vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agilent Technologies (A) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tapestry, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $1.8B, roughly 1.4× Agilent Technologies). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs 17.0%, a 5.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tapestry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs 7.0%). Tapestry, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.0B vs $175.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs 6.9%).
Agilent Technologies, Inc. provides application focused solutions to the life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets worldwide. The Life Sciences and Applied Markets segment offers liquid chromatography systems and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry systems; gas chromatography systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instruments; atomic absorption instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emissi...
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
A vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.1% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $305.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $434.0M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.0M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $159.3M |
| Q1 26 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.2% | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.1% | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.2% | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.4% | 74.9% |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | 14.8% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 10.0% |
| Q1 26 | $1.07 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $0.67 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.0B | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $12.8B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $7.2B |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $6.9B |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9B | $13.4B |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | 2.39× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $268.0M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $993.0M | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $268.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $545.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.0M | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.0M | $256.0M |
| Q1 26 | $175.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.0M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.0M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $209.8M |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 13.2% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | 1.61× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
A
| Service Other | $525.0M | 29% |
| Chemicaland Energy Market | $422.0M | 23% |
| Agilent Cross Lab | $273.0M | 15% |
| Environmentaland Forensics Market | $177.0M | 10% |
| Food Market | $166.0M | 9% |
| Academiaand Government Market | $130.0M | 7% |
| Applied Markets | $98.0M | 5% |
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
