for such quarter by approximately $80 million.
For example, based on our actual experience during the three-year period immediately preceding December 31, 2023, a change of 5 percentage points, or 15%, in the average claim rate would change the gross loss reserve amount for such quarter by approximately $75 million.
The Facility may be used for working capital needs and general corporate purposes, including the execution of dividends to our shareholders and capital contributions to our insurance subsidiaries. The Facility remains undrawn as of December 31, 2022. The principal sources of liquidity in our business currently include insurance premiums, net investment income and cash flows from investment sales and maturities.
The Facility may be used for working capital needs and general corporate purposes, including the execution of dividends to our shareholders and capital contributions to our insurance subsidiaries. The Facility has remained undrawn through December 31, 2023. The principal sources of liquidity in our business currently include insurance premiums, net investment income and cash flows from investment sales and maturities.
Unearned premium was $203 million as of December 31, 2022, a decrease of $44 million compared to December 31, 2021. Changes in market conditions could cause a decline in mortgage originations, mortgage insurance penetration rates, persistency and our market share, all of which could impact new insurance written.
Unearned premium was $149 million as of December 31, 2023, a decrease of $53 million compared to December 31, 2022. Changes in market conditions could cause a decline in mortgage originations, mortgage insurance penetration rates, persistency and our market share, all of which could impact new insurance written.
The following table presents the security ratings of our fixed maturity securities as of the dates indicated: December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 December 31, 2020 AAA 10 % 9 % 11 % AA 16 17 13 A 34 34 36 BBB 38 37 38 BB & below 2 3 2 Total 100 % 100 % 100 % 106 The table below presents the effective duration and investment yield on our investments available-for-sale, excluding cash and cash equivalents: December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 December 31, 2020 Duration (in years) 3.6 3.9 3.4 Pre-tax yield (% of average investment portfolio assets) 3.1 % 2.7 % 2.8 % We manage credit risk by analyzing issuers, transaction structures and any associated collateral.
The following table presents the security ratings of our fixed maturity securities as of the dates indicated: December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 AAA 10 % 10 % 9 % AA 20 16 17 A 33 34 34 BBB 35 38 37 BB & below 2 2 3 Total 100 % 100 % 100 % 98 The table below presents the effective duration and investment yield on our investments available-for-sale, excluding cash and cash equivalents: December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 Duration (in years) 3.5 3.6 3.9 Pre-tax yield (% of average investment portfolio assets) 3.6 % 3.1 % 2.7 % We manage credit risk by analyzing issuers, transaction structures and any associated collateral.
Future dividend payments are subject to quarterly review and approval by our Board of Directors and Genworth and will be targeted to be paid in the third month of each subsequent quarter. In April and October of 2022, our primary mortgage insurance operating company, EMICO, completed distributions to EHI supporting our ability to pay cash dividends.
Future dividend payments are subject to quarterly review and approval by our Board of Directors and Genworth and will be targeted to be paid in the third month of each subsequent quarter. In April and November 2023, our primary mortgage insurance operating company, EMICO, completed distributions to EHI that supported our ability to pay dividends in 2023.
The statutory contingency reserve is reported as a liability on the statutory balance sheet. Certain states have insurance laws or regulations that require a mortgage insurer to maintain a minimum amount of statutory capital (including the statutory contingency reserve) relative to its level of RIF in order for the mortgage insurer to continue to write new business.
Certain states have insurance laws or regulations that require a mortgage insurer to maintain a minimum amount of statutory capital (including the statutory contingency reserve) relative to its level of RIF in order for the mortgage insurer to continue to write new business.
Likewise, a change of 6 percentage points, or a change of 5%, in the average severity rate would change the gross loss reserve amount for such quarter by approximately $26 million.
Likewise, a change of 4 percentage points, or a change of 4%, in the average severity rate would change the gross loss reserve amount for such quarter by approximately $19 million.
The plans are in their early stages, and we will continue to work with the FHFA, the GSEs, and the broader housing finance industry as these proposals develop and to the extent they are implemented.
We will continue to work with the FHFA, the GSEs, and the broader housing finance industry as these proposals develop and to the extent they are implemented.
