vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Acadian Asset Management Inc. (AAMI) and ASSURED GUARANTY LTD (AGO), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Over the past eight quarters, Acadian Asset Management Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.6% CAGR vs -100.0%).
United Asset Management was an American holding company headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts.
Assured Investment Management (AIM) was an institutional asset management firm with a heritage in credit strategies, managing approximately $15.2 billion as of its defunct status in July 2023. Secondaries Investors referred to AIM as "one of the world's most prominent hedge funds".
AAMI vs AGO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $172.2M | $0 |
| Net Profit | $34.7M | $18.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 33.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 20.2% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.4% | -95.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.97 | $0.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $172.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $127.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.8M | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | $123.1M | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.0M | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | $105.7M | $0 |
| Q4 25 | $34.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.5M | $18.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9M | $171.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | $78.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.6M | $109.0M |
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.97 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.42 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.11 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.45 | $3.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $1.41 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.37 | $1.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.2B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $200.0M | $1.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $5.5B |
| Total Assets | $677.0M | $11.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.31× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $275.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.6B |
| Q4 25 | $677.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $751.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $672.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $677.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $703.2M | $11.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $555.2M | $12.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $533.1M | $12.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $544.9M | $12.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.30× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.7M | $46.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 0.25× | 2.56× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-19.1M | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.6M | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.7M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-40.4M | $-74.0M |
| Q4 25 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.58× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.10× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.43× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.45× | 2.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.12× | 0.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.15× | 0.74× | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.77× | -0.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
