These incentives make the development of clean energy projects more competitive by providing tax credits or grants and accelerated depreciation for a portion of the development costs, decreasing the costs and risks associated with developing such projects or creating demand for renewable energy assets through RPS programs.
These incentives make the development of clean energy projects more competitive by providing transferable renewable energy tax credits, grants and accelerated depreciation for a portion of the development costs, decreasing the costs and risks associated with developing such projects or creating demand for renewable energy assets through RPS programs.
In addition, severe weather and natural disasters, such as hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, droughts, extreme temperatures, icing events, wildfires, severe convective storms and earthquakes, can be destructive and cause power outages, personal injury and property damage, reduce revenue, affect the availability of fuel and water and require NEP to incur additional costs to, for example, restore service and repair damaged facilities, obtain replacement power, access available financing sources, obtain insurance, pay for any associated injuries and damages and fund any associated legal matters and compliance penalties.
In addition, severe weather and natural disasters, such as hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, droughts, extreme temperatures, icing events, wildfires, severe convective storms and earthquakes, can be destructive and cause power outages, personal injury and property damage, reduce revenue, affect the availability of fuel and water and require XPLR to incur additional costs to, for example, restore service and repair damaged facilities, obtain replacement power, access available financing sources, obtain insurance, pay for any associated injuries and damages and fund any associated legal matters and compliance penalties.
Transferees of common units are liable both for the obligations of the transferor to make contributions to the partnership that were known to the transferee at the time of transfer and for those obligations that were unknown if the liabilities could have been determined from the partnership agreement.
Transferees of common units are liable both for the obligations of the transferor to make contributions to the partnership that were known to the transferee at the time of transfer and for those obligations that were unknown if the liabilities could have been determined from XPLR's partnership agreement.
Each of the MSA and the management sub-contract, respectively, provides that NEE Management and NEER, respectively, may terminate the applicable agreement upon 180 days’ prior written notice of termination to NEP if NEP defaults in the performance or observance of any material term, condition or covenant contained in the agreement in a manner that results in material harm to NEE Management or its affiliates other than NEP or its subsidiaries, and the default continues unremedied for a period of 90 days after written notice thereof is given to NEP or upon the happening of certain specified events.
Each of the MSA and the management sub-contract, respectively, provides that NEE Management and NEER, respectively, may terminate the applicable agreement upon 180 days’ prior written notice of termination to XPLR if XPLR defaults in the performance or observance of any material term, condition or covenant contained in the agreement in a manner that results in material harm to NEE Management or its affiliates other than XPLR or its subsidiaries, and the default continues unremedied for a period of 90 days after written notice thereof is given to XPLR or upon the happening of certain specified events.
NEP and its subsidiaries have entered into financing agreements which contain various covenants and restrictive provisions and certain financial ratios that may limit their ability to, among other things: • incur or guarantee additional debt; • make distributions on or redeem or repurchase common units; • make certain investments and acquisitions; • incur certain liens or permit them to exist; • enter into certain types of transactions with affiliates; • merge or consolidate with another company; and • transfer, sell or otherwise dispose of projects.
XPLR and its subsidiaries have entered into financing agreements which contain various covenants and restrictive provisions and certain financial ratios that may limit their ability to, among other things: • incur or guarantee additional debt; • make distributions on or redeem or repurchase common units; • make certain investments and acquisitions; • incur certain liens or permit them to exist; • enter into certain types of transactions with affiliates; • merge or consolidate with another company; and • transfer, sell or otherwise dispose of projects.
Risk Factors Limited partnerships and limited partnership interests are inherently different than corporations and shares of capital stock of a corporation, although many of the business risks to which NEP is subject are similar to those that would be faced by a corporation engaged in similar businesses and NEP has elected to be treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Risk Factors Limited partnerships and limited partnership interests are inherently different than corporations and shares of capital stock of a corporation, although many of the business risks to which XPLR is subject are similar to those that would be faced by a corporation engaged in similar businesses and XPLR has elected to be treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
NEP's projects and pipeline investment also carry inherent environmental, health and safety risks, including, without limitation, the potential for related civil litigation, regulatory compliance actions, remediation orders, fines and other penalties. Proceedings related to any such litigation or actions could result in significant expenditures as well as the restriction or elimination of the ability to operate any affected project.
XPLR's projects and pipeline investment also carry inherent environmental, health and safety risks, including, without limitation, the potential for related civil litigation, regulatory compliance actions, remediation orders, fines and other penalties. Proceedings related to any such litigation or actions could result in significant expenditures as well as the restriction or elimination of the ability to operate any affected project.
Additionally, the maximum amount of the aggregate liability of NEE Management or any of its affiliates in providing services under the MSA or otherwise (including, but not limited to, NEER under the management sub-contract), or of any director, officer, employee, contractor, agent, advisor or other representative of NEE Management or any of its affiliates, will be equal to the base management fee previously paid by NEP in the most recent calendar year under the MSA.
Additionally, the maximum amount of the aggregate liability of NEE Management or any of its affiliates in providing services under the MSA or otherwise (including, but not limited to, NEER under the management sub-contract), or of any director, officer, employee, contractor, agent, advisor or other representative of NEE Management or any of its affiliates, will be equal to the base management fee previously paid by XPLR in the most recent calendar year under the MSA.
Since the number of customers that purchase wholesale bulk energy or require the transportation of natural gas is limited, NEP or its pipeline investment may be unable to find a new customer on similar or otherwise acceptable terms or at all. In some cases, there currently is no economical alternative counterparty to the original customer.
Since the number of customers that purchase wholesale bulk energy or require the transportation of natural gas is limited, XPLR or its pipeline investment may be unable to find a new customer on similar or otherwise acceptable terms or at all. In some cases, there currently is no economical alternative counterparty to the original customer.