Liquidity and Capital Resources Cash Flows The following table summarizes our consolidated cash flows for the years ended December 31: (Amounts in thousands) 2022 2021 2020 Net cash provided by (used in): Operating activities $ 560,510 $ 572,110 $ 704,350 Investing activities (220,255) (398,782) (1,136,912) Financing activities (252,308) (200,294) 300,298 Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents $ 87,947 $ (26,966) $ (132,264) Our most significant source of operating cash flows is from premiums received from our insurance policies, while our most significant uses of operating cash flows are generally for claims paid on our insured policies and our operating expenses.
Liquidity and Capital Resources Cash Flows The following table summarizes our consolidated cash flows for the years ended December 31: (Amounts in thousands) 2023 2022 2021 Net cash provided by (used in): Operating activities $ 632,038 $ 560,510 $ 572,110 Investing activities (229,404) (220,255) (398,782) Financing activities (300,726) (252,308) (200,294) Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents $ 101,908 $ 87,947 $ (26,966) Our most significant source of operating cash flows is from premiums received from our insurance policies, while our most significant uses of operating cash flows are generally for claims paid on our insured policies and our operating expenses.
There is currently no implementation deadline, but this is expected to be a multiple year process that will require system and process updates along with coordination across stakeholders of the industry. In January 2023, the FHFA announced additional updates to its up-front fee structure and a recalibration and reformatting of their entire pricing matrix.
The FHFA has announced preliminary implementation expectations, but this is expected to be a multiple year process that will require system and process updates along with coordination across stakeholders of the industry. In January 2023, the FHFA announced additional updates to its upfront fee structure and a recalibration and reformatting of their entire pricing matrix.
The following table presents the calculation of our RTC ratio for our principal insurance company, EMICO, as of the dates indicated: (Dollar amounts in millions) December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 December 31, 2020 Statutory policyholders’ surplus $ 1,084 $ 1,346 $ 1,475 Contingency reserves 3,548 3,041 2,518 Combined statutory capital $ 4,632 $ 4,387 $ 3,993 Adjusted RIF (1) $ 59,663 $ 54,033 $ 49,021 EMICO risk-to-capital ratio 12.9 12.3 12.3 ______________ (1) Adjusted RIF for purposes of calculating EMICO statutory RTC differs from RIF presented elsewhere herein.
The following table presents the calculation of our RTC ratio for our principal insurance company, EMICO, as of the dates indicated: (Dollar amounts in millions) December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 Statutory policyholders’ surplus $ 1,026 $ 1,084 $ 1,346 Contingency reserves 3,953 3,548 3,041 Combined statutory capital $ 4,979 $ 4,632 $ 4,387 Adjusted RIF (1) $ 57,788 $ 59,663 $ 54,033 EMICO risk-to-capital ratio 11.6 12.9 12.3 ______________ (1) Adjusted RIF for purposes of calculating EMICO statutory RTC differs from RIF presented elsewhere herein.
The following table presents the calculation of our RTC ratio for our combined insurance subsidiaries as of the dates indicated: (Dollar amounts in millions) December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 December 31, 2020 Statutory policyholders’ surplus $ 1,136 $ 1,397 $ 1,555 Contingency reserves 3,551 3,042 2,518 Combined statutory capital $ 4,687 $ 4,439 $ 4,073 Adjusted RIF (1) $ 60,061 $ 54,201 $ 49,104 Combined risk-to-capital ratio 12.8 12.2 12.1 ______________ (1) Adjusted RIF for purposes of calculating combined statutory RTC differs from RIF presented elsewhere herein.
The following table presents the calculation of our RTC ratio for our combined insurance subsidiaries as of the dates indicated: (Dollar amounts in millions) December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 Statutory policyholders’ surplus $ 1,085 $ 1,136 $ 1,397 Contingency reserves 3,960 3,551 3,042 Combined statutory capital $ 5,045 $ 4,687 $ 4,439 Adjusted RIF (1) $ 58,277 $ 60,061 $ 54,201 Combined risk-to-capital ratio 11.6 12.8 12.2 ______________ (1) Adjusted RIF for purposes of calculating combined statutory RTC differs from RIF presented elsewhere herein.
