vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Acadian Asset Management Inc. (AAMI) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ROGERS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($200.5M vs $172.2M, roughly 1.2× Acadian Asset Management Inc.). Acadian Asset Management Inc. runs the higher net margin — 20.2% vs 2.2%, a 17.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ROGERS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.2% vs 2.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Acadian Asset Management Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.6% CAGR vs -3.3%).
United Asset Management was an American holding company headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts.
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
AAMI vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $172.2M | $200.5M |
| Net Profit | $34.7M | $4.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | 33.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 20.2% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.4% | 421.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.97 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $200.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $172.2M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.2M | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $127.4M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.9M | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.8M | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $123.1M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.0M | $214.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.7M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.1M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1M | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.5M | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | $8.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.6% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.7% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.9% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.9% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.5% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.3% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.97 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.42 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.11 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.45 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $195.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $200.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $677.0M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $119.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $275.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $677.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $751.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $672.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $677.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $703.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $555.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $533.1M | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.4M | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.07× | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.4M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.9M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.6M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.8M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.8M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.6M | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.7M | $22.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.07× | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.58× | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.10× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.43× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.12× | 3.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.15× | 2.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