Such events or actions could significantly decrease or eliminate the revenues of a project or pipeline, significantly increase its operating costs, cause a default under NEP's financing agreements or give rise to damages or penalties payable to a PPA or transportation agreement counterparty, another contractual counterparty, a governmental authority or other third parties or cause defaults under related contracts or permits.
Such events or actions could significantly decrease or eliminate the revenues of a project or pipeline, significantly increase its operating costs, cause a default under XPLR's financing agreements or give rise to damages or penalties payable to a PPA or transportation agreement counterparty, another contractual counterparty, a governmental authority or other third parties or cause defaults under related contracts or permits.
If NEP is not able to extend, renew or replace on acceptable terms existing PPAs before contract expiration, or if such agreements are otherwise terminated prior to their expiration, NEP may be required to sell the energy on an uncontracted basis at prevailing market prices, which could be materially lower than under the applicable contract.
If XPLR is not able to extend, renew or replace on acceptable terms existing PPAs before contract expiration, or if such agreements are otherwise terminated prior to their expiration, XPLR may be required to sell the energy on an uncontracted basis at prevailing market prices, which could be materially lower than under the applicable contract.
If holders of the noncontrolling Class B membership interests, convertible notes or any convertible securities issued in the future, were to dispose of a substantial portion of these common units in the public market following such a conversion or settlement, whether in a single transaction or series of transactions, it could adversely affect the market price for NEP's common units.
If holders of the noncontrolling Class B membership interests, convertible notes or any convertible securities issued in the future, were to dispose of a substantial portion of these common units in the public market following such a conversion or settlement, whether in a single transaction or series of transactions, it could adversely affect the market price for XPLR's common units.
To the extent that resources are not available at planned levels, the financial results from these facilities may be less than expected. NEP depends on certain of the renewable energy projects and the investment in pipeline assets in its portfolio for a substantial portion of its anticipated cash flows.
To the extent that resources are not available at planned levels, the financial results from these facilities may be less than expected. XPLR depends on certain of the renewable energy projects and the investment in pipeline assets in its portfolio for a substantial portion of its anticipated cash flows.
For example, NEP’s partnership agreement provides that: • whenever NEP GP or the board, or any director or any committee of the board (including, but not limited to, the conflicts committee), makes a determination or takes, or declines to take, any other action in its respective capacity, they are required to act in good faith; 21 Table of Contents • NEP GP will not have any liability to NEP or its unitholders for decisions made in its capacity as a general partner so long as such decisions are made in good faith; • NEP GP and its officers and directors and the officers and directors of NEP will not be liable for monetary damages to NEP or NEP's limited partners resulting from any act or omission unless there has been a final and non-appealable judgment entered by a court of competent jurisdiction determining such persons acted in bad faith or engaged in fraud or willful misconduct or, in the case of a criminal matter, acted with knowledge that the conduct was criminal; and • NEP GP and its affiliates and NEP’s directors will not be in breach of their obligations under NEP’s partnership agreement (including, but not limited to, any duties to NEP or its unitholders) if a transaction with an affiliate or the resolution of a conflict of interest is: • approved by the conflicts committee of the board, although the board is not obligated to seek such approval; • approved by the vote of a majority of the outstanding common units, excluding any common units owned by NEP GP and its affiliates if the conflict involves NEP GP or any of its affiliates; • determined by the board to be on terms no less favorable to NEP than those generally being provided to or available from unrelated third parties; or • determined by the board to be fair and reasonable to NEP, taking into account the totality of the relationships among the parties involved, including, but not limited to, other transactions that may be particularly favorable or advantageous to NEP.
For example, XPLR’s partnership agreement provides that: • whenever XPLR GP or the board, or any director or any committee of the board (including, but not limited to, the conflicts committee), makes a determination or takes, or declines to take, any other action in its respective capacity, they are required to act in good faith; • XPLR GP will not have any liability to XPLR or its unitholders for decisions made in its capacity as a general partner so long as such decisions are made in good faith; • XPLR GP and its officers and directors and the officers and directors of XPLR will not be liable for monetary damages to XPLR or XPLR's limited partners resulting from any act or omission unless there has been a final and non-appealable judgment entered by a court of competent jurisdiction determining such persons acted in bad faith or engaged in fraud or willful misconduct or, in the case of a criminal matter, acted with knowledge that the conduct was criminal; and • XPLR GP and its affiliates and XPLR’s directors will not be in breach of their obligations under XPLR’s partnership agreement (including, but not limited to, any duties to XPLR or its unitholders) if a transaction with an affiliate or the resolution of a conflict of interest is: • approved by the conflicts committee of the board, although the board is not obligated to seek such approval; • approved by the vote of a majority of the outstanding common units, excluding any common units owned by XPLR GP and its affiliates if the conflict involves XPLR GP or any of its affiliates; • determined by the board to be on terms no less favorable to XPLR than those generally being provided to or available from unrelated third parties; or • determined by the board to be fair and reasonable to XPLR, taking into account the totality of the relationships among the parties involved, including, but not limited to, other transactions that may be particularly favorable or advantageous to XPLR.
Also, upon the occurrence of certain events, including, but not limited to, NEP's subsidiaries’ inability to satisfy distribution conditions for an extended period of time, NEP's subsidiaries’ revenues may be swept into one or more accounts for the benefit of the lenders under the subsidiaries’ debt agreements and the subsidiaries may be required to prepay indebtedness.
Also, upon the occurrence of certain events, including, but not limited to, XPLR's subsidiaries’ inability to satisfy distribution conditions for an extended period of time, XPLR's subsidiaries’ revenues may be swept into one or more accounts for the benefit of the lenders under the subsidiaries’ debt agreements and the subsidiaries may be required to prepay indebtedness.
For example, if NEP fails to obtain eagle "take" permits under the BGEPA or incidental take permits under the ESA for certain of its wind facilities and eagles or listed species, like cave bats, perish in collisions with facility turbines, NEP or its subsidiaries could face criminal prosecution under these laws.