(2) Includes the District of Columbia . 101 The table below sets forth our primary delinquency rates for the ten largest Metropolitan Statistical Areas (“MSA”) or Metro Divisions (“MD”) by our primary RIF as of December 31, 2022: Percent of RIF Percent of direct primary case reserves Delinquency rate By MSA or MD: Chicago-Naperville, IL MD 3 % 5 % 2.84 % Phoenix, AZ MSA 3 2 1.83 % New York, NY MD 3 8 3.75 % Atlanta, GA MSA 2 3 2.42 % Washington-Arlington, DC MD 2 2 1.85 % Houston, TX MSA 2 3 2.60 % Riverside-San Bernardino CA MSA 2 2 2.89 % Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA MD 2 2 2.18 % Dallas, TX MD 2 1 1.86 % Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO MSA 2 1 1.12 % All other MSAs/MDs 77 71 2.00 % Total 100 % 100 % 2.08 % The table below sets forth our primary delinquency rates for the ten largest MSAs or MDs by our primary RIF as of December 31, 2021: Percent of RIF Percent of direct primary case reserves Delinquency rate By MSA or MD: Chicago-Naperville, IL MD 3 % 4 % 3.68 % Phoenix, AZ MSA 3 2 2.36 % New York, NY MD 3 8 5.32 % Atlanta, GA MSA 2 3 3.28 % Washington-Arlington, DC MD 2 2 2.96 % Houston, TX MSA 2 3 3.61 % Riverside-San Bernardino, CA MSA 2 2 3.42 % Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA MD 2 3 3.95 % Dallas, TX MD 2 2 2.31 % Nassau County, NY MD 2 4 5.55 % All other MSAs/MDs 77 67 2.44 % Total 100 % 100 % 2.65 % 102 The table below sets forth our primary delinquency rates for the ten largest MSAs or MDs by our primary RIF as of December 31, 2020: Percent of RIF Percent of direct primary case reserves Delinquency rate By MSA or MD: Chicago-Naperville, IL MD 3 % 4 % 6.36 % Phoenix, AZ MSA 3 2 4.63 % New York, NY MD 3 8 10.25 % Atlanta, GA MSA 2 3 6.68 % Washington-Arlington, DC MD 2 2 6.09 % Houston, TX MSA 2 3 7.59 % Riverside-San Bernardino, CA MSA 2 2 7.08 % Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA MD 2 2 7.57 % Dallas, TX MD 2 2 5.10 % Seattle-Bellevue, WA MD 2 2 6.33 % All other MSAs/MDs 77 70 4.43 % Total 100 % 100 % 4.86 % The number of delinquencies often does not correlate directly with the number of claims received because delinquencies may cure.
(2) Includes the District of Columbia . 93 The table below sets forth our primary delinquency rates for the ten largest MSAs or MDs by our primary RIF as of December 31, 2023: Percent of RIF Percent of direct primary case reserves Delinquency rate By MSA or MD: Phoenix, AZ MSA 3 % 2 % 2.01 % Chicago-Naperville, IL MD 3 4 2.88 % Atlanta, GA MSA 3 3 2.40 % New York, NY MD 2 7 3.60 % Washington-Arlington, DC MD 2 2 2.01 % Houston, TX MSA 2 3 2.67 % Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA MD 2 2 2.39 % Dallas, TX MD 2 2 1.92 % Riverside-San Bernardino, CA MSA 2 3 2.83 % Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO MSA 2 1 1.12 % All Other MSAs/MDs 77 71 2.01 % Total 100 % 100 % 2.10 % The table below sets forth our primary delinquency rates for the ten largest MSAs or MDs by our primary RIF as of December 31, 2022: Percent of RIF Percent of direct primary case reserves Delinquency rate By MSA or MD: Chicago-Naperville, IL MD 3 % 5 % 2.84 % Phoenix, AZ MSA 3 2 1.83 % New York, NY MD 3 8 3.75 % Atlanta, GA MSA 2 3 2.42 % Washington-Arlington, DC MD 2 2 1.85 % Houston, TX MSA 2 3 2.60 % Riverside-San Bernardino, CA MSA 2 2 2.89 % Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA MD 2 2 2.18 % Dallas, TX MD 2 1 1.86 % Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO MSA 2 1 1.12 % All Other MSAs/MDs 77 71 2.00 % Total 100 % 100 % 2.08 % 94 The table below sets forth our primary delinquency rates for the ten largest MSAs or MDs by our primary RIF as of December 31, 2021: Percent of RIF Percent of direct primary case reserves Delinquency rate By MSA or MD: Chicago-Naperville, IL MD 3 % 4 % 3.68 % Phoenix, AZ MSA 3 2 2.36 % New York, NY MD 3 8 5.32 % Atlanta, GA MSA 2 3 3.28 % Washington-Arlington, DC MD 2 2 2.96 % Houston, TX MSA 2 3 3.61 % Riverside-San Bernardino, CA MSA 2 2 3.42 % Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA MD 2 3 3.95 % Dallas, TX MD 2 2 2.31 % Nassau County, NY MD 2 4 5.55 % All Other MSAs/MDs 77 67 2.44 % Total 100 % 100 % 2.65 % The number of delinquencies often does not correlate directly with the number of claims received because delinquencies may cure.
