vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Acadian Asset Management Inc. (AAMI) and Truist Financial (TFC), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Truist Financial is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.7B vs $172.2M, roughly 21.5× Acadian Asset Management Inc.). Truist Financial runs the higher net margin — 20.2% vs 36.6%, a 16.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Truist Financial posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.1% vs 2.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Acadian Asset Management Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.6% CAGR vs 4.8%).
United Asset Management was an American holding company headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts.
Truist Financial Corporation is an American bank holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina. The company was formed in December 2019 as the result of the merger of BB&T and SunTrust. Its bank operates 1,928 branches in 15 states and Washington, D.C., offering consumer, commercial, and investment banking, securities brokerage, asset management, mortgage, and insurance products and services. It is the tenth-largest bank in the United States, with $523 billion in assets.
AAMI vs TFC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $172.2M | $3.7B |
| Net Profit | $34.7M | $1.4B |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 33.3% | 42.3% |
| Net Margin | 20.2% | 36.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | 3.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.4% | 6.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.97 | $1.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $172.2M | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.2M | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $127.4M | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.9M | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.8M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $123.1M | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.0M | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $105.7M | $3.4B |
| Q4 25 | $34.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | $922.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.6M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | 42.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | 47.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | 42.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.6% | 43.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.7% | 43.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.9% | 47.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.9% | -148.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.7% | 40.5% |
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.5% | 40.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 34.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | 36.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.3% | 35.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | 40.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 26.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | 35.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.97 | $1.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.42 | $1.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $0.90 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | $0.87 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.11 | $0.94 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.45 | $0.99 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $0.62 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.37 | $0.81 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $200.0M | $42.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $65.2B |
| Total Assets | $677.0M | $547.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.64× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $200.0M | $42.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $41.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $44.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $32.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $275.0M | $35.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $36.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $39.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $65.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $65.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $64.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $64.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $63.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $65.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $63.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $59.1B |
| Q4 25 | $677.0M | $547.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $751.4M | $543.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $672.3M | $543.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $677.3M | $535.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $703.2M | $531.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $555.2M | $523.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $533.1M | $519.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $544.9M | $535.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.55× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.66× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.7M | $2.6B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 0.25× | 1.91× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.6M | $914.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.8M | $746.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-19.1M | $775.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.7M | $845.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-40.4M | $-990.0M |
| Q4 25 | 0.25× | 1.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.58× | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.10× | 0.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.43× | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.45× | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.12× | 1.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.15× | 0.92× | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.77× | -0.82× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
