vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agilent Technologies (A) and Rockwell Automation (ROK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Rockwell Automation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.8B, roughly 1.2× Agilent Technologies). Agilent Technologies runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 14.5%, a 2.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Rockwell Automation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.9% vs 7.0%). Agilent Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($175.0M vs $170.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Agilent Technologies's revenue compounded faster (6.9% CAGR vs -0.5%).
Agilent Technologies, Inc. provides application focused solutions to the life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets worldwide. The Life Sciences and Applied Markets segment offers liquid chromatography systems and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry systems; gas chromatography systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instruments; atomic absorption instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emissi...
Rockwell Automation, Inc. is an American provider of industrial automation and digital transformation technologies headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Its brands include Allen-Bradley, FactoryTalk software and LifecycleIQ Services. Rockwell Automation employs approximately 27,000 people and has customers in more than 100 countries worldwide.
A vs ROK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $305.0M |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | 48.3% |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | 20.7% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 14.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.1% | 65.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $2.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | $305.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $434.0M | $305.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $138.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $295.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $252.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.0M | $184.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $239.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $232.0M |
| Q1 26 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.2% | 48.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.1% | 69.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | 40.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.2% | 37.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.4% | 38.8% |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | 14.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 17.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | 12.4% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | 12.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 11.3% |
| Q1 26 | $1.07 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | $2.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $1.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $2.60 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | $2.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $1.61 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $2.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $2.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $444.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.0B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | $3.7B |
| Total Assets | $12.8B | $11.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $444.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $468.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $495.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $456.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $477.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $471.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $407.0M |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7B | $11.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $11.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | $11.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9B | $11.2B |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | 0.73× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $268.0M | $234.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | $170.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | 8.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | 3.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | 0.77× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $993.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $268.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $545.0M | $234.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $454.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $527.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $199.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.0M | $364.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $432.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.0M | $279.1M |
| Q1 26 | $175.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.0M | $170.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $489.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | $171.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.0M | $293.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $238.4M |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 11.6% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | 0.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 3.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | 1.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | 0.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | 1.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 1.81× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | 1.20× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
A
| Service Other | $525.0M | 29% |
| Chemicaland Energy Market | $422.0M | 23% |
| Agilent Cross Lab | $273.0M | 15% |
| Environmentaland Forensics Market | $177.0M | 10% |
| Food Market | $166.0M | 9% |
| Academiaand Government Market | $130.0M | 7% |
| Applied Markets | $98.0M | 5% |
ROK
| Productsand Solutions | $1.9B | 89% |
| Lifecycle Services Segment | $259.0M | 12% |