As of December 31, 2022, we had estimated available assets of $5,206 million against $3,156 million net required assets under PMIERs compared to available assets of $5,077 million against $3,074 million net required assets as of December 31, 2021.
As of December 31, 2023, we had estimated available assets of $5,006 million against $3,119 million net required assets under PMIERs compared to available assets of $5,206 million against $3,156 million net required assets as of December 31, 2022.
We do not believe this net impact will be material. The U.S. private mortgage insurance industry is highly competitive. Our market share is influenced by the execution of our go to market strategy, including but not limited to, pricing competitiveness relative to our peers and our selective participation in forward commitment transactions.
The U.S. private mortgage insurance industry is highly competitive. Our market share is influenced by the execution of our go to market strategy, including but not limited to, 76 pricing competitiveness relative to our peers and our selective participation in forward commitment transactions.
The metrics provided in this section exclude activity related to our run-off business, which is immaterial to our consolidated results of operations.
The metrics provided in this section are on a direct basis and exclude activity related to our run-off business, which is immaterial to our consolidated results of operations.
Therefore, we typically experience lower levels of losses resulting from favorable delinquency activity in the first and second quarters, as typically compared to the third and fourth quarters. As a result of delinquencies from COVID-19 and subsequent cure activity, trends from the last two years may not follow traditional seasonality.
Therefore, we typically experience lower levels of losses resulting from favorable delinquency activity in the first and second quarters, as typically compared to the third and fourth quarters. As a result of delinquencies from COVID-19 and subsequent cure activity, including the impact of forbearance policies on delinquency recognition and performance recent trends may not follow traditional seasonality.
(2) Expense ratio is calculated by dividing acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, plus amortization of DAC and intangibles by net earned premiums.
(2) Expense ratio is calculated by dividing acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, plus amortization of DAC and intangibles by net earned premiums. (3) Net earned premium rate is calculated by dividing earned premium by average primary IIF.
The following table includes a reconciliation of net income to adjusted operating income for the years ended December 31: (Amounts in thousands) 2022 2021 2020 Net income $ 704,157 $ 546,685 $ 370,421 Adjustments to net income: Net investment (gains) losses 2,036 2,124 3,324 Costs associated with reorganization 3,461 2,744 — Taxes on adjustments (1,155) (1,022) (698) Adjusted operating income $ 708,499 $ 550,531 $ 373,047 We recorded a pre-tax expense of $3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, related to restructuring costs as we evaluate and appropriately size our organizational needs and expenses.
The following table includes a reconciliation of net income to adjusted operating income for the years ended December 31: (Amounts in thousands) 2023 2022 2021 Net income $ 665,511 $ 704,157 $ 546,685 Adjustments to net income: Net investment (gains) losses 14,022 2,036 2,124 Costs associated with reorganization (131) 3,461 2,744 Taxes on adjustments (2,917) (1,155) (1,022) Adjusted operating income $ 676,485 $ 708,499 $ 550,531 82 We recorded a pre-tax expense of $3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, related to restructuring costs as we evaluated and appropriately sized our organizational needs and expenses.
Detailed discussions of our consolidated results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020, including the year-over-year comparisons between 2021 and 2020, that are not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K can be found in Item 7 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, filed with the SEC on February 28, 2022.