For example, if XPLR fails to obtain eagle "take" permits under the BGEPA or incidental take permits under the ESA for certain of its wind facilities and eagles or listed species, like cave bats, perish in collisions with facility turbines, XPLR or its subsidiaries could face criminal prosecution under these laws.
Under certain other financing agreements, noncontrolling Class B investors own membership interests in certain NEP subsidiaries and receive a portion of the related NEP subsidiaries’ cash distributions specified in the applicable limited liability company agreements. NEP has the option (buyout right), subject to certain limitations, to purchase 100% of the noncontrolling Class B membership interests during specified periods.
Under certain other financing agreements, noncontrolling Class B investors own membership interests in certain XPLR subsidiaries and receive a portion of the related XPLR subsidiaries’ cash distributions specified in the applicable limited liability company agreements. XPLR has the option (buyout right), subject to certain limitations, to purchase 100% of the noncontrolling Class B membership interests during specified periods.
Under the CSCS agreement, guarantees and letters of credit have been provided by NEECH, NEER and other NEE affiliates to counterparties on behalf of NEP's subsidiaries to satisfy NEP's subsidiaries’ contractual obligations to provide credit support, including, but not limited to, under PPAs. These NEE affiliates also have provided credit support to lenders to fund reserve accounts.
Under the CSCS agreement, guarantees and letters of credit have been provided by NEECH, NEER and other NEE affiliates to counterparties on behalf of XPLR's subsidiaries to satisfy XPLR's subsidiaries’ contractual obligations to provide credit support, including, but not limited to, under PPAs. These NEE affiliates also have provided credit support to lenders to fund reserve accounts.
NEP and/or NEP OpCo may be included in the combined or unitary tax returns of NEE or one or more of its subsidiaries for U.S. state or local income tax purposes. NEP is a party to a tax sharing arrangement which determines the share of taxes that NEP will pay to, or receive from, NEE.
XPLR and/or XPLR OpCo may be included in the combined or unitary tax returns of NEE or one or more of its subsidiaries for U.S. state or local income tax purposes. XPLR is a party to a tax sharing arrangement which determines the share of taxes that XPLR will pay to, or receive from, NEE.
The obligations of NEP OpCo under the ROFR agreement may discourage a third party from pursuing a transaction with NEP OpCo. Even if such third party is able to acquire the applicable asset, NEP OpCo’s compliance with its obligations under the ROFR agreement could result in delays and transaction costs, as well as a reduced sales price.
The obligations of XPLR OpCo under the ROFR agreement may discourage a third party from pursuing a transaction with XPLR OpCo. Even if such third party is able to acquire the applicable asset, XPLR OpCo’s compliance with its obligations under the ROFR agreement could result in delays and transaction costs, as well as a reduced sales price.
A disruption or failure of electric generation, transmission or distribution systems or natural gas production, transmission, storage or distribution systems in the event of a hurricane, tornado or other severe weather event, or otherwise, could prevent NEP from operating its business in the normal course and could result in any of the adverse consequences described above.
A disruption or failure of electric generation, storage, transmission or distribution systems or natural gas production, transmission, storage or distribution systems in the event of a hurricane, tornado or other severe weather event, or otherwise, could prevent XPLR from operating its business in the normal course and could result in any of the adverse consequences described above.
The indebtedness, financing and other agreements of NEP and its subsidiaries, including the agreements under which the noncontrolling Class B investors own membership interests in certain NEP subsidiaries, contain provisions that may trigger acceleration of indebtedness or specified payment obligations of NEP or its subsidiaries upon or in connection with specified transactions, including specified change of control and similar transactions.
The indebtedness, financing and other agreements of XPLR and its subsidiaries, including the agreements under which the noncontrolling Class B investors own membership interests in certain XPLR subsidiaries, contain provisions that may trigger acceleration of indebtedness or specified payment obligations of XPLR or its subsidiaries upon or in connection with specified transactions, including specified change of control and similar transactions.
The natural gas pipeline industry is highly competitive, and increased competitive pressure could adversely affect NEP's pipeline investment. NEP's pipeline investment competes with other energy midstream enterprises, some of which are much larger and have significantly greater financial resources and operating experience in its areas of operation.
The natural gas pipeline industry is highly competitive, and increased competitive pressure could adversely affect XPLR's pipeline investment. XPLR's pipeline investment competes with other energy midstream enterprises, some of which are much larger and have significantly greater financial resources and operating experience in its areas of operation.
If NEP does not exercise the buyout rights during the specified periods because of a lack of access to capital on commercially reasonable terms or otherwise, or if NEP only partially exercises the buyout rights during the specified periods, the portion of the NEP subsidiaries’ cash distribution allocated to the noncontrolling Class B investors would significantly increase.
If XPLR does not exercise the buyout rights during the specified periods because of a lack of access to capital on commercially reasonable terms or otherwise, or if XPLR only partially exercises the buyout rights during the specified periods, the portion of the XPLR subsidiaries’ cash distribution allocated to the noncontrolling Class B investors would significantly increase.
If NEE Management terminates the MSA, if NEER terminates the management sub-contract or if either of them defaults in the performance of its obligations under the respective agreement, NEP may be unable to contract with a substitute service provider on similar terms, and the costs of substituting service providers may be substantial.
If NEE Management terminates the MSA, if NEER terminates the management sub-contract or if either of them defaults in the performance of its obligations under the respective agreement, XPLR may be unable to contract with a substitute service provider on similar terms, and the costs of substituting service providers may be substantial.
NEP has agreed, and will cause certain affiliates to, indemnify NEE Management and its affiliates and any of their directors, officers, agents, members, partners, stockholders and employees and other representatives of NEE Management and its affiliates to the fullest extent permitted by law from and against any claims, liabilities, losses, damages, costs or expenses incurred by an indemnified person or threatened in connection with NEP's, NEP OpCo GP's, NEP OpCo's and certain affiliates' operations, investments and activities or in respect of or arising from the MSA or the services provided thereunder by NEE Management and its affiliates, except to the extent that the claims, liabilities, losses, damages, costs or expenses are determined to have resulted from the conduct in respect of which such persons have liability as described above.
