vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agilent Technologies (A) and RYDER SYSTEM INC (R). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RYDER SYSTEM INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.1B vs $1.8B, roughly 1.7× Agilent Technologies). Agilent Technologies runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 3.0%, a 14.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Agilent Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs 1.0%). RYDER SYSTEM INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($273.0M vs $175.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Agilent Technologies's revenue compounded faster (6.9% CAGR vs -0.9%).
Agilent Technologies, Inc. provides application focused solutions to the life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets worldwide. The Life Sciences and Applied Markets segment offers liquid chromatography systems and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry systems; gas chromatography systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instruments; atomic absorption instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emissi...
Ryder System, Inc. is an American transportation and logistics company, specializing in truck rental and leasing, fleet management, supply chain management, and transportation management. It also offers full-service leasing, rental and maintenance, used vehicle sales, transportation management, professional drivers, e-commerce fulfillment, and last-mile delivery services. The company is headquartered in Coral Gables, Florida, and operates in the United States and United Kingdom.
A vs R — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $3.1B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $93.0M |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 3.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 1.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.1% | -5.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $2.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | $305.0M | $93.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $434.0M | $132.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $138.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $131.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $98.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.0M | $135.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $142.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $127.0M |
| Q1 26 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 4.0% |
| Q1 26 | $1.07 | $2.34 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | $3.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $3.32 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $3.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | $2.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $3.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $3.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $2.84 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $182.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.0B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $12.8B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | $182.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $198.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $189.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $180.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $151.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $154.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $162.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $164.0M |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $7.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $6.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $6.5B |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $3.1B |
| Q1 26 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7B | $16.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $16.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $16.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | $16.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $16.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $16.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9B | $16.4B |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | 2.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | 2.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | 2.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | 2.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | 2.09× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $268.0M | $583.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | $273.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | 8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | 13.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | 6.27× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $993.0M | $595.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $268.0M | $583.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $545.0M | $749.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $442.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $752.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $651.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.0M | $558.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $629.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.0M | $552.0M |
| Q1 26 | $175.0M | $273.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.0M | $344.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $-85.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $63.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | $137.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.0M | $-201.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.0M | $30.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $-87.0M |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | -6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | -2.7% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 12.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 21.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 23.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | 0.88× | 6.27× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | 5.67× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 3.20× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | 5.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | 6.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | 4.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 4.43× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | 4.35× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
A
| Service Other | $525.0M | 29% |
| Chemicaland Energy Market | $422.0M | 23% |
| Agilent Cross Lab | $273.0M | 15% |
| Environmentaland Forensics Market | $177.0M | 10% |
| Food Market | $166.0M | 9% |
| Academiaand Government Market | $130.0M | 7% |
| Applied Markets | $98.0M | 5% |
R
| Fleet Management Solutions | $1.5B | 47% |
| ChoiceLease | $878.0M | 28% |
| Dedicated Transportation Solutions | $553.0M | 18% |
| Commercial rental | $211.0M | 7% |
