vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AbCellera Biologics Inc. (ABCL) and MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AbCellera Biologics Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($44.9M vs $40.6M, roughly 1.1× MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp). MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp runs the higher net margin — -19.9% vs -19.9%, a 0.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AbCellera Biologics Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (788.4% vs -20.7%). MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-4.8M vs $-44.6M). Over the past eight quarters, AbCellera Biologics Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (112.3% CAGR vs -3.4%).
AbCellera Biologics Inc. is a Vancouver, British Columbia-based biotechnology company that discovers and develops antibody therapeutics. The company is best known for its leading role in the Pandemic Prevention Platform, a project of DARPA's Biological Technologies Office. AbCellera utilizes a proprietary technology platform, which they claim can develop "medical countermeasures within 60 days." Its platform for single-cell screening was initially developed at the University of British Columbia.
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
ABCL vs MX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $44.9M | $40.6M |
| Net Profit | $-8.9M | $-8.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | -63.7% | -26.1% |
| Net Margin | -19.9% | -19.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 788.4% | -20.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 73.9% | 50.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $-0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $44.9M | $40.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.1M | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | $44.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0M | $51.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $46.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.0M | $43.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.9M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-57.1M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-34.7M | $323.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-45.6M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-51.1M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-36.9M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-40.6M | $-15.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | -63.7% | -26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -851.8% | -25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -290.2% | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1479.6% | -14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1439.4% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1276.2% | -12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -551.5% | -21.6% |
| Q4 25 | -19.9% | -19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -637.8% | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -203.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1077.2% | -19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -31.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -785.4% | -17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -504.3% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -408.0% | -35.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.03 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.19 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.12 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.15 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $128.5M | $103.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $966.9M | $248.3M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $351.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $128.5M | $103.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.2M | $108.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | $113.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.3M | $132.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $156.3M | $138.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $126.6M | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.3M | $162.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.6M | $171.6M |
| Q4 25 | $966.9M | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $964.0M | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $270.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $269.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $276.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $299.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $305.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $321.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $351.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $359.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $370.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $373.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $379.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $411.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $412.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $426.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-34.7M | $5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-44.6M | $-4.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -99.4% | -11.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 21.9% | 25.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-174.1M | $-54.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-34.7M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-52.6M | $162.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.4M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.6M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-108.6M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-28.9M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.0M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-41.7M | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-44.6M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-61.5M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-45.8M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.2M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-187.0M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-47.4M | $-15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-50.1M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-65.8M | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | -99.4% | -11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -687.0% | -16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -267.9% | -77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -524.0% | -10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3702.8% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -728.4% | -28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -683.8% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -661.5% | -10.7% |
| Q4 25 | 21.9% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 99.7% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 78.2% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 251.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1552.7% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 284.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 274.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 242.5% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -77.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ABCL
Segment breakdown not available.
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