XPLR has agreed, and will cause certain affiliates to, indemnify NEE Management and its affiliates and any of their directors, officers, agents, members, partners, stockholders and employees and other representatives of NEE Management and its affiliates to the fullest extent permitted by law from and against any claims, liabilities, losses, damages, costs or expenses incurred by an indemnified person or threatened in connection with XPLR's, XPLR OpCo GP's, XPLR OpCo's and certain affiliates' operations, investments and activities or in respect of or arising from the MSA or the services provided thereunder by NEE Management and its affiliates, except to the extent that the claims, liabilities, losses, damages, costs or expenses are determined to have resulted from the conduct in respect of which such persons have liability as described above.
In addition, certain provisions in NEP's partnership agreement, including limitations upon the ability of unitholders to make binding proposals of other business to be considered at annual meetings or to request special meetings, may discourage unitholders from attempting to remove the general partner or otherwise change NEP's management.
In addition, certain provisions in XPLR's partnership agreement, including limitations upon the ability of unitholders to make binding proposals of other business to be considered at annual meetings or to request special meetings, may discourage unitholders from attempting to remove the general partner or otherwise change XPLR's management.
The holders of the noncontrolling Class B membership interests generally have certain registration rights that would facilitate such dispositions promptly and NEP cannot guarantee that these holders will not dispose of a substantial portion or all of their common units promptly upon conversion or settlement.
The holders of the noncontrolling Class B membership interests generally have certain registration rights that would facilitate such dispositions promptly and XPLR cannot guarantee that these holders will not dispose of a substantial portion or all of their common units promptly upon conversion or settlement.
Reductions in demand for natural gas in the U.S. and low market prices of natural gas could materially adversely affect NEP's pipeline investment's operations and cash flows. The price of natural gas fluctuates in response to changes in supply and demand, market uncertainty and additional factors that are beyond NEP's control.
Reductions in demand for natural gas in the U.S. and low market prices of natural gas could materially adversely affect XPLR's pipeline investment's operations and cash flows. The price of natural gas fluctuates in response to changes in supply and demand, market uncertainty and additional factors that are beyond XPLR's control.
NEP may retain separate counsel for itself or the holders of common units in the event of a conflict of interest between NEE and its affiliates, on the one hand, and NEP or the holders of common units, on the other, depending on the nature of the conflict. NEP does not intend to do so in most cases.
XPLR may retain separate counsel for itself or the holders of common units in the event of a conflict of interest between NEE and its affiliates, on the one hand, and XPLR or the holders of common units, on the other, depending on the nature of the conflict. XPLR does not intend to do so in most cases.
If exercised, NEP has the right to pay all or a portion of the buyout price in NEP non-voting common units (convertible into NEP common units) or NEP common units, as specified in the related limited liability company agreement, issued at the then-current market price of NEP common units, subject to certain limitations.
If exercised, XPLR has the right to pay all or a portion of the buyout price in XPLR non-voting common units (convertible into XPLR common units) or XPLR common units, as specified in the related limited liability company agreement, issued at the then-current market price of XPLR common units, subject to certain limitations.
A general partner of a limited partnership generally has unlimited liability for the obligations of the limited partnership except for those contractual obligations of the limited partnership that are expressly made without recourse to the general partner. NEP is organized under Delaware law and NEP conducts business in a number of other states.
A general partner of a limited partnership generally has unlimited liability for the obligations of the limited partnership except for those contractual obligations of the limited partnership that are expressly made without recourse to the general partner. XPLR is organized under Delaware law and XPLR conducts business in a number of other states.
For example, • failure to comply with the covenants in the agreements governing these obligations could result in an event of default under those agreements, which could be difficult to cure, result in bankruptcy or, with respect to subsidiary debt, result in loss of NEP OpCo's ownership interest in one or more of its subsidiaries or in some or all of their assets as a result of foreclosure; • NEP's and its subsidiaries’ debt service obligations require them to dedicate a substantial portion of their cash flow to pay principal and interest on their debt, thereby reducing, in the case of NEP's subsidiaries, their cash available for distribution to NEP and, in the case of NEP, its cash available for distribution to its unitholders; • NEP's and its subsidiaries’ substantial indebtedness could limit NEP's ability to fund operations of any projects acquired in the future and NEP's financial flexibility, which could reduce its ability to plan for and react to unexpected opportunities or challenges; • NEP's and its subsidiaries’ substantial debt service obligations make NEP vulnerable to adverse changes in general economic, credit markets, capital markets, industry, competitive conditions and government regulation that could place NEP at a disadvantage compared to competitors with less debt; • NEP's and its subsidiaries’ substantial indebtedness could limit NEP's ability to obtain financing for working capital, including, but not limited to, collateral postings, capital expenditures, debt service requirements and events of default, as well as, acquisitions and general partnership or other purposes; and • NEP's and its subsidiaries' failure to repay or refinance debt at or prior to maturity could limit NEP's ability to obtain financing for working capital.
For example, • failure to comply with the covenants in the agreements governing these obligations could result in an event of default under those agreements, which could be difficult to cure, result in bankruptcy or, with respect to subsidiary debt, result in loss of XPLR OpCo's ownership interest in one or more of its subsidiaries or in some or all of their assets as a result of foreclosure; • XPLR's and its subsidiaries’ debt service obligations require them to dedicate a substantial portion of their cash flow to pay principal and interest on their debt, thereby reducing, in the case of XPLR's subsidiaries, their cash available for distribution to XPLR OpCo and XPLR ; • XPLR's and its subsidiaries’ substantial indebtedness could limit XPLR's ability to fund operations of any projects acquired in the future and XPLR's financial flexibility, which could reduce its ability to plan for and react to unexpected opportunities or challenges; • XPLR's and its subsidiaries’ substantial debt service obligations make XPLR vulnerable to adverse changes in general economic, credit markets, capital markets, industry, competitive conditions and government regulation that could place XPLR at a disadvantage compared to competitors with less debt; • XPLR's and its subsidiaries’ substantial indebtedness could limit XPLR's ability to obtain financing for working capital, including, but not limited to, collateral postings, capital expenditures, debt service requirements and events of default, as well as development opportunities, acquisitions and general partnership or other purposes; and • XPLR's and its subsidiaries' failure to repay or refinance debt at or prior to maturity could limit XPLR's ability to obtain financing for working capital.
