vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ARBOR REALTY TRUST INC (ABR) and El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (LOCO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ARBOR REALTY TRUST INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($133.4M vs $126.2M, roughly 1.1× El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.). On growth, El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.9% vs -12.1%). Over the past eight quarters, El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (1.6% CAGR vs -8.9%).
Arbor Realty Trust Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered specialized real estate investment trust (REIT). It primarily provides structured financing solutions for multifamily residential and commercial real estate projects, including bridge loans, agency lending, and mezzanine financing. Its core market covers the U.S. real estate sector, serving property owners, developers and real estate investors nationwide.
El Pollo Loco, Inc., is a restaurant chain based in the United States, specializing in Mexican-style grilled chicken. Restaurant service consists of dine-in and take-out, with some locations offering drive-through options. The company is headquartered in Costa Mesa, California, and operates about 500 company-owned and franchised restaurants in the Southwestern United States.
ABR vs LOCO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $133.4M | $126.2M |
| Net Profit | — | $8.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 9.7% |
| Net Margin | — | 6.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -12.1% | 5.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 48.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.08 | $0.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $126.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $133.4M | $123.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $112.4M | $121.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.4M | $125.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $134.2M | $119.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.7M | $114.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.7M | $120.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $153.1M | $122.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.0M | $7.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.3M | $7.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.4M | $5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.5M | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $61.8M | $7.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.8% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.3% | 4.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.9% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.4% | 6.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.27 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.08 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $0.25 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.16 | $0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.31 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.31 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $0.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $482.9M | $3.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.0B | $302.5M |
| Total Assets | $14.5B | $609.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.75× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $482.9M | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $423.4M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $255.7M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $308.8M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $503.8M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $687.5M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $737.5M | $10.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.1B | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.4B | $61.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1B | $69.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.9B | $73.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $71.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.3B | $76.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6B | $87.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $302.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $291.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $282.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $274.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $265.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $260.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $255.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $248.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $609.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.5B | $606.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.9B | $602.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.6B | $596.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.4B | $590.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.5B | $592.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9B | $590.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.2B | $593.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.75× | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.47× | 0.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.40× | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.29× | 0.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.29× | 0.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.40× | 0.30× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.47× | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $372.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $372.4M | $13.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $178.7M | $15.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.0M | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $150.5M | $4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $461.5M | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $85.0M | $13.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.9M | $17.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.44× | 2.08× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.65× | 1.99× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.47× | 0.86× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | 2.11× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.13× | 2.22× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
