vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Acadian Asset Management Inc. (AAMI) and AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Acadian Asset Management Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($172.2M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.6× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). Acadian Asset Management Inc. runs the higher net margin — 20.2% vs -55.2%, a 75.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 2.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Acadian Asset Management Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.6% CAGR vs -2.6%).
United Asset Management was an American holding company headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts.
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
AAMI vs AP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $172.2M | $104.4M |
| Net Profit | $34.7M | $-57.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 33.3% | -54.0% |
| Net Margin | 20.2% | -55.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | 11.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.4% | -1958.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.97 | $-2.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $172.2M | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.2M | $103.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $127.4M | $108.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.9M | $99.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.8M | $93.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $123.1M | $92.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.0M | $107.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $105.7M | $110.0M |
| Q4 25 | $34.7M | $-57.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.1M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.5M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.6M | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | -54.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.6% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.7% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.7% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | -55.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.5% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | -6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | -2.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.97 | $-2.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.42 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.11 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.45 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.37 | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $10.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $200.0M | $117.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $32.6M |
| Total Assets | $677.0M | $495.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.8M |
| Q4 25 | $200.0M | $117.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $119.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $115.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $115.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $275.0M | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $116.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $119.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $116.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $32.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $60.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $62.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $64.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $58.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $56.3M |
| Q4 25 | $677.0M | $495.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $751.4M | $524.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $672.3M | $537.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $677.3M | $536.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $703.2M | $530.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $555.2M | $547.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $533.1M | $560.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $544.9M | $565.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.06× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.4M | $2.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-64.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -0.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.07× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-8.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.4M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.9M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.6M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.8M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.8M | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.6M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.7M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-40.4M | $4.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-64.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-7.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | -0.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.58× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.10× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.43× | -4.62× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.31× | 2.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.15× | -2.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.77× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AAMI
Segment breakdown not available.
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