Examples of decisions that NEP GP and its affiliates may make in their individual capacities include: • appointment of three directors of NEP; • how to exercise voting rights with respect to the units NEP GP or its affiliates own in NEP OpCo and NEP; • whether to exchange NEP OpCo common units owned by NEE Equity for NEP common units or, with the approval of the conflicts committee, to have NEP OpCo redeem NEP OpCo common units owned by NEE Equity for cash; and • whether to consent to, among other things, NEP’s participation in certain activities or lines of business, the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of NEP, any merger, consolidation or conversion of NEP, dissolution of NEP, or an amendment to NEP OpCo’s partnership agreement.
Examples of decisions that XPLR GP and its affiliates may make in their individual capacities include: • appointment of three directors of XPLR; • how to exercise voting rights with respect to the units XPLR GP or its affiliates own in XPLR OpCo and XPLR; • whether to exchange XPLR OpCo common units owned by NEE Equity for XPLR common units or, with the approval of the conflicts committee, to have XPLR OpCo redeem XPLR OpCo common units owned by NEE Equity for cash; and • whether to consent to, among other things, XPLR’s participation in certain activities or lines of business, the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of XPLR, any merger, consolidation or conversion of XPLR, dissolution of XPLR or an amendment to XPLR OpCo’s partnership agreement.
If an affiliate transaction or the resolution of a conflict of interest is not approved by NEP's unitholders or the conflicts committee and the board determines that the resolution or course of action taken with respect to the affiliate transaction or conflict of interest satisfies either of the standards set forth in the third and fourth sub-bullets above, then it will be presumed that, in making its decision, the board acted in good faith, and in any proceeding brought by or on behalf of any limited partner or NEP challenging such determination, the person bringing or prosecuting such proceeding will have the burden of overcoming such presumption.
If an affiliate transaction or the resolution of a conflict of interest is not approved by XPLR's unitholders or the conflicts committee and the board determines that the resolution or course of action taken with respect to the affiliate transaction or conflict of interest satisfies either of the standards set forth in the third and fourth sub-bullets above, then it will be presumed that, in making its decision, the board acted in good faith, and in any proceeding brought by or on behalf of any limited partner or XPLR challenging such determination, the person bringing or prosecuting such proceeding will have the burden of overcoming such presumption.
If the interconnection or transmission arrangement for a project is terminated, NEP may not be able to replace it on similar terms to the existing arrangement, or at all, or NEP may experience significant delays or costs in connection with such replacement.
If the interconnection or transmission arrangement for a project is terminated, XPLR may not be able to replace it on similar terms to the existing arrangement, or at all, or XPLR may experience significant delays or costs in connection with such replacement.
These events are beyond NEP's control. Lower overall economic output could reduce the volume of natural gas transported or gathered. Transmission revenues could be affected by long-term economic declines which could result in the non-renewal of long-term contracts.
These events are beyond XPLR's control. Lower overall economic output could reduce the volume of natural gas transported or gathered. Transmission revenues could be affected by long-term economic declines which could result in the non-renewal of long-term contracts.
NEP shares insurance coverage with NEE and its affiliates, for which NEP reimburses NEE. NEE currently maintains liability insurance coverage for itself and its affiliates, including NEP, which covers legal and contractual liabilities arising out of bodily injury, personal injury or property damage to third parties.
XPLR shares insurance coverage with NEE and its affiliates, for which XPLR reimburses NEE. NEE currently maintains liability insurance coverage for itself and its affiliates, including XPLR, which covers legal and contractual liabilities arising out of bodily injury, personal injury or property damage to third parties.
The agreements governing NEP's subsidiaries’ project-level debt contain financial tests and covenants that NEP's subsidiaries must satisfy prior to making distributions and restrict the subsidiaries from making more than one distribution per quarter or per six-month period.
The agreements governing XPLR's subsidiaries’ project-level debt contain financial tests and covenants that XPLR's subsidiaries must satisfy prior to making distributions and restrict the subsidiaries from making more than one distribution per quarter or per six-month period.
Any such person or entity will not be liable to NEP or to any limited partner for breach of any fiduciary duty or other duty by reason of the fact that such person or entity pursues or acquires such opportunity for itself, directs such opportunity to another person or entity or does not communicate such opportunity or information to NEP.
Any such person or entity will not be liable to XPLR or to any limited partner for breach of any fiduciary duty or other duty by reason of the fact that such person or entity pursues or acquires such opportunity for itself, directs such opportunity to another person or entity or does not communicate such opportunity or information to XPLR.
The agreement continues until January 1, 2068 and thereafter renews for successive five-year periods unless NEP OpCo or NEE Management provides written notice to the other that it does not wish for the agreement to be renewed.
The agreement continues until January 1, 2068 and thereafter renews for successive five-year periods unless XPLR OpCo or NEE Management provides written notice to the other that it does not wish for the agreement to be renewed.
Additionally, as NEP is a publicly traded limited partnership listed on the NYSE, it is not required to have, and it does not currently have, a majority of independent directors on the board and is not required to establish a compensation committee or a nominating and corporate governance committee.
Additionally, as XPLR is a publicly traded limited partnership listed on the NYSE, it is not required to have, and it does not currently have, a majority of independent directors on the board and is not required to establish a compensation committee or a nominating and corporate governance committee.
