vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agilent Technologies (A) and CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Agilent Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.7× CHART INDUSTRIES INC). Agilent Technologies runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 5.0%, a 12.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Agilent Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs -2.5%). Agilent Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($175.0M vs $66.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Agilent Technologies's revenue compounded faster (6.9% CAGR vs 6.6%).
Agilent Technologies, Inc. provides application focused solutions to the life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets worldwide. The Life Sciences and Applied Markets segment offers liquid chromatography systems and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry systems; gas chromatography systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instruments; atomic absorption instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emissi...
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
A vs GTLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $53.6M |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | 11.6% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.1% | -32.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $1.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $305.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $434.0M | $53.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $-138.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $76.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.0M | $79.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $69.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $58.6M |
| Q1 26 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.2% | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.1% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | 33.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.2% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.4% | 33.8% |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | 16.1% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | -12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | $1.07 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $-3.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $1.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $1.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $1.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $366.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.0B | $3.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $12.8B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | 1.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $366.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $399.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $342.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $296.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $308.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $310.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $247.4M |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9B | $9.3B |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | 1.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $268.0M | $88.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | $66.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | 6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | 1.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $993.0M | $202.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $268.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $545.0M | $88.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $118.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $145.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.0M | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $200.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.0M | $116.1M |
| Q1 26 | $175.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.0M | $66.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $122.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | $-80.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.0M | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.0M | $174.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $88.0M |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 8.5% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | -1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 2.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | 1.98× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
A
| Service Other | $525.0M | 29% |
| Chemicaland Energy Market | $422.0M | 23% |
| Agilent Cross Lab | $273.0M | 15% |
| Environmentaland Forensics Market | $177.0M | 10% |
| Food Market | $166.0M | 9% |
| Academiaand Government Market | $130.0M | 7% |
| Applied Markets | $98.0M | 5% |
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
