vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agilent Technologies (A) and Reynolds Consumer Products Inc. (REYN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Agilent Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.7× Reynolds Consumer Products Inc.). Agilent Technologies runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 11.4%, a 5.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Agilent Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs 1.2%). Reynolds Consumer Products Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($200.0M vs $175.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Reynolds Consumer Products Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.4% CAGR vs 6.9%).
Agilent Technologies, Inc. provides application focused solutions to the life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets worldwide. The Life Sciences and Applied Markets segment offers liquid chromatography systems and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry systems; gas chromatography systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instruments; atomic absorption instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emissi...
The Rival Company is an American manufacturer of small appliances that produces products under the Bionaire, Crock-Pot, Fasco, Patton, Pollenex, Rival, Simer, and White Mountain brands. It became a wholly owned subsidiary of Holmes Products Corp. in 1999, and later became a brand of Sunbeam Products, a subsidiary of Jarden Corporation, which purchased Holmes in 2005. Jarden, in turn, merged with Newell Rubbermaid in 2016. It is now part of the Newell Brands company.
A vs REYN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.0B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $118.0M |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | 25.7% |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | 14.8% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 11.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 1.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.1% | -1.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $0.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $931.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $938.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $818.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $910.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $930.0M |
| Q1 26 | $305.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $434.0M | $118.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $79.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $73.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $31.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.0M | $120.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $86.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $97.0M |
| Q1 26 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.2% | 25.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.1% | 25.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | 24.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.2% | 26.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.4% | 27.5% |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | 12.4% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 10.4% |
| Q1 26 | $1.07 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $0.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $147.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.0B | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $12.8B | $4.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | 0.70× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $147.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $53.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $57.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $58.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $137.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $96.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $101.0M |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9B | $4.9B |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | 0.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | 0.77× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | 0.79× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | 0.87× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $268.0M | $237.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | $200.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | 19.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | 2.01× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $993.0M | $316.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $268.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $545.0M | $237.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $93.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $91.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $56.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.0M | $182.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $124.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.0M | $84.0M |
| Q1 26 | $175.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.0M | $200.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $48.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $51.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | $17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.0M | $141.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.0M | $93.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $65.0M |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 7.0% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | 2.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | 1.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | 1.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | 1.52× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | 0.87× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
A
| Service Other | $525.0M | 29% |
| Chemicaland Energy Market | $422.0M | 23% |
| Agilent Cross Lab | $273.0M | 15% |
| Environmentaland Forensics Market | $177.0M | 10% |
| Food Market | $166.0M | 9% |
| Academiaand Government Market | $130.0M | 7% |
| Applied Markets | $98.0M | 5% |
REYN
| Reynolds Cooking And Baking | $397.0M | 38% |
| Hefty Waste And Storage | $247.0M | 24% |
| Tableware Products | $229.0M | 22% |
| Presto Products | $164.0M | 16% |
