vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP (SXT) and TANTECH HOLDINGS LTD (TANH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($435.8M vs $21.5M, roughly 20.3× TANTECH HOLDINGS LTD). SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP runs the higher net margin — 10.1% vs 8.2%, a 1.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (54.2% vs -0.2%).
Sensient Technologies is a global manufacturer and marketer of colors, flavors and fragrances based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Their products are used in many foods and beverages, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, home and personal care products, specialty printing and imaging products, computer imaging and industrial colors. Sensient reported revenue of $1,468 million in 2013. Subdivisions include the Sensient Flavors & Fragrances Group and the Sensient Color Group. Within the Flavors & Fragrances G...
Tantech Holdings Ltd is a China-based specialty manufacturing enterprise focused on R&D, production and distribution of bamboo-derived carbon products, high-performance clean energy materials and eco-friendly consumer goods, serving customers across Chinese and global markets in consumer goods, industrial materials and new energy segments.
SXT vs TANH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q2 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $435.8M | $21.5M |
| Net Profit | $44.2M | $1.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 22.2% |
| Operating Margin | 15.3% | 10.8% |
| Net Margin | 10.1% | 8.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 54.2% | -0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 28.2% | 59.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.04 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $435.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $393.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $412.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $414.2M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $392.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $376.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $392.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $403.5M | $21.5M |
| Q1 26 | $44.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $25.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.6M | $1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $1.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.5% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.4% | 22.3% |
| Q1 26 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.9% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.3% | 8.0% |
| Q1 26 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.7% | 5.1% |
| Q1 26 | $1.04 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.60 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.87 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.88 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.71 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.77 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.73 | $0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $38.5M | $35.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $767.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $128.3M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $143.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $38.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.7M | $35.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.3M | $34.2M |
| Q1 26 | $767.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $709.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $613.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $128.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $126.0M |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $143.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $142.2M |
| Q1 26 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SXT
Segment breakdown not available.
TANH
| Revenue from China | $20.9M | 97% |
| Revenue directly from foreign countries | $602.2K | 3% |
