vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AbbVie (ABBV) and TANTECH HOLDINGS LTD (TANH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AbbVie is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($16.6B vs $21.5M, roughly 773.5× TANTECH HOLDINGS LTD). AbbVie runs the higher net margin — 10.9% vs 8.2%, a 2.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AbbVie posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.0% vs -0.2%).
AbbVie Inc. is an American pharmaceutical company headquartered in North Chicago, Illinois. They have produced drugs to treat a wide range of medical issues.
Tantech Holdings Ltd is a China-based specialty manufacturing enterprise focused on R&D, production and distribution of bamboo-derived carbon products, high-performance clean energy materials and eco-friendly consumer goods, serving customers across Chinese and global markets in consumer goods, industrial materials and new energy segments.
ABBV vs TANH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $16.6B | $21.5M |
| Net Profit | $1.8B | $1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 72.6% | 22.2% |
| Operating Margin | 27.3% | 10.8% |
| Net Margin | 10.9% | 8.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.0% | -0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 8354.5% | 59.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.02 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $16.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.4B | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.5B | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $186.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $938.0M | $1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | 72.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 66.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 71.8% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 70.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 70.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 70.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.9% | 22.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 66.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 27.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.7% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.6% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.02 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.52 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.88 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.77 | $0.21 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.77 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.3B | $35.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $58.9B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-3.3B | $128.3M |
| Total Assets | $134.0B | $143.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.5B | $35.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.2B | $34.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $58.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | $-3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-183.0M | $128.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8B | $126.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $134.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $133.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $137.2B | $143.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $135.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $143.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.9B | $142.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $148.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.70× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.56× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.97× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.2B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.9B | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.87× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $17.8B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | 29.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.0% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.87× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.76× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.49× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.49× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.66× | 4.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.95× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ABBV
Segment breakdown not available.
TANH
| Revenue from China | $20.9M | 97% |
| Revenue directly from foreign countries | $602.2K | 3% |