These factors could also reduce the useful lives of and degrade equipment, interconnection facilities and transmission facilities, and materially increase maintenance and other costs. Unanticipated costs associated with maintaining or repairing NEP's projects and pipeline investment may reduce profitability.
These factors could also reduce the useful lives of and degrade equipment, interconnection facilities and transmission facilities, and materially increase maintenance and other costs. Unanticipated costs associated with maintaining or repairing XPLR's projects and pipeline investment may reduce profitability.
To the extent geopolitical factors, terrorist acts, cyberattacks or other similar events equate to a force majeure event under NEP's PPAs, the renewable energy counterparty may terminate such PPAs if such a force majeure event continues for a specified period.
To the extent geopolitical factors, terrorist acts, cyberattacks or other similar events equate to a force majeure event under the XPLR's PPAs, the renewable energy counterparty may terminate such PPAs if such a force majeure event continues for a specified period.
NEP also depends upon third-party pipelines and other facilities that transport natural gas to and from its pipeline investment. Because NEP does not own these third-party pipelines or facilities, their continuing operations are not within its control.
XPLR also depends upon third-party pipelines and other facilities that transport natural gas to and from its pipeline investment. Because XPLR does not own these third-party pipelines or facilities, their continuing operations are not within its control.
The ownership interests in the land subject to these easements, leases and rights-of-way may be subject to mortgages securing loans or other liens and other easements, lease rights and rights-of-way of third parties that were created prior to NEP's projects’ easements, leases and rights-of-way.
The ownership interests in the land subject to these easements, leases and rights-of-way may be subject to mortgages securing loans or other liens and other easements, lease rights and rights-of-way of third parties that were created prior to XPLR's projects’ easements, leases and rights-of-way.
Further, the integration and consolidation of acquisitions require substantial human, financial and other resources and, ultimately, NEP's acquisitions may divert NEP's management’s attention from its existing business concerns, disrupt its ongoing business or not be successfully integrated.
Further, the integration and consolidation of acquisitions require substantial human, financial and other resources and, ultimately, XPLR's acquisitions may divert XPLR's management’s attention from its existing business concerns, disrupt its ongoing business or not be successfully integrated.
Any failure of NEP's subsidiaries to maintain acceptable credit support or credit support providers to honor their obligations under their respective credit support arrangements could cause, among other things, events of default to arise under NEP's subsidiaries’ PPAs and financing agreements.
Any failure of XPLR's subsidiaries to maintain acceptable credit support or credit support providers to honor their obligations under their respective credit support arrangements could cause, among other things, events of default to arise under XPLR's subsidiaries’ PPAs and financing agreements.
Because the levels of wind and solar resources are variable and difficult to predict, NEP’s results of operations for individual wind and solar facilities specifically, and NEP's results of operations generally, may vary significantly from period to period, depending on the level of available resources.
Because the levels of wind and solar resources are variable and difficult to predict, XPLR’s results of operations for individual wind and solar facilities specifically, and XPLR's results of operations generally, may vary significantly from period to period, depending on the level of available resources.
NEP does not own all of the land on which the projects in its portfolio are located and they generally are, and its future projects may be, located on land occupied under long-term easements, leases and rights-of-way.
XPLR does not own all of the land on which the projects in its portfolio are located and they generally are, and its future projects may be, located on land occupied under long-term easements, leases and rights-of-way.
Additionally, valuation allowances may be needed for deferred tax assets that NEP estimates are more likely than not to be unusable, based on available evidence at the time the estimate is made.
Additionally, valuation allowances may be needed for deferred tax assets that XPLR estimates are more likely than not to be unusable, based on available evidence at the time the estimate is made.
Accordingly, if NEP makes distributions from current or accumulated earnings and profits as computed for U.S. federal income tax purposes, such distributions will generally be taxable to unitholders as ordinary dividend income for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Accordingly, if XPLR makes distributions from current or accumulated earnings and profits as computed for U.S. federal income tax purposes, such distributions will generally be taxable to unitholders as ordinary dividend income for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
In addition, certain agreements and guarantee arrangements would require posting of additional collateral in the event of a ratings downgrade. Some of the factors that can affect credit ratings are cash flows, liquidity, the amount of debt as a component of total capitalization, the rating agencies' treatment of certain financing arrangements and other instruments convertible into equity.
In addition, certain agreements and guarantee arrangements would require posting of additional collateral in the event of a ratings downgrade. Some of the factors that can affect credit ratings are cash flows, liquidity, the amount of debt as a component of total capitalization, the rating agencies' treatment of certain financing arrangements and other instruments convertible into or settleable with equity.
Wind turbine or solar panel placement, interference from nearby wind projects or other structures and the effects of vegetation, snow, ice, land use and terrain also affect the amount of energy that NEP's wind and solar projects generate.
Wind turbine or solar panel placement, interference from nearby wind projects or other structures and the effects of vegetation, snow, ice, land use and terrain also affect the amount of energy that XPLR's wind and solar projects generate.
To the extent NEE or any of its affiliates experience covered losses under the insurance policies, the limit of NEP's coverage for potential losses may be decreased. NEE may also reduce or eliminate such coverage at any time.
To the extent NEE or any of its affiliates experience covered losses under the insurance policies, the limit of XPLR's coverage for potential losses may be decreased. NEE may also reduce or eliminate such coverage at any time.
Because these provisions may materially increase the capital NEP may need to expend to complete such a transaction, these provisions may preclude NEP from pursuing or consummating such transactions and limit the types of transactions NEP is able to consummate.
Because these provisions may materially increase the capital XPLR may need to expend to complete such a transaction, these provisions may limit or preclude XPLR from pursuing or consummating such transactions and limit the types of transactions XPLR is able to consummate.
NEER and certain of its affiliates are permitted to borrow funds received by NEP OpCo or its subsidiaries and is obligated to return these funds only as needed to cover project costs and distributions or as demanded by NEP OpCo.
