vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AbbVie (ABBV) and Cellectis S.A. (CLLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AbbVie is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($16.6B vs $9.5M, roughly 1748.5× Cellectis S.A.). AbbVie runs the higher net margin — 10.9% vs -265.9%, a 276.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cellectis S.A. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (375.0% vs 10.0%). AbbVie produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.9B vs $27.6M).
AbbVie Inc. is an American pharmaceutical company headquartered in North Chicago, Illinois. They have produced drugs to treat a wide range of medical issues.
Cellectis is a French biopharmaceutical company. It develops genome-edited chimeric antigen receptor T-cell technologies for cancer immunotherapy. It has offices in Paris, New York City, and Raleigh, North Carolina.
ABBV vs CLLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2024
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $16.6B | $9.5M |
| Net Profit | $1.8B | $-25.3M |
| Gross Margin | 72.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 27.3% | -181.1% |
| Net Margin | 10.9% | -265.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.0% | 375.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 8354.5% | -51.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.02 | $-0.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $16.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.5B | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $186.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $938.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $-25.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | 72.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 66.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 71.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 70.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 70.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 70.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 66.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 27.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.6% | -181.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | -265.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.02 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.52 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.88 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.77 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.77 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.3B | $149.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $58.9B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-3.3B | $148.6M |
| Total Assets | $134.0B | $407.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.2B | $149.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $58.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | $-3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-183.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8B | $148.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $134.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $133.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $137.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $135.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $143.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.9B | $407.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $148.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.70× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.56× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.97× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.2B | $28.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.9B | $27.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.4% | 290.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | 13.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.87× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $17.8B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $28.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $27.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | 29.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.0% | 290.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.87× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.76× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.49× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.49× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.66× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.95× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.