vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co (ABAT) and MDU RESOURCES GROUP INC (MDU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MDU RESOURCES GROUP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($522.6M vs $4.8M, roughly 109.8× AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co). MDU RESOURCES GROUP INC runs the higher net margin — 14.6% vs -195.0%, a 209.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1331.8% vs -1.6%).
American Battery Technology Company, formerly American Battery Metals Corporation, is a US-based battery recycling technology startup founded in 2011. It employs a hydrometallurgical process to recycle batteries and a targeted extraction system to extract raw materials from primary resources.
MDU Resources Group, Inc. is a U.S.-based corporation supplying products and services to regulated energy delivery and utilities related construction materials and services businesses. It is headquartered in Bismarck, North Dakota, and operates in 48 states.
ABAT vs MDU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8M | $522.6M |
| Net Profit | $-9.3M | $76.3M |
| Gross Margin | -33.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -207.5% | 20.5% |
| Net Margin | -195.0% | 14.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 1331.8% | -1.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.7% | 38.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.8M | $522.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.6K | $313.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $348.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $980.0K | $678.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $332.4K | $531.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $202.0K | $290.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $343.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $588.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-9.3M | $76.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.3M | $18.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.5M | $82.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.4M | $55.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.7M | $64.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $60.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $100.9M |
| Q4 25 | -33.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -375.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -92.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -274.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -894.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1159.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -207.5% | 20.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1080.8% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -280.1% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1086.3% | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4151.4% | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4854.0% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.4% |
| Q4 25 | -195.0% | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1098.5% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -366.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1173.1% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4031.0% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5790.5% | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 17.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | $0.37 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | $0.40 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.18 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | $0.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.49 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.9M | $28.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.0M | $2.8B |
| Total Assets | $123.3M | $7.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.97× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.9M | $28.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.9M | $75.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $58.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $59.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.6M | $66.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8M | $88.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $78.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $72.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | $119.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.0M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.6M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.6M | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.6M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.3M | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.0B |
| Q4 25 | $123.3M | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.5M | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.5M | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.5M | $7.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $88.3M | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.8M | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.80× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.80× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.76× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.76× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.8M | $80.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-336.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -64.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 79.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.06× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-297.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | $80.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | $57.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $117.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.3M | $217.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.3M | $60.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.6M | $140.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $136.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $165.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-336.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-121.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $36.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $124.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-95.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $673.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $26.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $48.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | -64.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -38.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 79.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 57.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 19.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.06× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.16× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.26× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.64× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ABAT
Segment breakdown not available.
MDU
| Natural Gas Distribution | $382.8M | 73% |
| Commercial Utility Sales | $42.7M | 8% |
| Residential Utility Sales | $33.7M | 6% |
| Pipelineand Midstream | $31.1M | 6% |
| Natural Gas Transportation | $17.2M | 3% |
| Industrial Utility Sales | $10.1M | 2% |
| Natural Gas Storage | $6.4M | 1% |
| Other Utility Sales | $1.9M | 0% |
