vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agilent Technologies (A) and OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Agilent Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.6× OneMain Holdings, Inc.). OneMain Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 18.7% vs 17.0%, a 1.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OneMain Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.3% vs 7.0%). Over the past eight quarters, OneMain Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (10.4% CAGR vs 6.9%).
Agilent Technologies, Inc. provides application focused solutions to the life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets worldwide. The Life Sciences and Applied Markets segment offers liquid chromatography systems and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry systems; gas chromatography systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instruments; atomic absorption instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emissi...
OneMain Holdings, Inc.OMFEarnings & Financial Report
OneMain Holdings, Inc. is an American financial services holding company headquartered in Evansville, Indiana, with central offices throughout the United States. The company wholly owns OneMain Finance Corporation and its subsidiaries, through which it operates in the consumer finance and insurance industries as OneMain Financial. Its business primarily focuses on providing personal loans and optional insurance products to customers with limited access to traditional lenders, such as banks an...
A vs OMF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $204.0M |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | 22.8% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 18.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 8.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.1% | 61.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $1.71 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $996.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $981.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $922.0M |
| Q1 26 | $305.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $434.0M | $204.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $199.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $167.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $213.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.0M | $126.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $157.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $71.0M |
| Q1 26 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | 22.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | 27.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 21.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | 10.0% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 18.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | 21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 16.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 7.7% |
| Q1 26 | $1.07 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | $1.71 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $1.67 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $1.40 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | $1.78 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $1.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $1.31 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $914.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.0B | $22.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | $3.4B |
| Total Assets | $12.8B | $27.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | 6.67× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $914.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $658.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $769.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $627.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $458.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $577.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $667.0M |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $22.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $22.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $22.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $21.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $21.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $21.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $20.7B |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7B | $27.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $27.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $26.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | $26.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $25.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $25.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9B | $25.1B |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | 6.67× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | 6.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | 6.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | 6.55× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | 6.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | 6.59× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | 6.56× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $268.0M | $865.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | 4.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $993.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $268.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $545.0M | $865.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $828.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $774.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $665.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.0M | $752.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $677.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.0M | $712.0M |
| Q1 26 | $175.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | 4.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 4.16× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | 4.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | 3.12× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | 5.97× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 4.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | 10.03× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
A
| Service Other | $525.0M | 29% |
| Chemicaland Energy Market | $422.0M | 23% |
| Agilent Cross Lab | $273.0M | 15% |
| Environmentaland Forensics Market | $177.0M | 10% |
| Food Market | $166.0M | 9% |
| Academiaand Government Market | $130.0M | 7% |
| Applied Markets | $98.0M | 5% |
OMF
Segment breakdown not available.