NEER and certain of its affiliates are permitted to borrow funds received by XPLR OpCo or its subsidiaries and is obligated to return these funds only as needed to cover project costs and distributions or as demanded by XPLR OpCo.
Any such person or entity that becomes aware of a potential transaction, agreement, arrangement or other matter that may be an opportunity for NEP will not have any duty to communicate or offer such opportunity to NEP.
Any such person or entity that becomes aware of a potential transaction, agreement, arrangement or other matter that may be an opportunity for XPLR will not have any duty to communicate or offer such opportunity to XPLR.
A unitholder could be liable for any and all of NEP's obligations as if the unitholder were a general partner if a court or government agency were to determine that: • NEP was conducting business in a state but had not complied with that particular state’s limited partnership statute; or • the unitholder’s right to act with other unitholders to remove or replace NEP GP, to approve some amendments to NEP's partnership agreement or to take other actions under NEP's partnership agreement constitute “control” of NEP's business.
A unitholder could be liable for any and all of XPLR's obligations as if the unitholder were a general partner if a court or government agency were to determine that: • XPLR was conducting business in a state but had not complied with that particular state’s limited partnership statute; or • the unitholder’s right to act with other unitholders to remove or replace XPLR GP, to approve some amendments to XPLR's partnership agreement or to take other actions under XPLR's partnership agreement constitute “control” of XPLR's business.
NEP's ability to use its NOLs to offset future taxable income could be substantially limited if NEP’s unitholders that own 5% or more of NEP’s outstanding common units, as defined under Code Section 382, increase their ownership in NEP by more than 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period through, among other things, additional purchases of NEP's common units and certain types of reorganization transactions.
XPLR's ability to use its NOLs to offset future taxable income could be substantially limited if XPLR’s unitholders that own 5% or more of XPLR’s outstanding common units, as defined under Code Section 382, increase their ownership in XPLR by more than 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period through, among other things, additional purchases of XPLR's common units and certain types of reorganization transactions.
Additionally, NEP risks overpaying for such projects or not making acquisitions on an accretive basis. Although NEP performs due diligence on prospective acquisitions, NEP may not discover all potential risks, operational issues or other issues in such projects.
Additionally, XPLR risks overpaying for such projects or not making acquisitions on an accretive basis. Although XPLR performs due diligence on prospective acquisitions, XPLR may not discover all potential risks, operational issues or other issues in such projects.
NEER and certain of its affiliates are permitted to withdraw funds received by NEP OpCo under the CSCS agreement, or NEP OpCo's subsidiaries in connection with certain long-term debt agreements, and hold them in an account of NEER or its affiliates to the extent the funds are not required to pay project costs or otherwise required to be retained by NEP's subsidiaries, until the financing agreements permit distributions to be made, or, in the case of NEP OpCo, until such funds are required to make distributions or to pay expenses or other operating costs or NEP OpCo otherwise demands the return of such funds.
NEER and certain of its affiliates are permitted to withdraw funds received by XPLR OpCo under the CSCS agreement, or XPLR OpCo's subsidiaries in connection with certain long-term debt agreements, and hold them in an account of NEER or its affiliates to the extent the funds are not required to pay project costs or otherwise required to be retained by XPLR's subsidiaries, until the financing agreements permit distributions to be made, or, in the case of XPLR OpCo, until such funds are required to make distributions or to pay expenses or other operating costs or XPLR OpCo otherwise demands the return of such funds.
The vote of the holders of at least 66 2⁄3% of all outstanding common units and special voting units voting together as a single class is required to remove NEP's general partner.
The vote of the holders of at least 66 2⁄3% of all outstanding common units and special voting units voting together as a single class is required to remove XPLR's general partner.
Further, the vote of the holders of at least a majority of all outstanding common units and special voting units voting together as a single class is required to name a new general partner of NEP.
Further, the vote of the holders of at least a majority of all outstanding common units and special voting units voting together as a single class is required to name a new general partner of XPLR.
Further, the IRS or other tax authorities could challenge one or more tax positions NEP or NEP OpCo takes, such as the classification of assets under the income tax depreciation rules, the characterization of expenses (including, but not limited to, fees paid to NEE) for income tax purposes, the extent to which sales, use or goods and services tax applies to operations in a particular state or the availability of property tax exemptions with respect to NEP's projects.
Further, the IRS or other tax authorities could challenge one or more tax positions XPLR or XPLR OpCo takes, such as the classification of assets under the income tax depreciation rules, the characterization of expenses (including, but not limited to, fees paid to NEE) for income tax purposes, the extent to which sales, use or goods and services tax applies to operations in a particular state or the availability of property tax exemptions with respect to XPLR's projects.
In addition, although return-of-capital distributions are generally non-taxable to the extent of a unitholder’s basis in its units, such distributions will reduce the unitholder’s adjusted tax basis in its units, which will result in an increase in the amount of gain (or a decrease in the amount of loss) that will be recognized by the unitholder on a future disposition of NEP's common units, and to the extent any return-of-capital distribution exceeds a unitholder’s basis, such distributions will be treated as gain on the sale or exchange of the units. 24 Table of Contents Item 1B.
In addition, although return-of-capital distributions are generally non-taxable to the extent of a unitholder’s basis in its units, such distributions will reduce the unitholder’s adjusted tax basis in its units, which will result in an increase in the amount of gain (or a decrease in the amount of loss) that will be recognized by the unitholder on a future disposition of XPLR's common units, and to the extent any return-of-capital distribution exceeds a unitholder’s basis, such distributions will be treated as gain on the sale or exchange of the units. 26 Table of Contents Item 1B.
For renewable energy projects or pipelines located near populated areas, including, but not limited to, residential areas, commercial business centers, industrial sites and other public gathering areas, or areas more prone to wildfires, the level of damage resulting from certain of these risks could be greater.
