vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ameris Bancorp (ABCB) and ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC (ESE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ameris Bancorp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($314.4M vs $289.7M, roughly 1.1× ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC). Ameris Bancorp runs the higher net margin — 35.1% vs 9.9%, a 25.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.3% vs 10.0%). Over the past eight quarters, ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (7.8% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Ameris Bancorp is an American bank holding company headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia. Through its bank subsidiary, Ameris Bank, the company operates full-service branches in Georgia, Alabama, Florida, North Carolina and South Carolina, and mortgage-only locations in Georgia, Alabama, Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, Maryland, and Tennessee. The company offers online and mobile banking options for both consumers and businesses.
Esco is a Singaporean brand that develops, manufactures, and sells products and services for laboratories.
ABCB vs ESE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $314.4M | $289.7M |
| Net Profit | $110.5M | $28.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 13.2% |
| Net Margin | 35.1% | 9.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.0% | 17.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2.0% | 22.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.63 | $1.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $314.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $307.1M | $289.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $314.2M | $286.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $300.7M | $296.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $285.9M | $265.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $290.8M | $247.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $283.8M | $298.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $300.6M | $260.8M |
| Q1 26 | $110.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $108.4M | $28.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.0M | $218.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.8M | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $87.9M | $31.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.4M | $23.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $99.2M | $34.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.8M | $29.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 45.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 41.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 39.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 45.9% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.6% | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 47.4% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.5% | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.3% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.4% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.1% | 14.3% |
| Q1 26 | 35.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 44.2% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.5% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.8% | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.5% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.0% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.2% | 11.2% |
| Q1 26 | $1.63 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.59 | $1.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.54 | $8.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.60 | $1.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.27 | $1.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.35 | $0.91 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.44 | $1.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.32 | $1.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $103.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $145.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.1B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $28.1B | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.09× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $103.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $101.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $78.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $57.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $66.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $63.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $145.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $186.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $525.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $88.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $112.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $122.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $173.0M |
| Q1 26 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $28.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $27.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.5B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.14× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $68.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $63.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 21.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $239.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $390.2M | $68.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $104.9M | $109.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.4M | $73.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $116.9M | $24.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $154.2M | $34.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.2M | $72.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-97.1M | $36.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $369.6M | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.5M | $97.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.7M | $64.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $114.2M | $14.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.7M | $29.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $99.8M | $60.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-100.3M | $27.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 120.4% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.0% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.9% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.9% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.4% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.2% | 20.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.4% | 10.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.60× | 2.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.99× | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.56× | 2.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.33× | 0.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.63× | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | 2.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.07× | 1.24× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ABCB
Segment breakdown not available.
ESE
| US Government | $98.0M | 34% |
| Utility Solutions Group | $87.5M | 30% |
| RF Shielding And Test | $58.3M | 20% |
| Commercial | $45.8M | 16% |
| Related Party | $1.3M | 0% |
