vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (LOCO) and Twin Hospitality Group Inc. (TWNP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($123.5M vs $82.3M, roughly 1.5× Twin Hospitality Group Inc.). El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs -29.7%, a 35.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($5.1M vs $-7.4M).
El Pollo Loco, Inc., is a restaurant chain based in the United States, specializing in Mexican-style grilled chicken. Restaurant service consists of dine-in and take-out, with some locations offering drive-through options. The company is headquartered in Costa Mesa, California, and operates about 500 company-owned and franchised restaurants in the Southwestern United States.
Target Hospitality is a company that provides workforce lodging and other temporary, modular housing used for oil, gas and mining operations; large-scale events; and disaster relief. Target Hospitality is based in The Woodlands, Texas, and also has offices in Williston, North Dakota; Denver, Colorado; Calgary, Alberta.
LOCO vs TWNP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $123.5M | $82.3M |
| Net Profit | $6.5M | $-24.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.3% | -16.2% |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | -29.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.22 | $-0.43 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $123.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.5M | $82.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $125.8M | $87.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.2M | $87.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $120.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4M | $-24.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $-20.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $-12.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | -16.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | -13.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.5% | -1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | -29.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.6% | -23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.6% | -13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.22 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.25 | $-0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.24 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.19 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.19 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $51.0M | $402.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $291.1M | $-92.1M |
| Total Assets | $606.6M | $516.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.18× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $51.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.0M | $402.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.0M | $411.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.0M | $413.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $76.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $80.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $291.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $282.9M | $-92.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.2M | $-78.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.7M | $-101.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $255.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $248.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $256.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $606.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $602.7M | $516.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $596.8M | $535.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $590.5M | $544.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $590.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $593.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $598.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.27× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.27× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.30× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $13.9M | $-5.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $5.1M | $-7.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.1% | -9.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.1% | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.13× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $25.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.3M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.1M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.9M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | $-9.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | -9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | -12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | -11.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 4.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.08× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.99× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.95× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.11× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.22× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.89× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LOCO
| Services | $102.4M | 83% |
| Franchise | $13.0M | 11% |
| Franchise Advertising Fee | $8.1M | 7% |
TWNP
Segment breakdown not available.