vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALS INC (ACAD) and H2O AMERICA (HTO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($284.0M vs $199.4M, roughly 1.4× H2O AMERICA). ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALS INC runs the higher net margin — 96.3% vs 8.1%, a 88.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.4% vs 1.5%). Over the past eight quarters, ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALS INC's revenue compounded faster (17.5% CAGR vs 15.3%).
Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Del Mar, San Diego, California.
H2O Wireless is a United States-based prepaid cell phone service, that utilizes the AT&T network. It is a brand of the mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) Locus Telecommunications, a subsidiary of Telrite Holdings, Inc., since 2019. Locus was formerly a subsidiary of KDDI America corporation, starting in 2010. H2O Wireless is primarily advertised as a non-restrictive phone service for customers to bring or buy unlocked smartphones, although AT&T contract/locked phones may be accepted as well.
ACAD vs HTO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $284.0M | $199.4M |
| Net Profit | $273.6M | $16.2M |
| Gross Margin | 90.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | 16.6% |
| Net Margin | 96.3% | 8.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | 1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 90.3% | -29.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.61 | $0.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $284.0M | $199.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $278.6M | $243.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.6M | $197.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $244.3M | $164.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $259.6M | $196.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $250.4M | $216.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $242.0M | $173.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $205.8M | $150.0M |
| Q4 25 | $273.6M | $16.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.8M | $45.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.7M | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.0M | $16.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.7M | $22.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.8M | $38.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.4M | $20.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.6M | $11.7M |
| Q4 25 | 90.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 92.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 92.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 91.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 91.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 92.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 92.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 88.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.8% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.2% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 21.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.1% | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | 23.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.4% | 18.6% |
| Q4 25 | 96.3% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.4% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.1% | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | $1.61 | $0.45 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.42 | $1.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.16 | $0.71 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.11 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.86 | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $1.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.20 | $0.64 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.10 | $0.36 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $177.7M | $20.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.23× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $177.7M | $20.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $258.0M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $253.6M | $19.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $217.7M | $23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $319.6M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $155.1M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $177.1M | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $204.7M | $4.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $917.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $822.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $765.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $732.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $577.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $516.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $464.0M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $4.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $976.9M | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $914.1M | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $855.1M | $4.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-48.7M | $63.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.18× | 3.92× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-48.7M | $63.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.3M | $77.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.0M | $60.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.3M | $43.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.4M | $41.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.2M | $53.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.0M | $49.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.1M | $51.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.18× | 3.92× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.03× | 1.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.40× | 2.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.07× | 2.61× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.28× | 1.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.93× | 1.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.75× | 2.38× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.76× | 4.38× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ACAD
| Nuplazid | $174.4M | 61% |
| Daybue | $109.6M | 39% |
HTO
| Water Utility Services | $191.0M | 96% |
| Other | $8.4M | 4% |