vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ameris Bancorp (ABCB) and Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (WD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($340.0M vs $314.4M, roughly 1.1× Ameris Bancorp). Ameris Bancorp runs the higher net margin — 35.1% vs -12.9%, a 48.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ameris Bancorp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.0% vs -0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (22.1% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Ameris Bancorp is an American bank holding company headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia. Through its bank subsidiary, Ameris Bank, the company operates full-service branches in Georgia, Alabama, Florida, North Carolina and South Carolina, and mortgage-only locations in Georgia, Alabama, Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, Maryland, and Tennessee. The company offers online and mobile banking options for both consumers and businesses.
Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is one of the largest commercial real estate finance and advisory services firms in the United States and internationally.
ABCB vs WD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $314.4M | $340.0M |
| Net Profit | $110.5M | $-13.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -17.2% |
| Net Margin | 35.1% | -12.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.0% | -0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2.0% | -131.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.63 | $-0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $314.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $307.1M | $340.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $314.2M | $337.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $300.7M | $319.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $285.9M | $237.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $290.8M | $341.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $283.8M | $292.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $300.6M | $270.7M |
| Q1 26 | $110.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $108.4M | $-13.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.0M | $33.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.8M | $34.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $87.9M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.4M | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $99.2M | $28.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.8M | $22.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 45.9% | -17.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.6% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 47.4% | 14.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.5% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.3% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.4% | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.1% | 10.4% |
| Q1 26 | 35.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 44.2% | -12.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.5% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.5% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.0% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.2% | 8.4% |
| Q1 26 | $1.63 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.59 | $-0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.54 | $0.98 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.60 | $0.99 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.27 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.35 | $1.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.44 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.32 | $0.67 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $299.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.1B | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $28.1B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $299.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $233.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $181.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $279.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $179.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $208.1M |
| Q1 26 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $28.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $27.5B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.1B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.7B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.5B | $4.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.3B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.5B | $4.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-664.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-680.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -200.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-2.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $390.2M | $-664.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $104.9M | $-948.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.4M | $-238.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $116.9M | $-281.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $154.2M | $129.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.2M | $-202.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-97.1M | $-237.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $369.6M | $-680.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.5M | $-950.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.7M | $-241.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $114.2M | $-284.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.7M | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $99.8M | $-204.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-100.3M | $-241.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 120.4% | -200.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.0% | -281.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.9% | -75.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.9% | -120.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.4% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.2% | -69.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.4% | -89.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.60× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.99× | -28.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.56× | -7.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.33× | -102.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.63× | 2.89× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | -7.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.07× | -10.49× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