Detailed discussions of our consolidated results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2021, including the year-over-year comparisons between 2022 and 2021, that are not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K can be found in Item 7 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, filed with the SEC on February 28, 2023. 80 Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022 Revenues Premiums increased mainly attributable to higher average IIF.
Fixed Maturity Securities Available-for-Sale The following table presents the fair value of our fixed maturity securities available-for-sale as of the dates indicated: December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 December 31, 2020 (Amounts in thousands) Fair value % of total Fair value % of total Fair value % of total U.S. government, agencies and GSEs $ 44,769 0.9 % $ 58,408 1.1 % $ 138,224 2.7 % State and political subdivisions 419,856 8.6 538,453 10.2 187,377 3.7 Non-U.S. government 9,349 0.2 22,416 0.4 31,031 0.6 U.S. corporate 2,646,863 54.2 2,945,303 55.9 2,888,625 57.3 Non-U.S. corporate 652,844 13.4 666,594 12.7 607,669 12.0 Residential mortgage-backed 11,043 0.2 — — — — Other asset-backed 1,100,036 22.5 1,035,165 19.7 1,193,670 23.7 Total available-for-sale fixed maturity securities $ 4,884,760 100.0 % $ 5,266,339 100.0 % $ 5,046,596 100.0 % Our investment portfolio did not include any direct residential real estate or whole mortgage loans as of December 31, 2022 or December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020.
Fixed Maturity Securities Available-for-Sale The following table presents the fair value of our fixed maturity securities available-for-sale as of the dates indicated: December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 (Amounts in thousands) Fair value % of total Fair value % of total Fair value % of total U.S. government, agencies and GSEs $ 195,129 3.7 % $ 44,769 0.9 % $ 58,408 1.1 % State and political subdivisions 438,214 8.3 419,856 8.6 538,453 10.2 Non-U.S. government 11,467 0.2 9,349 0.2 22,416 0.4 U.S. corporate 2,723,730 51.8 2,646,863 54.2 2,945,303 55.9 Non-U.S. corporate 689,663 13.1 652,844 13.4 666,594 12.7 Residential mortgage-backed 10,755 0.2 11,043 0.2 — — Other asset-backed 1,197,183 22.7 1,100,036 22.5 1,035,165 19.7 Total available-for-sale fixed maturity securities $ 5,266,141 100.0 % $ 4,884,760 100.0 % $ 5,266,339 100.0 % Our investment portfolio did not include any direct residential real estate or whole mortgage loans as of December 31, 2023, December 31, 2022 or December 31, 2021.
In most cases, delinquencies that are not cured result in a claim under our policy. 97 The following table shows a roll forward of the number of primary loans in default for the years ended December 31: (Loan count) 2022 2021 2020 Number of delinquencies, beginning of period 24,820 44,904 16,392 New defaults 35,996 32,624 85,074 Cures (40,278) (51,626) (55,396) Claims paid (574) (1,050) (1,148) Rescissions and claim denials (21) (32) (18) Number of delinquencies, end of period 19,943 24,820 44,904 The following table sets forth changes in our direct primary case loss reserves for the years ended December 31: (Amounts in thousands) (1) 2022 2021 2020 Loss reserves, beginning of period $ 606,102 $ 516,863 $ 204,749 Claims paid (28,123) (32,816) (52,389) Increase in reserves (98,636) 122,055 364,503 Loss reserves, end of period $ 479,343 $ 606,102 $ 516,863 ______________ (1) Direct primary case reserves exclude LAE, pool, IBNR and reinsurance reserves.
In most cases, delinquencies that are not cured result in a claim under our policy. 89 The following table shows a roll forward of the number of primary loans in default for the years ended December 31: (Loan count) 2023 2022 2021 Number of delinquencies, beginning of period 19,943 24,820 44,904 New defaults 41,617 35,996 32,624 Cures (40,475) (40,278) (51,626) Claims paid (615) (574) (1,050) Rescissions and claim denials (38) (21) (32) Number of delinquencies, end of period 20,432 19,943 24,820 The following table sets forth changes in our direct primary case loss reserves for the years ended December 31: (Amounts in thousands) (1) 2023 2022 2021 Loss reserves, beginning of period $ 479,343 $ 606,102 $ 516,863 Claims paid (23,357) (28,123) (32,816) Increase in reserves 20,723 (98,636) 122,055 Loss reserves, end of period $ 476,709 $ 479,343 $ 606,102 ______________ (1) Direct primary case reserves exclude LAE, pool, IBNR and reinsurance reserves.
