vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agilent Technologies (A) and Fabrinet (FN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Agilent Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.6× Fabrinet). Agilent Technologies runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 9.9%, a 7.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fabrinet posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.9% vs 7.0%). Agilent Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($175.0M vs $-5.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Fabrinet's revenue compounded faster (24.4% CAGR vs 6.9%).
Agilent Technologies, Inc. provides application focused solutions to the life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets worldwide. The Life Sciences and Applied Markets segment offers liquid chromatography systems and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry systems; gas chromatography systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instruments; atomic absorption instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emissi...
FabrinetFNEarnings & Financial Report
Below is a list of companies having stocks that are included in the S&P MidCap 400 stock market index. The index, maintained by S&P Dow Jones Indices, comprises the common stocks of 400 mid-cap, mostly American, companies. Although called the S&P 400, the index sometimes contains more than 400 stocks when it includes two or more share classes of stock from one of its component companies.
A vs FN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $112.6M |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | 12.2% |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 9.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 35.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.1% | 30.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $3.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $978.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $909.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $871.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $833.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $804.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $753.3M |
| Q1 26 | $305.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $434.0M | $112.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $95.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $87.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $81.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.0M | $86.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $77.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $81.1M |
| Q1 26 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.2% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.1% | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.2% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.4% | 12.3% |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 10.8% |
| Q1 26 | $1.07 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | $3.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $2.66 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $2.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | $2.25 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $2.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $2.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $2.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $960.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.0B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $12.8B | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $960.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $968.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $934.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $950.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $934.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $908.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $858.6M |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9B | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $268.0M | $46.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | $-5.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | -0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | 0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $993.0M | $102.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $268.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $545.0M | $46.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $102.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $55.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $74.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.0M | $115.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $83.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.0M | $83.1M |
| Q1 26 | $175.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.0M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | $45.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.0M | $94.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.0M | $62.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $70.4M |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 9.3% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | 0.41× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | 0.91× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 1.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | 1.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
A
| Service Other | $525.0M | 29% |
| Chemicaland Energy Market | $422.0M | 23% |
| Agilent Cross Lab | $273.0M | 15% |
| Environmentaland Forensics Market | $177.0M | 10% |
| Food Market | $166.0M | 9% |
| Academiaand Government Market | $130.0M | 7% |
| Applied Markets | $98.0M | 5% |
FN
| Optical Communications | $832.6M | 73% |
| Non Optical Communications | $300.3M | 27% |
