vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and EnerSys (ENS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Albemarle Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $919.1M, roughly 1.6× EnerSys). EnerSys runs the higher net margin — 9.8% vs -29.0%, a 38.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Albemarle Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs 1.4%). Albemarle Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.1M vs $171.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Albemarle Corporation's revenue compounded faster (2.4% CAGR vs 0.5%).
Albemarle Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets engineered specialty chemicals worldwide. It operates through three segments: Lithium, Bromine, and Catalysts. The Lithium segment offers lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and lithium specialties; and reagents, such as butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride for use in lithium batteries for consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers...
EnerSys is a stored energy systems and technology provider for industrial applications. The company manufactures reserve-power and motive-power batteries, battery chargers, power equipment, battery accessories and outdoor equipment enclosures.
ALB vs ENS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $919.1M |
| Net Profit | $-414.2M | $90.4M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 30.1% |
| Operating Margin | -15.2% | 13.5% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | 9.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -650.1% | -21.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.88 | $2.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $919.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $951.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $893.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $974.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $906.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $883.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $852.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $910.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-414.2M | $90.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-160.7M | $68.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $57.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.3M | $96.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $114.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1B | $82.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-188.2M | $70.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $60.9M |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 30.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 28.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 31.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.7% | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 27.9% |
| Q4 25 | -15.2% | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -81.9% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.4% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | 8.9% |
| Q4 25 | -29.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -78.9% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.2% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 6.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.88 | $2.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.72 | $1.80 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $1.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $2.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $2.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.45 | $2.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.96 | $1.71 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $1.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $450.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5B | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $16.4B | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $450.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $388.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $346.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $343.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $463.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $407.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $344.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $333.3M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $802.0M |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $3.5B |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | 0.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $388.5M | $184.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.1M | $171.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.3% | 18.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.04× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $692.5M | $441.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.5M | $184.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.6M | $218.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $968.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.4M | $135.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $674.0K | $81.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.5M | $33.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.9M | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $233.1M | $171.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.4M | $197.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-126.8M | $-32.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.8M | $104.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-355.1M | $56.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.6M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.7M | $-25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-481.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.5% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.3% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.31× | 0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.19× | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 0.71× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.01× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALB
| Energy Storage | $759.1M | 53% |
| Specialties | $348.9M | 24% |
| Ketjen | $320.1M | 22% |
ENS
| Energy Systems | $399.5M | 43% |
| Motive Power | $352.0M | 38% |
| Services | $92.6M | 10% |
| Transferred Over Time | $38.2M | 4% |
| Other | $36.8M | 4% |
