vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Acadian Asset Management Inc. (AAMI) and Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Climb Global Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($182.4M vs $172.2M, roughly 1.1× Acadian Asset Management Inc.). Acadian Asset Management Inc. runs the higher net margin — 20.2% vs 1.8%, a 18.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 2.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs 27.6%).
United Asset Management was an American holding company headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts.
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
AAMI vs CLMB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $172.2M | $182.4M |
| Net Profit | $34.7M | $3.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 14.5% |
| Operating Margin | 33.3% | 2.1% |
| Net Margin | 20.2% | 1.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | 32.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.4% | -9.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.97 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $182.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $172.2M | $193.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.2M | $161.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $127.4M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.9M | $138.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.8M | $161.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $123.1M | $119.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.0M | $92.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.7M | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.1M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1M | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.5M | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9M | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | $3.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.6% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.9% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.9% | 4.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.5% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.3% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 3.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.97 | $1.51 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.42 | $1.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $1.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | $0.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.11 | $1.52 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.45 | $1.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $41.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $200.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $118.4M |
| Total Assets | $677.0M | $458.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $41.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $36.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $49.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $28.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $32.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $29.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $48.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $275.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $118.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $116.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $109.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $105.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $95.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $90.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $87.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $79.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $458.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $677.0M | $460.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $751.4M | $376.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $672.3M | $420.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $677.3M | $370.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $703.2M | $469.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $555.2M | $371.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $533.1M | $302.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.07× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.4M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.9M | $22.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.6M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.8M | $8.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.8M | $16.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.6M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.7M | $7.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.07× | -1.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.58× | 4.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.10× | -0.37× | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.43× | 2.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.31× | 2.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.12× | -0.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.15× | 2.13× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
