vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co (ABAT) and NSTS Bancorp, Inc. (NSTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.8M vs $2.5M, roughly 1.9× NSTS Bancorp, Inc.). NSTS Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 214.3% vs -195.0%, a 409.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1331.8% vs 3.0%).
American Battery Technology Company, formerly American Battery Metals Corporation, is a US-based battery recycling technology startup founded in 2011. It employs a hydrometallurgical process to recycle batteries and a targeted extraction system to extract raw materials from primary resources.
NSTS Bancorp, Inc. is a U.S.-based bank holding company. It offers a comprehensive suite of retail and commercial banking products and services, including deposit accounts, personal loans, commercial loans, and wealth management solutions, primarily serving individual consumers and small-to-medium enterprises in its regional operating areas.
ABAT vs NSTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8M | $2.5M |
| Net Profit | $-9.3M | $135.0K |
| Gross Margin | -33.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -207.5% | — |
| Net Margin | -195.0% | 214.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 1331.8% | 3.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.7% | 393.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.8M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.6K | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $980.0K | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-9.3M | $135.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.3M | $65.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | $-258.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.5M | $-328.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-46.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-171.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-326.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-246.0K |
| Q4 25 | -33.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -375.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -92.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -274.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -207.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1080.8% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -280.1% | -10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1086.3% | -15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -71.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -14.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -12.2% |
| Q4 25 | -195.0% | 214.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1098.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -366.4% | -10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1173.1% | -15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -71.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -14.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -12.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.9M | $34.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.0M | $80.0M |
| Total Assets | $123.3M | $266.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.9M | $34.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.9M | $34.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $47.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $57.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $53.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $34.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $32.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $36.4M |
| Q4 25 | $119.0M | $80.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.0M | $78.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.6M | $77.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.6M | $77.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $76.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $78.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $76.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $77.0M |
| Q4 25 | $123.3M | $266.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.5M | $269.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.5M | $276.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.5M | $282.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $278.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $268.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $265.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $265.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.8M | $4.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $3.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 156.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 30.01× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $4.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $655.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.3M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $92.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $616.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $76.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 156.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 113.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -126.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 373.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 69.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -76.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 44.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
