vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co (ABAT) and Ouster, Inc. (OUST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ouster, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($62.2M vs $4.8M, roughly 13.1× AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co). On growth, AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1331.8% vs 106.6%).
American Battery Technology Company, formerly American Battery Metals Corporation, is a US-based battery recycling technology startup founded in 2011. It employs a hydrometallurgical process to recycle batteries and a targeted extraction system to extract raw materials from primary resources.
Ouster, Inc. is an American lidar technology company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It builds high-resolution, digital 3D lidar sensors for use in autonomous vehicles, industrial, robotics, drones, mapping, defense, and security systems.
ABAT vs OUST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8M | $62.2M |
| Net Profit | $-9.3M | — |
| Gross Margin | -33.6% | 60.2% |
| Operating Margin | -207.5% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | -195.0% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 1331.8% | 106.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.8M | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.6K | $39.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $980.0K | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $28.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $25.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-9.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.3M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | $-20.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.5M | $-22.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-25.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-23.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-23.8M |
| Q4 25 | -33.6% | 60.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -375.1% | 42.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -92.6% | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -274.5% | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.6% |
| Q4 25 | -207.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1080.8% | -61.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -280.1% | -76.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1086.3% | -73.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -85.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -98.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -93.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -99.5% |
| Q4 25 | -195.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1098.5% | -55.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -366.4% | -58.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1173.1% | -67.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -91.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -88.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -91.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.53 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.9M | $208.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.0M | $261.7M |
| Total Assets | $123.3M | $349.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.9M | $208.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.9M | $244.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $226.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $168.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $151.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $184.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $187.8M |
| Q4 25 | $119.0M | $261.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.0M | $247.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.6M | $221.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.6M | $167.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $180.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $171.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $170.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $167.2M |
| Q4 25 | $123.3M | $349.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.5M | $353.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.5M | $321.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.5M | $268.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $276.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $255.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $309.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $317.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.8M | $-15.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-37.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -59.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 35.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-64.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | $-15.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | $-18.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.3M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-5.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-37.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-22.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | -59.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -50.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -81.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -27.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.3% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