The following table shows incurred losses related to current and prior accident years for the years ended December 31: (Amounts in thousands) 2022 2021 2020 Losses and LAE incurred related to current accident year $ 219,461 $ 141,225 $ 364,548 Losses and LAE incurred related to prior accident years (313,652) (15,822) 16,202 Total incurred (1) $ (94,191) $ 125,403 $ 380,750 _______________ (1) Excludes run-off business.
The following table shows incurred losses related to current and prior accident years for the years ended December 31: (Amounts in thousands) 2023 2022 2021 Losses and LAE incurred related to current accident year $ 275,418 $ 219,461 $ 141,225 Losses and LAE incurred related to prior accident years (248,214) (313,652) (15,822) Total incurred (1) $ 27,204 $ (94,191) $ 125,403 _______________ (1) Excludes run-off business.
The following table sets forth the dispersion of primary RIF and loss reserves by policy year and delinquency rates as of December 31, 2021: Percent of RIF Percent of direct primary case reserves Delinquency rate Cumulative delinquency rate (1) Policy year: 2008 and prior 3 % 24 % 10.54 % 5.59 % 2009 to 2013 1 2 5.54 % 0.74 % 2014 1 3 5.51 % 0.99 % 2015 2 5 4.24 % 1.04 % 2016 4 8 3.69 % 1.16 % 2017 4 10 4.78 % 1.56 % 2018 4 13 5.93 % 1.88 % 2019 10 19 3.89 % 1.68 % 2020 31 14 1.50 % 1.14 % 2021 40 2 0.37 % 0.36 % Total portfolio 100 % 100 % 2.65 % 4.42 % ______________ (1) Calculated as the sum of the number of policies where claims were ever paid to date and number of policies for loans currently in default divided by policies ever in-force. 104 The following table sets forth the dispersion of primary RIF and loss reserves by policy year and delinquency rates as of December 31, 2020: Percent of RIF Percent of direct primary case reserves Delinquency rate Cumulative delinquency rate (1) Policy year: 2008 and prior 5 % 28 % 13.68 % 5.66 % 2009 to 2013 2 2 5.44 % 0.91 % 2014 2 3 6.06 % 1.57 % 2015 4 5 5.66 % 1.97 % 2016 8 9 5.46 % 2.49 % 2017 8 12 6.51 % 3.34 % 2018 8 14 7.70 % 4.01 % 2019 19 19 5.60 % 3.93 % 2020 44 8 1.09 % 1.04 % Total portfolio 100 % 100 % 4.86 % 4.86 % ______________ (1) Calculated as the sum of the number of policies where claims were ever paid to date and number of policies for loans currently in default divided by policies ever in-force.
The following table sets forth the dispersion of primary RIF and loss reserves by policy year and delinquency rates as of December 31, 2022: Percent of RIF Percent of direct primary case reserves Delinquency rate Cumulative delinquency rate (1) Policy year: 2008 and prior 3 % 26 % 9.61 % 5.57 % 2009-2014 1 4 5.01 % 0.69 % 2015 1 3 3.61 % 0.71 % 2016 3 6 3.17 % 0.81 % 2017 3 7 3.78 % 1.01 % 2018 3 9 4.63 % 1.18 % 2019 7 11 2.71 % 0.93 % 2020 22 17 1.47 % 0.92 % 2021 32 14 1.20 % 1.06 % 2022 25 3 0.54 % 0.52 % Total portfolio 100 % 100 % 2.08 % 4.26 % ______________ (1) Calculated as the sum of the number of policies where claims were ever paid to date and number of policies for loans currently in default divided by policies ever in-force. 96 The following table sets forth the dispersion of primary RIF and loss reserves by policy year and delinquency rates as of December 31, 2021: Percent of RIF Percent of direct primary case reserves Delinquency rate Cumulative delinquency rate (1) Policy year: 2008 and prior 3 % 24 % 10.54 % 5.59 % 2009-2013 1 2 5.54 % 0.74 % 2014 1 3 5.51 % 0.99 % 2015 2 5 4.24 % 1.04 % 2016 4 8 3.69 % 1.16 % 2017 4 10 4.78 % 1.56 % 2018 4 13 5.93 % 1.88 % 2019 10 19 3.89 % 1.68 % 2020 31 14 1.50 % 1.14 % 2021 40 2 0.37 % 0.36 % Total portfolio 100 % 100 % 2.65 % 4.42 % ______________ (1) Calculated as the sum of the number of policies where claims were ever paid to date and number of policies for loans currently in default divided by policies ever in-force.
