vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ATLANTIC AMERICAN CORP (AAME) and AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $53.8M, roughly 1.9× ATLANTIC AMERICAN CORP). ATLANTIC AMERICAN CORP runs the higher net margin — 1.1% vs -55.2%, a 56.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ATLANTIC AMERICAN CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.8% vs 11.5%). ATLANTIC AMERICAN CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($6.6M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, ATLANTIC AMERICAN CORP's revenue compounded faster (7.2% CAGR vs -2.6%).
The Atlantic Telegraph Company was a company formed on 6 November 1856 to undertake and exploit a commercial telegraph cable across the Atlantic Ocean, the first such telecommunications link.
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
AAME vs AP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $53.8M | $104.4M |
| Net Profit | $577.0K | $-57.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.4% | -54.0% |
| Net Margin | 1.1% | -55.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.8% | 11.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 128.9% | -1958.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $-2.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $53.8M | $103.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.3M | $108.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.1M | $99.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.0M | $93.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.5M | $92.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.7M | $107.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.0M | $110.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-57.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $577.0K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $802.0K | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $412.0K | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-684.0K | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.0M | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | -54.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -55.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | -6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.5% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.3% | -2.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.02 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.15 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.4M | $10.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $117.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $109.5M | $32.6M |
| Total Assets | $430.9M | $495.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.4M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.4M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.9M | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.6M | $15.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.0M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.2M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.2M | $10.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $117.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $119.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $115.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $115.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $116.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $119.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $116.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $32.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.5M | $60.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.2M | $62.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $102.4M | $64.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $99.6M | $58.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $105.8M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.7M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $102.8M | $56.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $495.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $430.9M | $524.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $429.3M | $537.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $388.4M | $536.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $393.4M | $530.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $387.0M | $547.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $386.0M | $560.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $365.8M | $565.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.06× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.6M | $2.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $6.6M | $-64.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 12.3% | -0.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 2.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 11.51× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $19.3M | $-8.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.6M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.3M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-722.0K | $-5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8M | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.0K | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $416.0K | $-5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.3M | $4.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-64.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.6M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-986.0K | $-7.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.6M | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.0K | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $361.0K | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.4M | $1.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.3% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | -3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.0% | -7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.3% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | -7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.4% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.80× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.90× | -4.62× | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.65× | 2.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AAME
| Bankers Fidelity | $30.0M | 56% |
| American Southern | $23.7M | 44% |
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
