vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agilent Technologies (A) and EnerSys (ENS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Agilent Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $919.1M, roughly 2.0× EnerSys). Agilent Technologies runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 9.8%, a 7.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Agilent Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs 1.4%). Agilent Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($175.0M vs $171.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Agilent Technologies's revenue compounded faster (6.9% CAGR vs 0.5%).
Agilent Technologies, Inc. provides application focused solutions to the life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets worldwide. The Life Sciences and Applied Markets segment offers liquid chromatography systems and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry systems; gas chromatography systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instruments; atomic absorption instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emissi...
EnerSys is a stored energy systems and technology provider for industrial applications. The company manufactures reserve-power and motive-power batteries, battery chargers, power equipment, battery accessories and outdoor equipment enclosures.
A vs ENS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $919.1M |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $90.4M |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | 30.1% |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | 13.5% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 9.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.1% | -21.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $2.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $919.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $951.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $893.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $974.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $906.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $883.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $852.9M |
| Q1 26 | $305.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $434.0M | $90.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $68.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $57.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $96.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.0M | $114.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $82.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $70.1M |
| Q1 26 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.2% | 30.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.1% | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | 28.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | 31.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.2% | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.4% | 27.9% |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | 10.7% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 8.2% |
| Q1 26 | $1.07 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | $2.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $1.80 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $1.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | $2.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $2.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $2.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $1.71 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $450.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.0B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $12.8B | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $450.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $388.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $346.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $343.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $463.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $407.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $344.1M |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9B | $3.6B |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $268.0M | $184.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | $171.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | 18.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | 2.04× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $993.0M | $441.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $268.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $545.0M | $184.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $218.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $968.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $135.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.0M | $81.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $33.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.0M | $10.4M |
| Q1 26 | $175.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.0M | $171.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $197.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $-32.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | $104.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.0M | $56.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.0M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $-25.7M |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | -3.0% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | 2.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 3.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | 0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | 0.71× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | 0.15× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
A
| Service Other | $525.0M | 29% |
| Chemicaland Energy Market | $422.0M | 23% |
| Agilent Cross Lab | $273.0M | 15% |
| Environmentaland Forensics Market | $177.0M | 10% |
| Food Market | $166.0M | 9% |
| Academiaand Government Market | $130.0M | 7% |
| Applied Markets | $98.0M | 5% |
ENS
| Energy Systems | $399.5M | 43% |
| Motive Power | $352.0M | 38% |
| Services | $92.6M | 10% |
| Transferred Over Time | $38.2M | 4% |
| Other | $36.8M | 4% |