For renewable energy projects, battery storage projects, other facilities or pipelines located near populated areas, including, but not limited to, residential areas, commercial business centers, industrial sites and other public gathering areas, or areas more prone to wildfires, the level of damage resulting from certain of these risks could be greater.
Affiliates of NEP GP, including, but not limited to, NEE and its other subsidiaries, are not prohibited from owning projects or engaging in businesses that compete directly or indirectly with NEP. NEE currently holds interests in, and may make investments in and purchases of, entities that acquire, own and operate clean energy projects.
Affiliates of XPLR GP, including, but not limited to, NEE and its other subsidiaries, are not prohibited from owning projects or engaging in businesses that compete directly or indirectly with XPLR. NEE currently holds interests in, and may make investments in and purchases of, entities that develop, acquire, own and operate clean energy projects.
Any failure by NEE Management or NEER to perform their administrative, O&M and construction management services obligations or the failure by NEP to identify and contract with replacement service providers, if required, could materially impact the successful operation of its projects. Under these agreements, certain NEE employees provide services to NEP.
Any failure by NEE Management or NEER to perform their administrative, O&M and development and construction management services obligations or the failure by XPLR to identify and contract with replacement service providers, if required, could materially impact the successful operation of its projects. Under these agreements, certain NEE employees provide services to XPLR.
NEP may not be able to maintain or obtain insurance of the type and amount NEP desires at reasonable rates and NEP may elect to self-insure some of its wind and solar projects.
XPLR may not be able to maintain or obtain insurance of the type and amount XPLR desires at reasonable rates and XPLR may elect to self-insure some of its wind and solar projects.
While NEP performs title searches, obtains title insurance, records its interests in the real property records of the projects’ localities and enters into non-disturbance agreements to protect itself against these risks, such measures may be inadequate to protect against all risk that NEP's rights to use the land on which its projects are or will be located and its projects’ rights to such easements, leases and rights-of-way could be lost or curtailed.
While XPLR performs title searches, obtains title insurance, records its interests in the real property records of the projects’ localities and enters into non-disturbance agreements to protect itself against these risks, such measures may be inadequate to protect against all risk that XPLR's rights to use the land on which its projects are or will be located and its projects’ rights to such easements, leases and rights-of-way could be lost or curtailed.
Any violation of such an order could result in the loss or curtailment of NEP's rights to use any federal land on which its projects are or will be located.
Any violation of such an order could result in the loss or curtailment of XPLR's rights to use any federal land on which its projects are or will be located.
However, if such person is NEP's general partner or any of its affiliates, the 9.99% limitation on voting power applies only to the election or removal of certain directors.
However, if such person is XPLR's general partner or any of its affiliates, the 9.99% limitation on voting power applies only to the election or removal of certain directors.
In connection with a situation involving a transaction with an affiliate or a conflict of interest, any determination by NEP GP or the board, or the conflicts committee of the board, must be made in good faith.
In connection with a situation involving a transaction with an affiliate or a conflict of interest, any determination by XPLR GP or the board, or the conflicts committee of the board, must be made in good faith.
If certain agreements with NEE Management or NEER are terminated, NEP may be unable to contract with a substitute service provider on similar terms. NEE's affiliates provide, or arrange for the provision of, administrative, O&M and construction management services under agreements with NEE Management and NEER, respectively.
If certain agreements with NEE Management or NEER are terminated, XPLR may be unable to contract with a substitute service provider on similar terms. NEE's affiliates provide, or arrange for the provision of, administrative, O&M and development and construction management services under agreements with NEE Management and NEER, respectively.
NEP and NEP OpCo have entered into a ROFR agreement with NEER granting NEER and its subsidiaries (other than NEP OpCo and its subsidiaries) a right of first refusal on any proposed sale of any of the NEP OpCo ROFR assets.
XPLR and XPLR OpCo have entered into a ROFR agreement with NEER granting NEER and its subsidiaries (other than XPLR OpCo and its subsidiaries) a right of first refusal on any proposed sale of any of the XPLR OpCo ROFR assets.
Because of these factors, NEP OpCo may not have sufficient available cash each quarter to pay a quarterly distribution per common unit or any other amount.
Because of these factors, XPLR OpCo may not have sufficient available cash each quarter to pay a quarterly distribution per common unit or any other amount.
In addition, if beneficiaries draw on credit support provided by NEECH, NEER and these other NEE affiliates, then NEP OpCo may be required to reimburse them for the amounts drawn, which could reduce NEP OpCo’s cash distributions. These events could decrease NEP's revenues, restrict distributions from its subsidiaries, or result in a sale of or foreclosure on its assets.
In addition, if beneficiaries draw on credit support provided by NEECH, NEER and these other NEE affiliates, then XPLR OpCo may be required to reimburse them for the amounts drawn, which could reduce XPLR OpCo’s cash distributions. These events could decrease XPLR's revenues, restrict distributions from its subsidiaries, or result in a sale of or foreclosure on its assets.
For example, NEP’s partnership agreement permits the board to make some decisions in its sole discretion, free of any duties to NEP or its unitholders other than the implied contractual covenant of good faith and fair dealing (which means that a court will enforce the reasonable expectations of the partners where the language of the partnership agreement does not provide for a clear course of action).
For example, XPLR’s partnership agreement permits the board to make some decisions in its sole discretion, free of any duties to XPLR or its unitholders other than the implied contractual covenant of good faith and fair dealing (which means that a court will enforce the reasonable expectations of the partners where the language of the XPLR partnership agreement does not provide for a clear course of action).
Such events of default could entitle customers to terminate their contracts with NEP's subsidiaries or could entitle lenders to accelerate indebtedness owed to them, which could result in the insolvency of NEP's subsidiaries.
Such events of default could entitle customers to terminate their contracts with XPLR's subsidiaries or could entitle lenders to accelerate indebtedness owed to them, which could result in the insolvency of XPLR's subsidiaries.