vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agilent Technologies (A) and Public Service Enterprise Group (PEG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Public Service Enterprise Group is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9B vs $1.8B, roughly 1.6× Agilent Technologies). Agilent Technologies runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 10.8%, a 6.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Public Service Enterprise Group posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.3% vs 7.0%). Agilent Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($175.0M vs $-408.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Agilent Technologies's revenue compounded faster (6.9% CAGR vs 2.8%).
Agilent Technologies, Inc. provides application focused solutions to the life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets worldwide. The Life Sciences and Applied Markets segment offers liquid chromatography systems and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry systems; gas chromatography systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instruments; atomic absorption instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emissi...
The Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc. (PSEG) is a publicly traded energy company based in Newark, New Jersey, where it has been based since its founding. It was founded in 1985, with its roots tracing back to 1903.
A vs PEG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $2.9B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $315.0M |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | 17.5% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 18.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.1% | 10.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $0.63 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | $305.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $434.0M | $315.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $622.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $585.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $589.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.0M | $286.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $520.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $434.0M |
| Q1 26 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 29.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | 24.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 18.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | 24.0% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 17.9% |
| Q1 26 | $1.07 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | $0.63 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $1.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $1.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | $1.18 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $1.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $0.87 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $132.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.0B | $22.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | $17.0B |
| Total Assets | $12.8B | $57.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | 1.33× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $132.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $334.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $186.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $894.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $125.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $203.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $113.0M |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $22.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $22.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $22.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $23.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $21.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $21.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $20.5B |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $17.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $17.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $16.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $16.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $16.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $16.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $15.8B |
| Q1 26 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7B | $57.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $56.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $56.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | $55.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $54.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $54.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9B | $52.4B |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | 1.36× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | 1.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | 1.30× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $268.0M | $721.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | $-408.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | -14.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | 38.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | 2.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $993.0M | $26.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $268.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $545.0M | $721.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $478.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.0M | $367.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $623.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.0M | $482.0M |
| Q1 26 | $175.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.0M | $-408.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $322.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $-309.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | $421.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.0M | $-611.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.0M | $-145.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $-355.0M |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | -14.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | -11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 13.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | -24.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | -14.7% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 38.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 22.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 28.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 19.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 39.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 34.5% |
| Q1 26 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | 2.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 1.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | 0.82× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | 1.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | 1.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 1.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | 1.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
A
| Service Other | $525.0M | 29% |
| Chemicaland Energy Market | $422.0M | 23% |
| Agilent Cross Lab | $273.0M | 15% |
| Environmentaland Forensics Market | $177.0M | 10% |
| Food Market | $166.0M | 9% |
| Academiaand Government Market | $130.0M | 7% |
| Applied Markets | $98.0M | 5% |
PEG
| PSEG Power Other | $1.1B | 37% |
| Electric Distribution Contracts | $929.0M | 32% |
| Gas Distribution Contracts | $840.0M | 29% |
| Other | $71.0M | 2% |