The following table sets forth selected operating performance measures on a primary basis as of or for the years ended December 31: (Dollar amounts in millions) 2022 2021 2020 New insurance written $ 66,485 $ 97,004 $ 99,871 Primary insurance in-force (1) $ 248,262 $ 226,514 $ 207,947 Primary risk in-force $ 62,791 $ 56,881 $ 52,475 Persistency rate 80 % 62 % 59 % Policies in-force (count) 960,306 937,350 924,624 Delinquent loans (count) 19,943 24,820 44,904 Delinquency rate 2.08 % 2.65 % 4.86 % _______________ (1) Represents the aggregate unpaid principal balance for loans we insure.
The following table sets forth selected operating performance measures on a primary basis as of or for the years ended December 31: (Dollar amounts in millions) 2023 2022 2021 New insurance written $53,081 $66,485 $97,004 Primary insurance in-force (1) $262,937 $248,262 $226,514 Primary risk in-force $67,529 $62,791 $56,881 Persistency rate 85 % 80 % 62 % Primary policies in-force (count) 974,516 960,306 937,350 Delinquent loans (count) 20,432 19,943 24,820 Delinquency rate 2.10 % 2.08 % 2.65 % _______________ (1) Represents the aggregate unpaid principal balance for loans we insure.
The Facility remains undrawn as of December 31, 2022. On April 26, 2022, our Board of Directors approved the initiation of a dividend program under which the Company intends to pay a quarterly cash dividend. We paid quarterly dividends of $0.14 per share in May, September and December of 2022.
On April 26, 2022, our Board of Directors approved the initiation of a dividend program under which the Company intends to pay a quarterly cash dividend, subject to approval by our Board of Directors each quarter. We paid quarterly dividends of $0.14 per share in March of 2023 and May, September and December of 2022.
The following tables set forth primary delinquencies, direct case reserves and RIF by aged missed payment status as of the dates indicated: December 31, 2022 (Dollar amounts in millions) Delinquencies Direct case reserves (1) Risk in-force Reserves as % of risk in-force Payments in default: 3 payments or less 8,920 $ 69 $ 509 14 % 4 - 11 payments 6,466 166 390 43 % 12 payments or more 4,557 244 248 98 % Total 19,943 $ 479 $ 1,147 42 % December 31, 2021 (Dollar amounts in millions) Delinquencies Direct case reserves (1) Risk in-force Reserves as % of risk in-force Payments in default: 3 payments or less 6,586 $ 35 $ 340 10 % 4 - 11 payments 7,360 111 426 26 % 12 payments or more 10,874 460 643 72 % Total 24,820 $ 606 $ 1,409 43 % ______________ (1) Direct primary case reserves exclude LAE, pool, IBNR and reinsurance reserves. 98 December 31, 2020 (Dollar amounts in millions) Delinquencies Direct case reserves (1) Risk in-force Reserves as % of risk in-force Payments in default: 3 payments or less 10,484 $ 43 $ 549 8 % 4 - 11 payments 30,324 331 1,853 18 % 12 payments or more 4,096 143 204 70 % Total 44,904 $ 517 $ 2,606 20 % ______________ (1) Direct primary case reserves exclude LAE, pool, IBNR and reinsurance reserves.
