vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Acadian Asset Management Inc. (AAMI) and Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Acadian Asset Management Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($172.2M vs $148.3M, roughly 1.2× Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.). Acadian Asset Management Inc. runs the higher net margin — 20.2% vs 5.5%, a 14.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.6% vs 2.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.8% CAGR vs 27.6%).
United Asset Management was an American holding company headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts.
Shoals Technologies Group is a leading provider of electrical balance of systems solutions for renewable energy and e-mobility. It supplies connectivity components for solar projects, energy storage systems and EV charging infrastructure, serving clients across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.
AAMI vs SHLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $172.2M | $148.3M |
| Net Profit | $34.7M | $8.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 31.6% |
| Operating Margin | 33.3% | 11.7% |
| Net Margin | 20.2% | 5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | 38.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.4% | 3.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.97 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $172.2M | $148.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.2M | $135.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $127.4M | $110.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.9M | $80.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.8M | $107.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $123.1M | $102.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.0M | $99.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $105.7M | $90.8M |
| Q4 25 | $34.7M | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.1M | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1M | $13.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | $-282.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.5M | $7.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9M | $-267.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.6M | $4.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.2% |
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | 14.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.6% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.7% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.9% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.9% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.7% | 12.8% |
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.5% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | -0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | -0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 11.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.97 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.42 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.11 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.45 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.37 | $0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $7.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $200.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $600.0M |
| Total Assets | $677.0M | $904.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $23.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.2M |
| Q4 25 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $141.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $275.0M | $141.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $141.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $146.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $168.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $600.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $589.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $575.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $558.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $556.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $545.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $544.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $554.0M |
| Q4 25 | $677.0M | $904.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $751.4M | $851.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $672.3M | $795.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $677.3M | $788.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $703.2M | $793.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $555.2M | $801.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $533.1M | $788.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $544.9M | $825.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.30× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.4M | $-4.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-11.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -7.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.07× | -0.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-16.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.4M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.9M | $19.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.6M | $-13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.8M | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.8M | $14.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.6M | $15.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.7M | $37.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-40.4M | $12.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-11.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $35.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | -7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -23.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | -0.07× | -0.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.58× | 1.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.10× | -1.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.43× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.31× | 1.79× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.15× | 3.21× | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.77× | 2.69× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AAMI
Segment breakdown not available.
SHLS
| System Solutions | $122.0M | 82% |
| Components | $26.3M | 18% |
