vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Acadian Asset Management Inc. (AAMI) and DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC (PLOW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($184.5M vs $172.2M, roughly 1.1× Acadian Asset Management Inc.). Acadian Asset Management Inc. runs the higher net margin — 20.2% vs 7.0%, a 13.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.6% vs 2.6%). Over the past eight quarters, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (38.9% CAGR vs 27.6%).
United Asset Management was an American holding company headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts.
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government...
AAMI vs PLOW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $172.2M | $184.5M |
| Net Profit | $34.7M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | 33.3% | 10.5% |
| Net Margin | 20.2% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | 28.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.4% | 62.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.97 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $172.2M | $184.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.2M | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $127.4M | $194.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.9M | $115.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.8M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $123.1M | $129.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.0M | $199.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $105.7M | $95.7M |
| Q4 25 | $34.7M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.1M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | $148.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.5M | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9M | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | $24.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.6M | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.6% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.7% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.9% | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.9% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.7% | -6.7% |
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.5% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.3% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.97 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.42 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $1.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.11 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.45 | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $1.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.37 | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $200.0M | $144.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $281.4M |
| Total Assets | $677.0M | $626.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $200.0M | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $275.0M | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $275.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $273.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $258.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $264.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $260.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $236.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $217.2M |
| Q4 25 | $677.0M | $626.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $751.4M | $694.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $672.3M | $671.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $677.3M | $621.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $703.2M | $590.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $555.2M | $665.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $533.1M | $617.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $544.9M | $577.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.4M | $95.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $92.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.07× | 7.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $63.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.4M | $95.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.9M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.6M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.8M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.8M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.6M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.7M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-40.4M | $-21.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $92.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $70.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-15.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $836.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-22.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -23.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | -0.07× | 7.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.58× | -1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.10× | -0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.43× | -9.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.31× | 9.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.12× | -0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.15× | 0.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.77× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AAMI
Segment breakdown not available.
PLOW
| Work Truck Solutions | $101.5M | 55% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $83.1M | 45% |