The following tables set forth primary delinquencies, direct primary case reserves and RIF by aged missed payment status as of the dates indicated: December 31, 2023 (Dollar amounts in millions) Delinquencies Direct primary case reserves (1) Risk in-force Reserves as % of risk in-force Payments in default: 3 payments or less 10,166 $ 88 $ 629 14 % 4 - 11 payments 6,934 205 469 44 % 12 payments or more 3,332 184 200 92 % Total 20,432 $ 477 $ 1,298 37 % December 31, 2022 (Dollar amounts in millions) Delinquencies Direct primary case reserves (1) Risk in-force Reserves as % of risk in-force Payments in default: 3 payments or less 8,920 $ 69 $ 509 14 % 4 - 11 payments 6,466 166 390 43 % 12 payments or more 4,557 244 248 98 % Total 19,943 $ 479 $ 1,147 42 % ______________ (1) Direct primary case reserves exclude LAE, pool, IBNR and reinsurance reserves. 90 December 31, 2021 (Dollar amounts in millions) Delinquencies Direct primary case reserves (1) Risk in-force Reserves as % of risk in-force Payments in default: 3 payments or less 6,586 $ 35 $ 340 10 % 4 - 11 payments 7,360 111 426 26 % 12 payments or more 10,874 460 643 72 % Total 24,820 $ 606 $ 1,409 43 % ______________ (1) Direct primary case reserves exclude LAE, pool, IBNR and reinsurance reserves.
In support, we have entered into an agreement with Genworth Holdings, Inc. to repurchase its EHI shares on a pro rata basis as part of the program. The share repurchase program is not expected to change Genworth’s ownership interest in EHI post-completion. We began repurchases in the fourth quarter of 2022 which were immaterial.
In conjunction with this authorization, we have entered into an agreement with Genworth Holdings, Inc. to repurchase its EHI shares on a pro rata basis as part of the program. The share repurchase program is not expected to change Genworth’s ownership interest in Enact post-completion.
As of December 31, 2022, the number of unemployed Americans stands at approximately 5.7 million and the number of long term unemployed over 26 weeks was approximately 1.1 million. Both metrics remain relatively in line with February 2020 levels.
The unemployment rate was 3.7% as of December 2023 compared to 3.5% in December 2022. As of December 31, 2023, the number of unemployed Americans stands at approximately 6.3 million and the number of long term unemployed over 26 weeks was approximately 1.2 million. Both metrics remain relatively in line with February 2020 levels. Forbearance and loss mitigation programs.
The following table sets forth primary IIF by DTI score at origination as of the dates indicated: (Amounts in millions) December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 December 31, 2020 45.01% and above $ 43,831 18 % $ 34,076 15 % $ 31,047 15 % 38.01% to 45.00% 87,816 35 79,147 35 73,555 35 38.00% and below 116,615 47 113,291 50 103,345 50 Total $ 248,262 100 % $ 226,514 100 % $ 207,947 100 % The following table sets forth primary RIF by DTI score at origination as of the dates indicated: (Amounts in millions) December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 December 31, 2020 45.01% and above $ 11,176 18 % $ 8,631 15 % $ 7,855 15 % 38.01% to 45.00% 22,268 35 19,974 35 18,647 36 38.00% and below 29,347 47 28,276 50 25,973 49 Total $ 62,791 100 % $ 56,881 100 % $ 52,475 100 % Delinquent loans and claims Our delinquency management process begins with notification by the loan servicer of a delinquency on an insured loan.
The following table sets forth primary IIF by DTI score at origination as of the dates indicated: (Amounts in millions) December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 45.01% and above $ 53,440 20 % $ 43,831 18 % $ 34,076 15 % 38.01% to 45.00% 93,871 36 87,816 35 79,147 35 38.00% and below 115,626 44 116,615 47 113,291 50 Total $ 262,937 100 % $ 248,262 100 % $ 226,514 100 % The following table sets forth primary RIF by DTI score at origination as of the dates indicated: (Amounts in millions) December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 45.01% and above $ 13,830 20 % $ 11,176 18 % $ 8,631 15 % 38.01% to 45.00% 24,072 36 22,268 35 19,974 35 38.00% and below 29,627 44 29,347 47 28,276 50 Total $ 67,529 100 % $ 62,791 100 % $ 56,881 100 % Delinquent loans and claims Our delinquency management process begins with notification by the loan servicer of a delinquency on an insured loan.