vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALS INC (ACAD) and KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC (KLIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($284.0M vs $199.6M, roughly 1.4× KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC). ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALS INC runs the higher net margin — 96.3% vs 8.4%, a 87.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.2% vs 9.4%).
Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Del Mar, San Diego, California.
Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc. is a leading global provider of semiconductor packaging and assembly equipment, materials, and process solutions. It serves semiconductor manufacturers across automotive electronics, consumer devices, industrial systems, and high-performance computing markets, with core offerings covering wire bonding and advanced packaging technologies.
ACAD vs KLIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $284.0M | $199.6M |
| Net Profit | $273.6M | $16.8M |
| Gross Margin | 90.8% | 49.6% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | 8.9% |
| Net Margin | 96.3% | 8.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 90.3% | -79.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.61 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $199.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $284.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $278.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $244.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $259.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $250.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $242.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $16.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $273.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 49.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 90.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 92.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 92.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 91.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 91.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 92.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 92.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 96.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.61 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.42 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.86 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.20 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $177.7M | $481.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $825.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $481.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $177.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $258.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $253.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $217.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $319.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $155.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $177.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $825.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $917.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $822.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $765.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $732.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $577.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $516.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $976.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $914.1M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-48.7M | $-8.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-11.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -5.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.18× | -0.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-48.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-11.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -0.53× | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.18× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.93× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.75× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ACAD
| Nuplazid | $174.4M | 61% |
| Daybue | $109.6M | 39% |
KLIC
| Ball Bonding Equipment Segment | $110.3M | 55% |
| Aftermarket Products And Services APS Segment Post Cessation | $45.1M | 23% |
| Wedge Bonding Equipment Segment | $21.1M | 11% |
| Automotiveand Industrial | $13.6M | 7% |
| All Others Segment | $11.4M | 6% |
