vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Acadian Asset Management Inc. (AAMI) and Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Douglas Elliman Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($245.4M vs $172.2M, roughly 1.4× Acadian Asset Management Inc.). Douglas Elliman Inc. runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 20.2%, a 7.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Acadian Asset Management Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.6% vs 0.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Acadian Asset Management Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.6% CAGR vs 10.7%).
United Asset Management was an American holding company headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts.
Douglas Elliman Inc. is a leading U.S.-based residential real estate brokerage firm. It offers luxury property sales, rentals, property management, and advisory solutions, serving high-net-worth clients across key metro markets including New York, California, Florida, and Texas.
AAMI vs DOUG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $172.2M | $245.4M |
| Net Profit | $34.7M | $68.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 33.3% | 27.3% |
| Net Margin | 20.2% | 27.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | 0.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.4% | 1243.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.97 | $0.80 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $172.2M | $245.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.2M | $262.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $127.4M | $271.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.9M | $253.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.8M | $243.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $123.1M | $266.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.0M | $285.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $105.7M | $200.2M |
| Q4 25 | $34.7M | $68.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.1M | $-24.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1M | $-22.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.5M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9M | $-27.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.6M | $-41.5M |
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | 27.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | -2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.6% | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.7% | -6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.9% | -2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.9% | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.7% | -20.7% |
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.5% | -9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | -8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | -2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.3% | -2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | -10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | -0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | -20.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.97 | $0.80 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.42 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.11 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.45 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.37 | $-0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $115.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $200.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $183.9M |
| Total Assets | $677.0M | $444.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $115.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $143.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $136.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $136.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $145.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $151.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $92.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $91.5M |
| Q4 25 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $275.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $183.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $115.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $137.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $158.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $162.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $173.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $195.1M |
| Q4 25 | $677.0M | $444.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $751.4M | $480.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $672.3M | $489.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $677.3M | $493.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $703.2M | $493.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $555.2M | $502.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $533.1M | $463.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $544.9M | $461.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.4M | $-14.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-14.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -6.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.07× | -0.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-17.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.4M | $-14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.9M | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.6M | $642.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.8M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.8M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.6M | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.7M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-40.4M | $-27.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-14.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-575.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $432.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-29.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | -6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -4.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -14.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | -0.07× | -0.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.58× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.10× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.43× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.15× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.77× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AAMI
Segment breakdown not available.
DOUG
| Commissions And Other Brokerage Income | $240.3M | 98% |
| Property Management Income | $2.8M | 1% |
| Property Management | $2.2M | 1% |