vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agilent Technologies (A) and Fidelity National Information Services (FIS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fidelity National Information Services is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8B vs $1.8B, roughly 1.6× Agilent Technologies). Fidelity National Information Services runs the higher net margin — 18.2% vs 17.0%, a 1.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fidelity National Information Services posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.1% vs 7.0%). Fidelity National Information Services produced more free cash flow last quarter ($739.0M vs $175.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Agilent Technologies's revenue compounded faster (6.9% CAGR vs 6.8%).
Agilent Technologies, Inc. provides application focused solutions to the life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets worldwide. The Life Sciences and Applied Markets segment offers liquid chromatography systems and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry systems; gas chromatography systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instruments; atomic absorption instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emissi...
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is an American multinational corporation which offers a wide range of financial products and services. FIS is most known for its development of Financial Technology, or FinTech. Annually, FIS facilitates the movement of roughly US$9 trillion through the processing of approximately 75 billion transactions in service to more than 20,000 clients around the globe.
A vs FIS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $2.8B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $511.0M |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | 18.8% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 18.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.1% | 97.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $0.98 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $2.5B |
| Q1 26 | $305.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $434.0M | $511.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $264.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $-470.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $77.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.0M | $259.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $224.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $243.0M |
| Q1 26 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.2% | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.1% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | 36.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | 34.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | 36.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.2% | 38.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.4% | 38.2% |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 18.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | 15.2% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | -18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 9.8% |
| Q1 26 | $1.07 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | $0.98 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $0.50 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $0.51 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $599.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.0B | $9.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | $13.9B |
| Total Assets | $12.8B | $33.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | 0.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $599.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $571.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $581.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $805.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $8.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $8.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $10.6B |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $13.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $13.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $14.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $15.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $15.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $16.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $17.0B |
| Q1 26 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7B | $33.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $33.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $33.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | $32.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $33.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $34.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9B | $34.6B |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | 0.63× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | 0.62× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $268.0M | $758.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | $739.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | 26.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | 0.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | 1.48× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $993.0M | $2.5B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $268.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $545.0M | $758.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $382.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $457.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.0M | $782.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $641.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.0M | $546.0M |
| Q1 26 | $175.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.0M | $739.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $952.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $343.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | $420.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.0M | $764.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.0M | $605.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $530.0M |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 35.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | 29.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 21.3% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 3.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | 5.94× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | 3.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 2.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | 2.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
A
| Service Other | $525.0M | 29% |
| Chemicaland Energy Market | $422.0M | 23% |
| Agilent Cross Lab | $273.0M | 15% |
| Environmentaland Forensics Market | $177.0M | 10% |
| Food Market | $166.0M | 9% |
| Academiaand Government Market | $130.0M | 7% |
| Applied Markets | $98.0M | 5% |
FIS
| Banking Solutions | $1.6B | 57% |
| Other | $701.0M | 25% |
| Capital Market Solutions | $508.0M | 18% |
