vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ameris Bancorp (ABCB) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ameris Bancorp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($314.4M vs $245.3M, roughly 1.3× Tecnoglass Inc.). Ameris Bancorp runs the higher net margin — 35.1% vs 10.6%, a 24.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ameris Bancorp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.0% vs 2.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Tecnoglass Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Ameris Bancorp is an American bank holding company headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia. Through its bank subsidiary, Ameris Bank, the company operates full-service branches in Georgia, Alabama, Florida, North Carolina and South Carolina, and mortgage-only locations in Georgia, Alabama, Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, Maryland, and Tennessee. The company offers online and mobile banking options for both consumers and businesses.
Tecnoglass Inc. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance architectural glass, aluminum windows, doors, and associated building components. It primarily caters to residential and commercial construction sectors across North America and Latin America, offering custom, energy-efficient solutions for new construction and renovation projects.
ABCB vs TGLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $314.4M | $245.3M |
| Net Profit | $110.5M | $26.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 40.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 18.3% |
| Net Margin | 35.1% | 10.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.0% | 2.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -44.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.63 | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $314.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $307.1M | $245.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $314.2M | $260.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $300.7M | $255.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $285.9M | $222.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $290.8M | $239.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $283.8M | $238.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $300.6M | $219.7M |
| Q1 26 | $110.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $108.4M | $26.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.0M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.8M | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $87.9M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.4M | $47.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $99.2M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.8M | $35.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 40.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 45.9% | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.6% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 47.4% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.5% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.3% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.4% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.1% | 23.3% |
| Q1 26 | 35.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 44.2% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.5% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.8% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.5% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.0% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.2% | 15.9% |
| Q1 26 | $1.63 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.59 | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.54 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.60 | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.27 | $0.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.35 | $1.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.44 | $1.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.32 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $104.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $174.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.1B | $713.1M |
| Total Assets | $28.1B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $104.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $127.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $140.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $160.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $137.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $124.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $129.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $174.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $114.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $110.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $111.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $144.7M |
| Q1 26 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $713.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $764.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $736.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $685.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $631.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7B | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $574.8M |
| Q1 26 | $28.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $27.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4B | $996.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.5B | $942.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.25× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $31.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $11.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 4.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 8.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $34.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $390.2M | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $104.9M | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.4M | $17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $116.9M | $46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $154.2M | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.2M | $41.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-97.1M | $34.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $369.6M | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.5M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.7M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $114.2M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.7M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $99.8M | $17.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-100.3M | $14.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 120.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.0% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.9% | -5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.9% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.4% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.2% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.4% | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 9.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.60× | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.99× | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.56× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.33× | 1.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.63× | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.07× | 0.98× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ABCB
Segment breakdown not available.
TGLS
| Product Sales | $164.2M | 67% |
| Fixed Price Contracts | $81.1M | 33% |
| Related Party | $692.0K | 0% |
